Joke Collection Website - Public benefit messages - Is it promotion and re-appointment when the top leader at the county level is appointed as the top leader in the district?

Is it promotion and re-appointment when the top leader at the county level is appointed as the top leader in the district?

The counties and districts mentioned in the question definitely refer to the same prefecture-level city, and need to be analyzed separately.

Our country stipulates that only prefecture-level cities are eligible to be divided into districts, and county-level cities are not allowed to be divided into districts. The districts of prefecture-level cities are at the same level as the counties under the city's jurisdiction, and the top leaders are all at the division level.

However, there are differences between districts and counties. The county is relatively large and has an independent economy. The district is positioned as a functional administrative district of the city. The county party secretary is in charge of a party with a large population and a large geographical area. It has extensive and concentrated power and has relatively large influence, while the district party secretary is limited by region and function and has relatively single power.

For example, in our country, the provincial party committee secretaries and the ministers of various national ministries and commissions (except for a few municipalities) are on the same level, but the provincial party committee secretaries are local officials, and they govern government agencies at all levels within the jurisdiction. Everything is ready, just like an "independent kingdom". Ministers of ministries and commissions exercise functional power on behalf of the country and have management and guidance rights in work and business. We can find that many national leaders have local experience, which can illustrate the problem well. Many times, if ministers of ministries and commissions want to further their career, they usually have to serve in local areas. After being trained in the local area, they will have comprehensive experience in governing the country.

The transfer of the top leader at the county level to the top leader in the district is a horizontal transfer and cannot be counted as reuse. The reason for this situation is the need for cadre exchanges. When organizing departments to inspect and train cadres, they need to have experience in multiple positions so that they have comprehensive leadership capabilities. But there are some special circumstances here. For example, the top leaders of some important counties (or county-level cities) sit on the standing committee of the municipal party committee, or are concurrently held by the municipal people's congress, vice chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, deputy secretary of the municipal party committee, and deputy mayor of the municipal government. In this case, the county The top leader is at the deputy department level, which is one level higher than the district leader at the department level. Many times, when the district leader is transferred to the county leader, he is reused. The reason is as I mentioned above.

Taking our Chuzhou City as an example, there are four counties, two cities (county-level cities) and two districts. In principle, their top leaders are all equal, but there are special circumstances. In the early years, the top leaders of Tianchang City had always been members of the Standing Committee of the Chuzhou Municipal Party Committee, so their level was deputy department level. In recent years, the top leader (secretary) of our Dingyuan County is concurrently the deputy director of the Chuzhou People's Congress, so he is also at the deputy department level, which is one level higher than the top leaders of several other counties and cities.

Therefore, the transfer of the county leader of a prefecture-level city to the district leader cannot be regarded as reuse. On the contrary, if the district leader is transferred to the county leader, it is reuse.

In 2015, when I was still a leader, our county magistrate was transferred to a certain district in the city as secretary. At that time, many people sent text messages to congratulate him, and I also sent text messages to congratulate him. Because he and I usually have a relatively good relationship, so sometimes we are informal and talk about everything.

He replied to my text message: "Congratulations! This is a downgrade."

I hurriedly called him to ask what was going on.

He said: "You don't know, although counties and districts are at the same county level, they are completely different!"

I asked him why they are different?

He said: "In a county, the funds that can be used are much more than in the district!"

He said that in the district where the city is located, the land is not under your control, the municipal government Construction projects are managed by the city’s housing and construction department, and many project construction projects are not under your control! I was transferred to the district and appointed as secretary. It seemed that my power was increased, but in fact my power was reduced a lot!

I said, if you move the city (the location of the city), isn’t this getting closer to the center of power?

He said: "This place is right under the eyes of the city leaders. The leaders of any department in the city have more power than you! They will interfere with you in everything."

In the county, the mountains are high and the emperor is far away, so I am the local emperor! "

He gave an example: "If you want to replace the director of the Education Bureau, the Municipal Education Bureau is here and it is up to them! Several key middle schools are also managed by the city, and even the principals are not appointed by the district! Invisibly, my power has been reduced by more than half compared to the county! "

I comforted him and said: "You have nothing to do but nothing to do. You just take advantage of the opportunity of having less power and less to do, learn more and strive for greater progress. "

He said: "Yes! The only advantage is that you are close to the leader and have the opportunity to rise. ”

Sure enough, after more than a year in the city, he was transferred to the municipal party committee general office as secretary-general, deputy department level. Later, he was directly transferred to another city as the organization director.

