What are the new regulations for the implementation of old-age property in 2020?

In 2020, the Supreme People's Court issued the "Decision on Amending the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC)", which means that in the new regulations for Lao Lai, there is a provision to delete the list of dishonesty after the case is terminated. It is clearly pointed out in this "Amendment Decision" that after the termination of this execution procedure, the court inquired about the property of the person subjected to execution twice through the network execution inspection and control system, and found no property available for execution. If the applicant executor or others did not provide effective property clues, the information of dishonesty should be deleted within three working days.

To sort out the above judgment means that if the person subjected to execution has no money, the application executor or others have no money information of the person subjected to execution, then the court will delete Lao Lai's information. It is said that this has achieved good legal and social effects in society. After all, we have improved the relief channels and the rules for withdrawing from the untrustworthy list. Simply put, the person subjected to execution has no property execution, and the court should delete the information of dishonesty.

However, this regulation has not been introduced for a long time, and there have been no such cases in the short term. But this execution program is only legal? Is there really no property to enforce? It does not mean that the person subjected to execution actually has absolutely no property available for execution.

Many people agree with this view because there are some restrictions before deleting untrustworthy information. This provision takes into account the balance of interests between the executed person and the executed person to a certain extent, so as to ensure the effective play of the effect of the untrustworthy list system.

However, this decision means that after the execution of the procedure, although the person subjected to execution has not been punished for breach of trust, it is necessary to limit consumption. He can't take high-speed trains and planes, stay in hotels with more than a star rating, and go in and out of nightclubs and golf courses for consumption. I hope that while the law is perfect, we should also consider the interests of the executed person. I don't know what you think of this amendment.