Joke Collection Website - Public benefit messages - Interview experience and skills specially written for UI designers.

Interview experience and skills specially written for UI designers.

First of all, please bring about 2-3 best works you think you have done. Of course, you can bring all the excellent works, but please

Don't bring all the old works. First, if the interviewer asks you questions that you can't answer, you can only say that this is.

I did this a long time ago, but I may have been thoughtless at that time. Isn't it just to lower my score? Second, immature works will be taken out.

Let the interviewer think that you are not "smart". Secondly, the interviewer may compare your renderings with the pages of the final online products.

Compare, why? This depends on your execution and promotion ability, and whether you are a person responsible for your own project.

Of course, there is a gap between the effect map and the online map, which is determined by many factors. The renderings are not necessarily good-looking, but they are general and explanatory.

This person's ability is not good, but we should look at it comprehensively.

Of course, first of all, your renderings should be exquisite, otherwise even the renderings will be unsatisfactory, and the online pages will only be ugly and not beautiful.

Whether it is available or not, we explain in the second point that these two points are the basis of experience.

Just cut two pictures. Excellent works include but are not limited to pages. It can be seen from your works that you are a designer.

Ideas and ideas, and how to implement them. Take an App project as an example. Why is the interface designed like this? page

Layout, control position, font size, etc. What is the basis of your design? Analyze your color from the perspective of visual specialty.

If I were an interviewer, I would ask a few questions about my job:

1. Please tell me about your design method, that is, thinking, exploring, researching, testing and verifying during design? 2. How did you get the inspiration and how did you carry it out?

3. How to unify the visual style when designing product modules by multiple people?

4. Please explain the color matching of this product in detail (don't say this is the product color).

five ....

There are still many questions that can be asked. I just mention them here to tell you that in a perfect and exquisite work, I think.

In fact, there are many routines that can be landed, and it is not a slap in the face. If you can only be ambiguous about these questions.

Answer, that shows that your design thinking is still very shallow. What the interviewer wants to know is the idea and practice behind your work.

A good interviewer can see your design skills at a glance. They don't need to know your design skills, but they do.

Know your design thinking and how to work as a team. Because the first sight of design is visual presentation, only visual presentation can pass.

After that, you can continue to be asked the following questions, just like you don't have good equipment, and the skills of cattle people are also a Boss.

Call for death.

An excellent portfolio should do the following:

First of all, excellent logical ability. What the interviewer wants to know here is how the designer participated in the creation of a product from scratch.

Among them, how did the designer implement a design scheme from deduction to landing? Your design scheme should be reasonable.

According to, cause and effect.

For example, I asked several questions in the previous interview:

Me: Please tell me, what is the design process of the links you participate in the project? Interviewer: According to the prototype given by interaction design, analyze the requirements to see if they are reasonable, and formulate visual norms after thinking before implementation.

Me: How do you analyze the demand? Interviewer: Understand the background and purpose of the demand, analyze it in combination with the user's usage scenario, put yourself in the other's shoes, and design it in combination with your own experience.

Me: How to observe with empathy?

Interviewer: ...

Me: Do you think the product you designed has a good user experience? Why? Interviewee: Good. I think the usability and usability of the product are very good.

Me: What do you think is the good basis?

Interviewer: ...

So we often find that interviewers like to ask questions backwards, hoping to find the initial starting point of your design and also want to see you.

Are the design ideas and methods complete? The interviewer wants you to speak with data, not your own subjective thinking and ability.

A powerful interviewer can tell the truth clearly from an objective point of view. UI design requires logical ability, and one more thing.

Because you need the ability to sort out business logic. Your poor logical ability means that you can't completely sort out your career.

I forgot here, but I don't understand there.

Then there is the ability to express. How can a person with poor expression skills communicate with products and development on the problems encountered in the project?

Questions, in order to express communication skills, interviewers usually ask several questions:

If we say that it is more dangerous to work overtime to catch up with the progress. Because what the interviewer really wants to know here is that there is such a problem.

