Which is better for the college entrance examination, which is better for the college entrance examination, and which is better for the five or three brush questions?

"college entrance examination must brush questions" PK "five-year college entrance examination three-year simulation"

The following comments only represent the opinions of the individuals and partners who helped me evaluate them. If you have any other comments, please correct them in the comments section. The full marks of the following evaluations are all 10 for cumulative statistical comparison.

Topic quality. "Must brush questions" 8, "May 3" 9

1 and "May 3rd" are hard-core materials for collecting real college entrance examination questions in recent five years and some simulated questions in various provinces and cities in recent three years. In some respects, the quality of test questions is absolutely up to standard, and its powerful question bank will undoubtedly greatly enhance its authority in the eyes of users. By contrast.

2. The "required questions" mostly use the simulation questions of some excellent high schools in China. Although it also involves the real questions of the college entrance examination, it is still worse than "53" in terms of the size and object of the question bank, so the comprehensive evaluation of "53" is a narrow victory.

Topic innovation. "May 3rd" 4, "Must Brush" 6

1, to put it bluntly, both "May 3rd" and "Must Brush Topics", as well-known carrier materials, have great shortcomings in originality. The first is "May 3rd". I never know how I dare to say that I have been innovating such information. I just need to collect the college entrance examination questions regularly every year.

2. Collect the simulation questions from all provinces and cities, bind them into a thick set of questions, and then put them on the market for gold. I just want to ask, our school often has simulation questions. I will buy you. Am I full? It's not that these questions are not good, just that they belong to their own question bank a little bit, and there is no need to follow the original volume even if there are answers to some questions (this question will be mentioned later).

3, and "must brush the questions" is obviously smart. After finding some real questions and simulation questions, don't forget to come up with some original questions or original series of questions to make up for your own shortcomings. Alas, if you choose a tall one among the dwarfs, let's take the "must brush the questions" as an example.

Topic classification and integration. "May 3rd" 7 "Required Questions" 8

1, both of them are bosses who brush the subject material. With years of management and typesetting experience, they have done this very well.

2, but I really don't want to vomit five or three. To say that it is a special training does not mean that when choosing simulation questions, you will often put some questions that have been practiced. We brush information to find out our knowledge loopholes and abilities, and we don't know if we have obsessive-compulsive disorder or something. I can't tolerate this phenomenon of filling in the blanks with some sub-questions.

3. The "required questions" are well done, and each topic is also carefully divided. What is commendable is that every question that is forced to brush is more or less different from the previous question, and efforts have been made to ensure that the questions are not repeated. Even if it is the same knowledge point, you can test new tricks. To be honest, I feel that brushing the questions all the way will be more rewarding.

abstract

1, the comprehensive score of "May 3rd" is 58, and "Required Questions" is 68. "Must Brush Questions" won by a big score.

2. Although there are many subjective factors in this evaluation, which may be criticized by many people, in fact, what I want to tell you is that from the beginning, the positioning of "May 3rd" and "Must Brush Questions" is different.

3. "May 3rd", as a senior teaching assistant, has always occupied an important position in the minds of countless people who brush questions, while "compulsory questions for college entrance examination" has gradually broadened its own market by virtue of its wide range of use and flexible and innovative forms, and has always had a good reputation in the hearts of students.

However, despite this, there are still many shortcomings in the compulsory topics. For example, for liberal arts and Chinese and English topics, there is no systematic and comprehensive summary of the required topics, and as a peer, Wusan has been at the forefront in related aspects. Especially in English, the English summary on May 3rd was very strong, and interested friends can also experience it.