College student pyramid scheme case mock court script (urgent)

Mock Small Court Script - Campus Theft

[Clerk]: Whether the plaintiff and his attorney are present in court, and whether the defendant and his attorney are present in court, court discipline is now announced:

1. Please close all communication tools, and no audio, video or photography is allowed.

2. Applause, making noise, and other behaviors that impede trial activities are not allowed;

3. Speeches or questions are not allowed without the permission of the judge;

4. Those who disturb the order of the court, such as making noises, attacking the court, insulting, and beating the judges, will be investigated for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law, and fines will be imposed if the circumstances are minor.

[Clerk]: Please all stand up. Invite the presiding judge and judges to enter the court. (The presiding judge and the judges take their seats in turn.)

[Presiding Judge]: Please take a seat, everyone.

[Clerk] The court preparations are ready, please instruct the court to open.

Trial 1: The Criminal Tribunal of Classes 5 and 6 of Huanghe Road No. 2 Primary School is now in session. The defendant Han Liu was summoned to court. (The bailiff took the defendant Han Liu to the dock.)

Jian: What is your name? Date of birth? :nationality? place of birth? Educational level? Home address?

By: Korean Wave. September 21, 1997. Chinese. Shenzhen, Guangdong. Currently studying in the sixth grade of elementary school. XX.

Trial: Have you ever received any legal punishment before?

Quiet: None.

Trial: When was he criminally detained this time?

Quiet: October 10th.

Trial: When was he arrested?

Quiet: October 30th.

Trial: Has the Shenzhen Luofang Primary School Procuratorate received the indictment?

Received by: Received.

Review: When will it be received?

Been: Ten days ago.

Trial: The Juvenile Court of Shenzhen Luofang Elementary School is now here to hear the Korean Wave theft case of Luofang Elementary School in Shenzhen in accordance with the law. According to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the defendant enjoys the following rights during the trial:

1. If the above-mentioned persons have an interest in the case and affect justice, they may request to be replaced.

2． The defendant may defend himself.

Trial: The court investigation will now begin. First, the prosecutor reads out the indictment.

Public: (Station)

Shenzhen Luofang Primary School Procuratorate's Indictment

The defendant Han Liu, male, born on September 21, 1997, Han nationality, currently studying Luo Fang is in the sixth grade of Shenzhen Primary School and is from Shenzhen, Guangdong. After legal review, it was found that:

The defendant Han Liu, together with Zhang San, a student from other classes (has been dealt with in a separate case), took advantage of the plaintiff Han Liu at the Happy Garden of Luofang Elementary School at about 5 pm on October 8, 2008. Liu accidentally stole his schoolbag that was lying on the ground. After stealing a Parker pen and RMB 50 in cash, he threw the schoolbag into the toilet on the third floor and fled with the stolen goods. After the incident, the public security organs recovered 50 yuan in cash and pens from the defendant Han Liu (both were temporarily deposited in this court).

The above facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive and sufficient to confirm.

This court believes that the defendant Han Liu colluded with others to use theft methods to steal other people's property, which constituted the crime of theft. In order to strictly enforce the law and safeguard citizens' legitimate property rights, in accordance with the provisions of Article 141 of the "Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China", a public prosecution will be initiated and the person shall be punished in accordance with the law.

Trial: This court is now investigating the criminal facts alleged in the indictment.

Trial: Defendant Han Liu, did you understand the indictment just read out by the prosecutor?

Answer: I understand.

Review: Do you want to revise the statement?

Answer: No modification.

Mr.: When did you arrive at the school’s Happy Garden?

Be: After school, about 4:50.

Mr.: What are you here for?

Been: played.

Mr.: Why did you think of stealing money after arriving at Happy Garden?

Being: Because I saw no one next to the schoolbag on the ground, I just wanted to see what was inside, and I didn’t want to steal it.

Mr.: Who thought of taking away the money and pen from the schoolbag?

By: me.

Mr.: What are you going to do after you steal it?

Quiet: I haven’t thought about it.

Private: What about Zhang San (accomplice)?

Be: He was watching to see if anyone was coming.

Mr.: What did you steal?

Quiet: 50 yuan in cash and a pen.

Private: Who gets the money and goods?

By: me.

Mr.: The interrogation is over.

Trial: Defender, do you need to ask questions to the defendant? (The presiding judge asked the defendant’s defense lawyer.)