Question, in your opinion, what is the essential question? Instead of treating the symptoms, we should think about whether there are problems in previous communication, such as

How to avoid similar problems next time?

What is investigated here is the ability of designers to deal with negative feedback, and how to quickly adjust their mentality and then cooperate.

Work. Design is often not perfect. I believe that designers who can't pass the first draft are ubiquitous and sometimes difficult to adjust, not just

It's just that you need to have a good ability to deal with negative feedback, and you also need to speak according to it in design. For example: my place

The reason for this design is that through 200 representative sample surveys, 90% of users think this design is in line with them.

Compared with the original experience after usability testing, it is expected that the efficiency and satisfaction will be greatly improved. Don't be afraid of this.

Did someone say that your design is not good?

The compression resistance and decomposition ability here are well understood:

1. What if I receive multiple requirements at the same time?

2. What are the skills and experiences in multithreading?

3. What should I do after the project is postponed or advanced?

4. What do you think of overtime?

5. Talk about the most difficult thing you encountered in the design process and how to solve it.

I won't go into details here, because everyone has different experiences and different solutions to the above problems.

People are alive after all. I hope you will consider it carefully. When the interviewer asks you this question, what kind of answer do you want to hear?

Answer.

We prefer to work with smart people because communication can be simple and efficient. Smart people usually show these things.

Features:

1. Self-awareness and learning ability are outstanding, and I know how to make rapid progress in projects and things by using my own advantages and abilities.

Line evaluation, and produce optimized strategy.

2. Careful logic and jumping thinking. Usually when you say the first sentence to him, he can understand the essential question you want to ask.

Solving the answer will greatly improve the efficiency of communication, won't it?

3. curiosity is heavy. Smart people are always full of curiosity. They are interested in the people around him, food and learning tools.

Fashion trends, everything they don't understand, and a strong thirst for knowledge. Strong learning ability, but not bad.

His curiosity is not enough, his knowledge is limited, and it is even more impossible to discover new things and pay attention to them.

4. Attitude towards things and opinions. Sometimes we tend to stick to our attitude because of one thing, even if it is.

Things and your point of view are wrong. When there is evidence that they are wrong, you can change your attitude towards things.

Attitudes and changing wrong views are actually not easy.

5. Be kind to others. Smart people are low-key people and high-profile people. They are humble and open-minded, but

These may not be seen in the interview. I have met some interviewers who think highly of themselves and can't let go.

Skeptical attitude and self-confidence, but it is difficult for such people to handle things objectively and express their views on the company.

Not good for the team and the team.

Usually this is the end of the interview, but the egg question is not limited to the last question. You can even ask questions at any time.

From the beginning of the interview, I will also look at the interviewer's manners, clothes and conversation to see if this person conforms to the culture of our team.

Atmosphere, such as our team, is a very funny and open atmosphere. If the interviewer is tight, they can't afford to make jokes.

People, it is difficult to integrate into our team. You will be randomly asked questions about eggs: For example, do you know the deepest egg in the world?

What is the name of the trench? What's your favorite AJ? Why? What are the types of handmade products? What brand do you like? why

What?

What kind of illustrations are popular in chasing waves? What books do you usually read? What impressed you the most in the latest book?

What? And so on all the questions that may be asked, this is also to examine whether your knowledge is broad and whether you have the same interests to talk about.

To the point. The reason why you follow the word luck is also exquisite. Sometimes you will find one of your eggs.

Good answer, you can get a lot of points, maybe you will be recruited!

I believe that at this point, many friends can also know why UI work is so difficult to find now. Everyone is climbing up and becoming famous.

Well, that's all. Why do you ask companies to give you opportunities instead of those who work harder than you? All you have to do is.

It is continuous learning and planned learning. Don't go home after work LOL doesn't invite friends to dinner after work; Don't think that you

What are the advantages, even if you have advantages; Don't be a rabbit in the tortoise-hare race.