Why do retail investors not recommend buying ETFs?

Why do retail investors not recommend buying ETFs?

Why do retail investors not recommend buying ETFs? I am here to give you a unified reply today: I personally don't recommend doing ETFs in the industry. Presumably, this answer will surprise many people, who obviously expect the price of exchange-traded funds in _ _ _ industry to rise, or expect to compete in Big bounce. And you told me not to buy an industry ETF?

Listen to my reasons:

1. One of the important reasons why people choose industry ETFs is that they hope to step on the hot plate and get excess returns, but many times they will find that it backfires. One of the main reasons is that many ordinary investors chasing hot spots or theme concepts can easily catch up with high positions, but the essence of market operation is to ambush at low positions and sell when they rise, and many ordinary investors are the most likely to take orders at high positions on impulse. The idea is beautiful, and the reality is very skinny.

2. For industry ETFs, in many industries, you will find that both Dragon and Yilong II in this plate are concentrated in the head, while the performance of other targets is not so good. Recently, Wang Wei, a BOC fund, also mentioned that if there are no high-quality listed companies at the top, the increase will be very different. In fact, many industries are also the same. For example, the well-known securities ETF can be seen from the increase in holdings of various securities in the fourth quarter. Now many brokers are also very divided, which also reflects that many sectors have such differentiation. Especially in the past two years, the structural market is very serious, and this differentiation is not a short-term thing, but a long-term thing.

We all know that Zhang Kun's style pays more attention to consumption. Even the recent retreat of small and medium-sized enterprises has made many people ridicule that Zhang Kun only buys liquor. Is that so?

We all know that many people will choose to spend ETF or spend 50 or liquor ETF, and if we compare the trend chart of small and medium-sized stocks (starting from Zhang Kun) with the deep consumption and liquor index of Zhang Kun E Fund, we will find that the performance of small and medium-sized stocks of E Fund in the past far outperforms these two indexes. And the increase gap is very obvious.

We are comparing the medical industry, Gü len's China-Europe medical innovation and biomedical ETF and its medical index. We can see that since August of 19, Gulen's China-Europe medical innovation and China-Europe medical health have greatly outperformed the biomedical index and its medical index.

After comparing consumption and medicine, let's take a look at another high-quality track, that is, new energy sources of science and technology. We compare the indices of Kechuang 50, new energy vehicles and their lithium batteries with those of Zhou Yingbo, the pioneer of China-Europe era, and Huang Wanjia, and find that these two active management funds have greatly outperformed the indices of Kechuang and its new energy.

You can't buy ETF funds for the following reasons;

1, the minimum subscription share of ETF funds is usually relatively large, and it is difficult for ordinary investors to subscribe in this way.

2. In order to fund on the trading floor of the stock exchange, investors can only purchase through the brokerage platform and need to open an on-site fund account.

3. Fund trading can only be conducted at the opening time of the stock market.

There are only a few reasons.

1, I don't know. I didn't even know there was such a thing as an ETF. Even though I have been trading in 10 for 20 years, I have never heard of ETF. This is called ignorance, which means not knowing.

2. I think the ETF is rising too slowly, and the stock is not rising as fast. Is that really the case? In 2000, CSI Liquor 16 times, CSI Consumption 16 times in 2007, Medicine 10 times in 2000, and Low Wave 10 times in 2000. Even the stinkiest SSE 50 has increased by 30 times in the first half of this year.

3.ETF is not stimulating and there is no daily limit. Hit the board, the daily limit, how exciting. I don't rule out making a fortune in the short term, but ask yourself, is it you?

Do you play board for fun? This is what big organizations rob you of. I was smug when I caught a few boards, and I felt that I had found the trick of playing the board and I had to return it sooner or later. You can't take it with you.

What makes you feel like one in a million?

People who always think they are smarter than others are mostly cannon fodder.

When you admit that you are mediocre, you start to make money, but it is difficult.

How many people who enter the stock market will admit that they are mediocre?

4.ETF is boring. Yes, ETFs are really boring. Buy when the valuation is low, wait, then sell when the valuation is high, and do nothing at other times.

Good trading is boring, and the biggest difficulty in investing lies in the "art of waiting", that is, waiting all the time, buying when it is cheap and selling when it is expensive.

Isn't this the most suitable for retail investors?

What should I do? I don't have to study individual stocks, read financial statements, pay attention to the announcements of listed companies, pay attention to trends and industry development, and read nothing. Not good? Not good?

There is no research on industries and individual stocks in 8- 10 years. Do you think you really understand?

Even if you study for 8 years 10, do you think you must be right?

The big blue-chip market in 2007, the small and medium-sized board market in 2009, and the technology media market of 15 have been changing. When you get the industry completely, the sun goes down and it is empty. After a few times, this life is gone. Is it really worth it?

Ma sold his QQ for 654.38+0 million, and no one wanted it. The chairman of the listed company doesn't know the future direction. Are you an outsider sure that you can really understand the future of the company?

China stock market is littered with rubbish, and there will be no more than 200 valuable companies among 3,600 listed companies, which means that 3,400 companies will experience mean regression at any time.