Is it right or wrong for Huawei to open the 5G source code to Yingde?

Huawei's 5G technology is well-known in the industry, and even many people are jealous. Is it right or wrong for Huawei to open the 5G source code to Yingde? In fact, Mr. Ren can understand clearly, and he is not worried, because people protect intellectual property rights, just like Android. Although it is open source, everyone can use it, but enterprises have to pay. Mainly in the control of standards and rules. The United States, which complains the most about Huawei, has pushed its own financial rules and dollar standard to the world under the banner of "rebuilding the world" before it has its current hegemony.

The source code of Android comes from linux and belongs to open source software. The source code of Android can't be charged, so it must be open source. However, the services and applications added by Google are copyrighted and can be charged, except for Google services used in almost every country in China or applications based on them, so the key lies in the functions and applications added by Google on Android.

In the case of open source, most enterprises without independent research and development capabilities will choose your technology and products, which can quickly seize the market. When the market adapts to your technical rules (such as Android system, Huawei's 5g standard), then more advanced upstream technology products will be launched. At this time, due to market dependence, other companies have to buy your advanced upstream products, just like the monopoly of Google Android system now. Because Mr. Ren said that 5g is just a piece of cake for Huawei, and Huawei is still developing higher-level technologies, the open source of 5g source code is of great benefit to Huawei.

Moreover, Huawei revealed a big move to German open source code. Huawei's precedent will lead other companies to do the same. At this time, Ericsson, a 5G competitor, is untenable, and even said how Huawei did it, so it opposed it. Ericsson has a large number of factories in China, and a large part of American chips imported by China every year come from such foreign companies. There will be many American components in their equipment. Although Germany's information security regulations are designed to guard against the United States, they are actually designed to guard against the United States. Germany is a model, and European countries may follow suit, so Ericsson is actually opposed, even though it is a European company.

Ericsson is Huawei's biggest 5G competitor. With the "help" of the United States, in 20 18, Ericsson regained the first position in the global telecom equipment sales. However, analyzing the trend of Sino-US relations, there is a high probability that a better outcome will be achieved. Therefore, there is reason to believe that Huawei will still lead next year. ...

Open source is because we can't completely defeat our competitors through technical means, so that others can better integrate your technology and make the improvement of ecological construction possible. After all, in previous decades, we lagged behind other countries in this respect. The construction of 5G can give 6G more inspiration. For China to gain a better advantage in 6G and even artificial intelligence, only with absolute right to speak can it have enough confidence and capital. After all, 5G can't occupy the absolute right to speak. This is a wise choice, but it is hard to say whether Huawei's successor can continue this attitude after retiring.