What does android ott mean?

OTT is the abbreviation of "Over The Top", which is a very popular word in the communication industry. The word comes from sports like basketball, which means "over the head", meaning that basketball players go back and forth over their heads to reach their destination. In other words, Internet companies surpass operators and develop various video and data services based on the open Internet, emphasizing the independence of services from physical networks. OTT refers to the development of various video and data services by Internet companies other than operators based on the open Internet. Worldwide, operators all over the world regard OTT companies like Skype as the number one enemy, because Skype rents bandwidth from telecom operators at a very cheap price and then makes profits by using VoIP monthly packages, but it has a huge impact on the voice and video services of telecom operators.

This has led many operators around the world to sue the government for the OTT business such as Skype, demanding that it be banned. They think that "if you know that OTT business is used to grab the business of telecom operators, then no one has the obligation to provide ammunition for their enemies". According to Arthur D.Little, 25% of international call time is done by Skype. Ovum, another market research company, predicts that from 20 12 to 2020, the voice revenue of global operators (including fixed and mobile) will decrease at a compound annual growth rate of -2.4%, from $970.4 billion in 20 12 to $799.6 billion in 2020.

Some organizations estimate that the impact of OTT voice applications such as Skype on the voice revenue of mobile operators is tens of billions of dollars every year, that is to say, Skype earns billions of dollars every year, but the losses caused by telecom operators are more than ten times. Therefore, OTT business has a great influence on the future of telecom operators. In China, the former Ministry of Information Industry has already banned Skype's VoIP service, but now, the three major operators have met a stronger OTT business opponent, and this opponent is no longer a foreign company.

During the two sessions, the two sides fought fiercely. Apart from some complimentary remarks, Xi Guohua, chairman of China Mobile, said, "OTT business is both a challenge and an opportunity for operators." He also admitted that "the current communication network is still the advantage of traditional operators. On the other hand, many services of the Internet are carried out on the network of telecom operators, which is the shortcoming of Internet companies. "

However, Ma, CEO of Tencent, pointed out the core issues. During the two sessions, he said that the information superhighway should be understood as infrastructure such as roads, railways and airport power grids. Therefore, he appealed that the infrastructure of the Internet, especially broadband, should be borne by the state. Don't give these to operators such as China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom. These operators must calculate an account. Expensive equipment, electricity, bandwidth and optical fiber laying. They will add these costs to the people, so the salary level of our people is lower than others, but the internet access fee is more expensive than other places. A few times, ten times.

There are undoubtedly two points in the meaning of the horse. First, he hopes to win the public's impression of monopoly and inaction of telecom operators through public dissatisfaction with China's high internet speed; Second, he suggested that telecommunications infrastructure should be built by the state, not by operators.

But these words make many people of the three major telecom operators feel incredible, because the actual situation for decades is that the telecom infrastructure can be built by the state, but the state must also have a specific undertaker to build it, and ultimately it will be built by telecom operators, and it is impossible for social enterprises to build it. Negotiations between the three major operators and Tencent on OTT are endless. The main content is how to supervise OTT business and how to charge OTT business. According to the latest news, the two camps have exchanged views and the game has begun.

Previously, the number of New Year messages during the Spring Festival attracted special attention. When the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced that the business volume of mobile short MMS reached a new high during the Spring Festival, many telecom operators sighed.

Because another statistic released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is very pessimistic, in 20 12, the number of mobile short messages sent nationwide reached 897,354,38+0 billion, with a year-on-year increase of only 2. 1%, the lowest growth rate in four years. According to the increase of mobile phone users in China 1 1%, in fact, the per capita SMS sending volume has decreased by about 9%.

The reason why the industry pays so much attention to Spring Festival SMS is because people are constantly observing the contest between the two camps, that is, whether OTT business will continue to eat SMS and how much. Previously, Sina Technology reported that after learning that OTT services such as WeChat would "self-destruct", the three major operators finally began to wake up and began to discuss with OTT services such as WeChat, pointing out that OTT enterprises have obviously squeezed traditional telecom operators, using VoIP to describe OTT services. Using the network of telecom operators to open free voice and video services, resulting in a large loss of SMS, MMS, video and other services. Obviously, the two camps have reached the time of showdown.

From the perspective of foreign countries, there are three main attitudes of telecom operators towards OTT services.

The first is to block the OTT application. For example, the Korea Communications Commission approved the relevant requests of Korean mobile operators. From then on, Korean mobile operators will be able to charge OTT voice service providers, or "cut off" the OTT voice stream and not open the network to OTT voice service providers.

One is to cooperate with OTT. Hutchison 3 provided users with a free Skype service interface in 2006. In 2007, Hutchison 3 and Skype jointly developed Skype phone, and then jointly launched the upgrade service.

Another is to launch its own brand OTT business and compete with OTT service providers for users. For example, Telefonica, a Spanish operator, launched TuMe service on iPhone and Android platforms, allowing users to send voice, text services, photos and videos for free, and send their location to friends for free. French operator Orange also launched an OTT service called Libon, similar to Skype and Google Talk.

In China, it is not clear how the three major operators charge for WeChat services. However, one thing is certain, the three major operators will no longer charge Tencent only a small amount of bandwidth rental fees or unlimited monthly fees similar to those in 5 yuan.

According to an insider of a telecom operator, the current thinking at least includes: First, users must be charged, and bandwidth rental fees can no longer be charged; 2. Unlimited monthly fee will no longer be provided.

Another thing that can be used for reference is that OTT service is not provided to users with low packages. For example, Vodafone UK stipulates that users with a monthly tariff package of less than 40 pounds are not allowed to use VoIP, and if they want to use it, they have to pay 15 pounds a month, thus effectively preventing low-end customers from using VoIP.