Defense: Yes.

Trial: Defender, you can now question the defendant.

Discrimination: Do you usually go home on time after school?

Quiet: Yes.

Discussion: Have you ever taken other people’s things privately before?

Quiet: Never.

Discrimination: How is your usual academic performance?

Quick: B average grade.

Bian: Do you often go to Internet cafes?

Quiet: Never.

Discrimination: The interrogation is completed.

Trial: The plaintiff and defendant may apply for supplementary interrogation or questions.

Original and quilt: none.

Trial: Next, the prosecutor will present evidence to the court.

Public: The prosecutor asked the court to summon witness XXX to the court.

Trial: This court allows witness XXX to appear in court. (The bailiff takes the witness to the witness stand.)

Trial: What is your name?

Certificate: XXX.

Reviewer: Age?

Certificate: 9 years old.

Reviewer: Class?

Certificate: Class 3, Grade 4.

Trial: According to the law, witnesses should provide testimony truthfully. Those who intentionally commit perjury or conceal criminal evidence will bear legal responsibility. Witness XXX, can you guarantee that you will testify truthfully?

Certificate: Yes.

Trial: Witnesses please sign the guarantee form. (As soon as the juror takes out the bond, let the witness sign it.)

Trial: Prosecutor, you can now ask questions to the witness.

Mr.: Can you state the situation again.

Certificate: At about 5:20 pm on October 8, 2008, I was playing in the Happy Garden. I saw two people carrying schoolbags, but they suddenly grabbed their other schoolbag from the ground and ran quickly to Teaching building. I followed them to the toilet on the third floor and hid aside. I saw them dumping everything in their schoolbags on the ground, taking a pen and a piece of money and running away.

Mr.: Were the two people you saw at the scene?

Certificate: Yes. That's him. (The witness points his finger at the defendant.)

Public: Questions are over.

Trial: Defendant, do you have any objection to the witness’s testimony?

Quiet: None.

Trial: Witness XXX left the court.

Trial: The prosecutor can continue to present evidence.

Public: Now read out the plaintiff’s testimony: (Plaintiff reads out)

Witness testimony

At around 5 pm on October 8, 2008, I was playing in Happy Garden , when I was about to leave, I discovered that my schoolbag was missing. I immediately reported it to the brigade headquarters. After a search by the brigade headquarters, I found books scattered on the floor in the toilet on the third floor. After I checked, I found that a Parker pen and the 50 yuan I was going to pay for magazines were missing.

Plaintiff: Tang Hao

November 20, 2000

Trial: Does the defendant have any objections to the witness testimony?

Quiet: None.

Trial: What objections does the defense have to the witness’s testimony?

Defense: No.

Trial: The prosecutor continued to present evidence to the court.

Public: The recovered items are now submitted to the court: (The bailiff will present the Parker pen and 50 yuan enclosed in a plastic bag.)

Trial: The defendant and defender What objections are there to the physical evidence?

Be, argue: No.

Trial: Does the prosecutor have any other evidence to submit to the court?

Mr.: The proof is complete.

Trial: Does the defendant have any evidence to submit to the court?

Quiet: None.

Trial: Defender, do you have any evidence to submit to the court?

Debate: No.

Trial: The court investigation is over, and now the court debate begins, with the prosecutor speaking first.

Public: As a public prosecutor, we prosecuted the Hallyu theft case. The evidence in this case is conclusive and the facts of the case are clear. The defendant was still very young and should have a happy and beautiful life through his hard work, but the defendant tried to get something for nothing and embarked on a criminal path. In order to educate prisoners and strictly enforce the law, we request the court to severely punish the defendant. Finally, the jury was asked to punish the defendant with 40 hours of community service and to clean the classroom for two weeks.

Defended: Dear presiding judge and people’s jurors, we are lawyers from Luo Fang Law Firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the Lawyers Law, we accept the entrustment of Hallyu to serve as his defense lawyer to defend him. Before the trial, the defender had a basic understanding of the case through meetings with the defendant. He had just listened to the court's investigation of the case and had a further understanding of the case. First of all, I have no objection to the evidence presented by the prosecutor, but I need to clarify a few points.

