Joke Collection Website - Public benefit messages - The court informed the case that "the teenager was besieged to death". What information is worth paying attention to in this case?

The court informed the case that "the teenager was besieged to death". What information is worth paying attention to in this case?

I'm sure you all know that this case happened in Jiangxi Province of our country, and many people were involved, because this case will still have a great impact on this boy of 16 years old. Judging from the judgment of Jiangxi Intermediate People's Court, we will comprehensively and objectively examine the truth and evidence of the case and give Wu Mou justice according to law. A fair verdict is that eight people attacked Wu Mou in Ji 'an and other areas. In this case, 16-year-old Wu Mou fought back with a knife and killed one person. Therefore, people are very concerned about whether this case belongs to excessive defense. After all, a 16-year-old boy is not yet an adult, and his behavior has been tried. The verdict was 10 years in prison, but considering this case, it aroused strong concern in society. Therefore, the second trial was held in Jilin Province, and some details and problems at that time were examined and investigated very carefully, as was Wu Mou's behavior. The court finally found that it was a crime of intentional injury, and it also participated in the affray, which had a very bad influence on society. So this kind of thing still bears criminal responsibility together. The second trial held that Wu Mou's behavior formed a special defense, but it still belonged to excessive defense, because he could fully explain his behavior in essence, and finally chose to pronounce the sentence on an optional date through identification, material evidence and various information. After all, he is a minor. Our country still protects minors, because his situation can be said to be experienced by many young people. Therefore, his trial may be a warning to many young people, and it may also be a standard. Therefore, there is a lot of information in this case that deserves our attention, especially the verdict against Wu Mou.