Can mobile phone recording be used as evidence in law?

Legal analysis: Yes. In order to make the recorded evidence the basis of the judgment, three conditions must be met at the same time:

First, the recorded evidence produced by the parties has not been spliced, edited or forged, and it is closely connected before and after, and the content has not been tampered with, which is objective, true and coherent.

Two, the acquisition of recorded evidence must comply with the law. Recording evidence holders who use methods that infringe on others' privacy or violate the prohibition of laws, such as eavesdropping in their workplaces or residences, are evidence obtained in violation of the prohibition of laws and cannot be used as litigation evidence.

Three, the other party did not refute or refute the reason is not established. When the court takes the recorded evidence as the basis for judging a case, it should also examine whether there are doubts about the recorded evidence. If the other party questions the recorded data and provides sufficient evidence to refute it, then the recorded evidence will lose its probative force; If there is not enough evidence to refute it, the court shall confirm the probative force of the recorded evidence.

Legal basis: Article 63 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) includes:

(a) Statements of the parties;

(2) Documentary evidence;

(3) Physical evidence;

(4) Audio-visual materials;

(5) Electronic data;

(6) Testimony of witnesses;

(7) Appraisal opinions;

(8) Records of the inquest.

Evidence must be verified before it can be used as a basis for ascertaining facts.