First, my client has always performed well in school and has excellent academic performance; second, he has never stolen; third, he is honest and kind. , he is filial to his parents and never goes to Internet cafes; fourth, he has been commended by the school for his generous money. Fifth, my client is currently only a primary school student, has received relatively little legal and discipline education, and has a weak legal concept. But I’m not saying that if you don’t understand the law, you shouldn’t be punished by the law. But if he knew the law, the result might not be like this. After being arrested, my client confessed to the public security organs that he had a good attitude and had no criminal record. The court is requested to consider the above points and grant a lighter sentence.

Original argument: Does the defendant’s lawyer mean that if you don’t understand the law, you should not be punished by law?

Defended: Of course that is not what I meant, but the law is nothing more than human kindness. I ask the court to take this into consideration when sentencing.

Original explanation: We do have deep sympathy for the defendant, but sympathy cannot replace the law. On the contrary, we believe that only by severely punishing the defendant can we truly educate the defendant and truly solve the problem fundamentally. . Theft often occurs among teenagers. Vanity, greed for petty gains, negative social influence, and lax family discipline will all cause them to contract bad habits. If they are not educated and corrected in time, they will embark on the path of crime. If the defendants are not severely punished this time, then there will be more Korean Waves (defendant’s name)!

Discriminated: When dealing with student theft incidents, we cannot be simple and hasty. We must be good at analysis and take appropriate measures to solve them. For students who commit theft, we should start with ideological education, follow the guidance and take advantage of the situation, so that they can realize the seriousness and harm of the mistakes they have made, and give them the opportunity to correct their mistakes and correct themselves. As long as he takes the initiative to return the stolen goods, he should be given a lighter sentence.

Original explanation: The problem of theft on campus is becoming more and more serious and is on the rise. This cannot but attract our attention. Theft harms young people and harms families and society. If it is not discovered and stopped in time, thieves on campus today will You may become a big thief in tomorrow's society!

Discriminated: The plaintiff’s lawyer is right. However, the key is that after the theft occurs, what attitude we adopt to deal with this problem is crucial! Take the above case, imagine that after the case occurs, if we simplify things, the result will be that the person involved will be expelled from the school for breaking the law, and then the student may be pushed into society and become a social youth and unable to continue studying. Therefore, we should adopt a "heart-attacking" method of dealing with it, moving it emotionally and understanding it rationally, so that the students with bad moral character will be shocked mentally, feel guilty, and take the initiative to withdraw the stolen goods and return them to the owner. In this way, it gave him a chance to change his ways and learn from this incident so that he could continue to complete his studies and become a pillar of the country in the future.

Original defense: (Silence, speechless)

Trial: (Ask original defense) Does the defender have any new defense?

Original definition: No.

Trial: The court debate ends. Defendant, you can now make a brief statement on the facts and evidence of this case, the existence and severity of the crime, your understanding of the crime, and your requirements for conviction and sentencing.

Quiet: I just wanted to go to Happy Land, not to steal anything. Later, I found a rather beautiful schoolbag on the ground. Out of curiosity, I walked over to take a look. At this time, (accomplice) Zhang San said to simply take away the schoolbag. I had no idea that my actions were causing harm to others. I ask the court for a lighter sentence. (Play)

Trial: The court is adjourned now, and the verdict will be pronounced in court after the collegial panel conducts deliberations.

(The presiding judge discussed with the two jurors for a while respectively)

Trial: The trial will continue now. Now for the verdict: This court believes that the defendant Hallyu stole other people's property, which constituted the crime of theft. The fact that defendant Han Liu committed the crime of theft is clear, the evidence is conclusive and sufficient, and the accusation is supported. After all, the defendant in this case is still a minor, with naive and simple thoughts. Sometimes he is driven by vanity or interests, and he will inevitably have greedy and petty gains. However, as long as we use proper education methods, he can be saved. In view of the fact that the defendant Han Liu had a good attitude of pleading guilty after being brought to justice, this court decided to give the defendant a lighter punishment. The verdict is as follows:

[Clerk]: Please all stand. (Station)

Trial: 1. The defendant Han Liu was guilty of theft and was sentenced to 30 hours of community welfare service, and was required to clean the classroom of his class for a week, and return the stolen items in court.

2. The verdict will be announced orally today, and the verdict will be delivered within 5 days after the court closes. If you are not satisfied with the judgment, you can appeal through this court or directly to the Luofang Elementary School Juvenile Intermediate Court within ten days from the second day after receiving the judgment. If the appeal is made in writing, one original and two copies of the appeal shall be submitted.