What do you think of the announcement that "relatives in the collateral can't take the exam within three generations of concealing the itinerary" apologizes and announces the cancellation?

The latest policy of epidemic prevention and control announcement issued by Chengde High-tech Zone has aroused heated public discussion, and it is clearly stated in the policy that those who deliberately conceal their itinerary are included in the list of dishonesty. There are also a series of primary strict epidemic prevention policies, which caused widespread dissatisfaction among the public after the announcement was issued. Subsequently, this announcement was withdrawn and the relevant departments also apologized. It is reported that the epidemic prevention and control department in this area issued the epidemic policy privately without the permission of the superior.

The epidemic situation in China is still very serious, and there are some infected cases in many areas. Although epidemic prevention and control is a very serious work, it is necessary to formulate strict policies to urge the masses to do a good job in epidemic prevention and control. However, when setting penalties, it should also be decided as appropriate, rather than abusing the blacklist of dishonesty. Many methods and measures in this epidemic prevention and control policy in Chengde High-tech Zone are very unreasonable, and the punishment for relevant epidemic-related personnel is too great.

China has clear laws and regulations on the prevention and control of infectious diseases, and the local authorities can act according to the law, instead of setting up various policies to punish epidemic-related personnel without authorization. In particular, the inclusion of people who conceal their itinerary in the blacklist of dishonesty will have a great impact on the lives of individuals and their relatives. Concealing the itinerary is illegal and can be punished in accordance with the existing laws and regulations of our country. Perhaps the original intention of this policy is to strengthen the prevention and control of local epidemic, but the means are really too extreme. Although epidemic prevention and control work is very important, we should also consider whether the normal life of local people will be affected by epidemic prevention and control.

fortunately, this policy has not been implemented, otherwise it should cause a lot of dissatisfaction among local people and cause unnecessary social unrest. The relevant departments do have the right to formulate some epidemic prevention and control policies suitable for the local area, but this does not mean that they can go beyond the scope permitted by law. Xiaobian reminds netizens here that if they encounter similar situations, they should complain to the local authorities.