Any one of the county-level leaders:

The only advantage is: under the eyes of the city leaders, it is easy to promote

Although they are all in the right position, But the power is different. It is not promotion and re-appointment, and the power is much less. But because it is close to the center of power, there are more opportunities for promotion.

Is it promotion and re-appointment when the top leader at the county level is appointed as the district leader? ? If it belongs to a general provincial-level municipality, in fact, serving in a county or serving in a municipal district is not considered promotion. However, in some places, it is classified as re-employment at the same level. However, if the top leader at the county level of a municipality is appointed as the top leader in the district, it is considered promotion. Promotion and reuse.

In fact, there is a big difference between the promotion and reuse of leading cadres. For example, if the administrative deputy position is adjusted to the party deputy position, this is the same level reuse, deputy county The mayor was adjusted to the standing committee of the county committee. Although they are both at the deputy county level, they are also reused at the same level. Within the scope of the same provincial city, there is a difference between municipal districts and municipal counties. Municipal districts belong to the same level. A city's administrative divisions are within the scope of a city, but many of the counties under the city are managed in nature, but in terms of administrative level, they all belong to the county level. Whether they serve in the district or in the county, the administrative level of the top leader is the same. It is at the county level, but due to the working conditions and economic development conditions of municipal districts are better than those of working in the county, and some district governments are located where the municipal party committee is located, and have the function of serving municipal agencies, their status is better than that of the county It is more important, so for the top leaders at the county level to be appointed as top leaders in such districts, there is also the intention of re-employment at the same level.

But in the four major municipalities, any leader at the county level and any leader in the district are the same. It belongs to promotion and reuse. For example, in the district of Chongqing City, the unit level is at the department level, and the county is at the deputy department level. That is, the administrative level of the county is half a level lower than that of the district. If the county party secretary of Chongqing is transferred to the district. The secretary of the party committee, who has been promoted from a deputy department-level cadre to a principal department-level cadre, must follow the relevant regulations and procedures for the selection and appointment of party and government cadres, and perform the procedures used for cadre promotion, that is, motion, democratic recommendation, inspection, publicity, decision, However, when the top leader in a county in a provincial city is transferred to any top leader in a district, there is no need to follow the procedures used for cadre promotion.

To sum up, for the top leaders in counties under provincial municipalities to be transferred to any top leaders in the district, it is a transfer at the same level, and some are reuse at the same level, but it is not promotion; if the top leader at the county level of a municipality directly under the Central Government is Since the administrative level of the district is half a level higher than that of the county, the transfer of any leader in the district does not belong to the general horizontal transfer, but to promotion and reuse, and needs to be handled in accordance with the procedures used for cadre promotion.

Regardless of municipalities and sub-provincial cities, the counties and districts under ordinary prefecture-level cities are all division-level units, and the top leaders, namely the county and district party committee secretaries, are division-level leading cadres. The transfer from county party committee secretary to urban district secretary is equivalent to moving from one current position to another. According to the relevant provisions of the "Regulations on the Selection and Appointment of Party and Government Leading Cadres", this kind of adjustment is a horizontal exchange, and promotion is definitely not considered a promotion. . As for whether to reuse, specific issues need to be analyzed in detail.

The core elements of the evaluation mainly depend on the local weight of the urban area:

1. If it is a relatively high economic level, a relatively large scale, or a national or provincial high-tech industrial center, As well as the urban districts where the municipal administrative center is located, the district party committee secretaries are usually high-ranking deputy department-level leaders, or they are concurrently held by municipal party committee standing committee members or deputy mayors. Even if they are not high-ranking or concurrently held, the next step is to follow the regulations that local cadres cannot use. In the past few years, deputy directors have been promoted. The transfer from the county party secretary to the district party secretary in such an urban area can be regarded as a reuse in terms of organization. Many potential county party secretaries solve hierarchical issues in this way.

2. If it is an urban area with average economic level and size, but the county where it is located is a large county, then the county party secretary of such a county is transferred to the district party secretary. Although the level is the same, the position weight is light. Not only is it not reused, it can also be regarded as "relegation" in a sense. After all, urban areas are not as independent as counties in terms of jurisdiction over people, property and property. Many places are subject to the control of the city, which more or less weakens the power of the district party secretary. To put it more bluntly, if the county party committee secretary can be regarded as a prince, then the urban district secretary can only be regarded as half a prince, let alone an urban area with average economic level and influence. The reason why many urban district secretaries want to become county secretaries has something to do with this.

