Liang Rongcai's case review

At 8: 18 am on November 21st, 211, Liang Rongcai and her friends entered the classroom and began to have breakfast. At 28: , Liang Rongcai's boyfriend received a short message from Liang Rongcai saying that she wanted to go to the toilet every time she had an English class.

At about p>1: 2, Liang Rongcai was found dead in the ladies' room. Subsequently, Dongguan Songshan Lake Public Security Bureau received an alarm.

According to the family of the deceased, Liang Rongcai's fatal wound was concentrated in his head, in which the back of his head was severely damaged and he finally bled to death. When the deceased was found, his lower body was bare, but no semen spots were found in the autopsy.

three days after fleeing, on November 23rd, 211, the suspect Ao Xiang surrendered himself at the Guangzhou Yuexiu District Branch Square Police Station.

On the afternoon of May 24th, 212, Dongguan Intermediate People's Court passed the first-instance verdict on the murder case of the girls' toilet in Dongguan University of Technology, and sentenced the defendant Ao Xiang to death with a two-year suspension and compensation of RMB 58,799.5. After getting the verdict, Liang Xianbin, the father of the murdered female student, said that he could not accept the verdict and would apply to the procuratorate to lodge a protest. After receiving the judgment, the defendant Ao Xiang said that he would obey the judgment and not appeal. On the day of the verdict, the Liang family entrusted an attorney to apply to the Dongguan People's Procuratorate for a protest.

On May 3th, 212, Dongguan People's Procuratorate issued a written reply saying that it did not support its protest application. Liang Xianbin received a phone call from Dongguan Procuratorate in the afternoon, asking him to go to the procuratorate. In the written reply presented to him by the procuratorate, he wrote: "According to the provisions of Article 182 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, after examination, our court believes that a trial is by no means a case of obviously improper sentencing and is determined not to protest. According to the lawyer's analysis, if the procuratorate does not support the protest, the normal legal procedure of the criminal part has been completed, and then it depends on whether the victim's family will appeal.

On January 7, 213, the Guangdong Provincial High Court publicly pronounced the case of Ao Xiang, a college student in Dongguan University of Technology, who intentionally killed and forced to molest a woman with a suspended death sentence, and ruled to approve the first-instance judgment of the Dongguan Intermediate People's Court. The Guangdong Higher People's Court reviewed that the original judgment found the facts clear, the conviction was accurate and the sentence was appropriate, and ruled that the defendant Ao Xiang's death sentence was approved.