3. If an ordinary county is adjusted to an ordinary urban area, no matter how you understand it, it can only be regarded as a flat adjustment. Whether there is space in the later period depends on the individual's age, ability and background, etc. It cannot be strictly distinguished whether it is reuse or not.

Prime ministers originate from states and counties. As the "seven-rank sesame official" and "county grandpa" in the past, the county party committee secretary plays a very important role in the stability of grassroots political organizations. His power is a link between the upper and lower levels. He is closely related to the people and the upper levels. His influence, influence and The importance of this level within the system cannot be underestimated. Being able to become the secretary of the county or district committee is already quite good. Which county or district should you choose?

Look at the size. Some district leaders are also members of the municipal standing committee

It depends on the county and district. Generally speaking, the importance of counties is much greater than that of districts. Counties are more independent and work more comprehensively. If there is no level difference, this is probably from an ordinary county to a good district. Otherwise, there will basically not be such a transfer, and it will not be promoted or reused.

Taking an ordinary prefecture-level city as an example, the county party committee secretary and the district party committee secretary are both at the division level, but the transfer of the county party committee secretary to the district party committee secretary is obviously a promotion, but in fact it is an implicit demotion.

First of all, the county's finances are under the direct control of the province, and the economy is more prosperous. Secondly, the county is high in the mountains and the emperor is far away, and the top leader is the local emperor. The district is under the direct management of the city, and there are a lot of department-level leaders, none of whom are better than you. High level. When it comes to hiring and promoting people again, departments and stock levels have the final say, not the city.

Some people say that the district can get closer to the leaders, but this is not necessarily the case. Being close to the water and the towers does not necessarily mean you will get the moon first.

To sum up, many leaders feel aggrieved when the county leader is transferred to the district. Don’t congratulate Gaosheng and flatter him.

Same place In municipalities at the same level, the transfer of the county's top leader to any district leader is generally a horizontal transfer and rotational training. At the same time, it should also be measured based on the size of the county's economic size.

Take Zibo City, Shandong Province as an example. Zibo City has jurisdiction over five districts and three counties. The economic size in order is Zhangdian District, Linzi District, Huantai County, Zhoucun District, Zichuan District, Boshan District, Gaoqing County, and Yiyuan County. Although the exchange of top leaders among these counties is a horizontal transfer, if it is from a county with a small economy to a county with a large economy, it is an invisible reuse, implying that the higher-level party committee fully affirms your previous work.

This is a normal exchange between division-level cadres. There is no way to tell who is the middle and which is the uncle? Under normal circumstances, county party committee secretaries have a five-year term. If they are not promoted, they will be transferred to another county or district under the jurisdiction of a prefecture-level city for exchange of appointments. Counties and districts are at the same level. If a district has a relatively large economy and is located in a prefecture-level administrative center, it can often report work to the leaders of the prefectural and municipal committees. It should be reused or have a greater chance of promotion. It will be easier to enter the deputy positions (deputy department level) of the four sets of teams, otherwise it will be a flat transfer.

It is not promotion, but it can be understood as reuse.

Because at least in terms of level, the top leaders at the county level and the top leaders at the district should be at the same level, both at the division level. Unless there are some important districts, the top leaders at the district level may be concurrently held by deputy leaders at the municipal level.

So it is not accurate to say promotion. So why is it likely to be reused?

Because compared to the district, the county belongs to the type of "the sky is high and the emperor is far away". City leaders may not know many things, nor do they often understand them, so they seem to be very independent, but they have been in the system. Everyone knows that the farther you are from the leader, the less likely you are to be noticed and promoted, unless you can make performance that impresses everyone above and below you.

At this point, district-level leaders have a unique advantage. Although working under the leadership's nose will cause greater work pressure, they have more close contact with city-level leaders and can move around more. If you do more, your work achievements will be seen by the leaders. If you can still keep them in mind, you will be more likely to join the ranks of city leaders in the future.

So, taking a comprehensive look at it, the adjustment of the top leader of the county to the top leader of the district is not a promotion, but it should be a reuse?