How to remember the new code for primary school students

The Ministry of Education recently announced the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students (Draft for Comments)" to solicit opinions from the public. The reporter made a comparison and found that unlike Article 40 of the current "Code of Daily Conduct for Middle School Students" which states "Be courageous when it comes to justice, dare to fight, and discourage behaviors that violate social morality", the draft for comments deleted "Be brave when it comes to justice" Related content emphasizes "Be able to protect yourself, know how to ask for help, stay away from drugs, and cherish life." This has become the focus of attention from all parties.

Please share your views on the changes in the Code and write an argumentative essay.

The reasons for the change can be discussed:

1. In the old version of the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students", from the perspective of regulating student behavior and ideological and moral standards, there is no doubt that every content is politically very important. Correct and morally noble. However, the content is too slogan-like, slogan-like, and hollow, and the language is too blunt, making it difficult for primary and secondary school students to remember. It is almost difficult to operate, loses operability, and is out of touch with the atmosphere.

The new version of the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" deletes blunt and empty contents such as "love the party and the people," "love nature," and "have the courage to act for justice and dare to fight." At the same time, the content has been modified to be more detailed and humane. This kind of change of one deletion and one change actually combines the actual life of primary and secondary school students, making it easier for primary and secondary school students to remember, understand, and more operable. In the words of the Ministry of Education It is to make students “within reach”. In essence, the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" bids farewell to the unrealistic and empty slogan-making practices and thinking of the past, and it is a down-to-earth revision.

2. The new code is based on the original one, with clearer classifications and some added content, such as controlling online time, resisting bad information, insisting on physical exercise, and maintaining a sunny mentality. The former is a requirement for civilized surfing the Internet, while the latter is from the perspective of caring about students' physical and mental health. In view of the general decline in students' physical fitness and low psychological quality, it is proposed to insist on exercising and maintain a sunny mentality. It is a requirement for students, and it is also a kind of lifestyle and mentality advocacy for students to establish since childhood, which reflects the care and love for young people.

In the new era

students’ lives, health and safety cannot be effectively guaranteed, and student safety accidents occur frequently. The most typical example is that every year many primary and secondary school students die due to fires, car accidents, Death by drowning. One of the reasons is that safety education

has always been a shortcoming. Few schools and teachers teach students this knowledge for a long time. They usually wait until an accident occurs before starting a "sports war". In the education department, Carry out safety education at the same time under the requirements of the company. In the new "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students", safety education has been paid attention to. For example, the "Safety Protection" clause clearly stipulates that "stop at a red light and go at a green light, and avoid drowning and do not play with fire." Improving the safety knowledge content of primary and secondary school students is obviously more conducive to protecting the life, health and safety of primary and secondary school students.

These contents reflect the advancement with the times, and the contents of the core socialist values ??have been effectively reflected in the code. It has a lot of leading and deepening effects on improving students' civic awareness and practicing the core values ??of socialism from an early age.

3. Allow students to start from the things around them

The reporter found that in the new version of the code, empty words have been removed, the content is more straightforward, and it has been changed from the beginning to tail. The reporter saw that the first article of the old version, "Love the motherland, love the people, love the Communist Party of China," was changed to "Love the motherland. Respect the flag and national emblem, stand in awe while playing and singing the national anthem, raise and lower the flag in salute, and understand the national conditions and history." From From abstract description to concrete operation.

The old version of the code requires students to "study hard, think hard and ask questions, and have the courage to practice." The new version requires students to "listen attentively in class, have the courage to express opinions, complete homework on time, and develop reading habits." It is more straightforward. Students can see at a glance what they can do to love the motherland.

4. The code highlights the "three characteristics", namely normativeness, simplicity and pertinence.

Highlight normativeness.

The code is a basic requirement for the words and deeds of all students. It is a code of conduct that embodies the basic moral bottom line and requires all students to comply.

Highlight simplicity. The code strives to be brief and easy for students to remember and implement. Articles that are too vague or too demanding will be revised.

Highlight the pertinence. The code will strive to start from the characteristics of students in the new era, be close to students' reality, and pay attention to students' life safety, study and life, social and national responsibilities, and care for the environment.

5. You can also talk about the reasons why it does not need to be changed

A code is a standard that regulates people's behavior. The "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" is an overall requirement for primary and secondary school students. It represents a general direction and a macro grasp and definition of the development goals of primary and secondary school students. It is general, programmatic, principled and relative stability. Therefore, the code should not be too detailed or specific. For example, in the code, "love the motherland, love the people", "abide by school rules and disciplines, and abide by social ethics", "self-respect and self-love, self-confidence

self-improvement, civilized and healthy living habits", "love nature and care for nature" "Environment", etc., are the overall qualities that primary and secondary school students need to possess and the guidelines to be followed, which reflect the country's expectations and requirements for the new generation of talents.

Although these contents are abstract, grand and profound, they are flexible. It can be said that this is not only applicable to primary and secondary school, but also can be used as a guideline that a person needs to follow throughout his life.

Another important factor that has criticized the Code is its poor operability. In fact, in addition to the code, relevant departments have also formulated the "Daily Behavior Standards for Primary School Students" and "Daily Behavior Standards for Middle School Students" based on the different psychological, physiological and age characteristics of students. Detailed requirements are made for daily behavior. Norms and codes together constitute a relatively complete system. The code provides guidance from a macro perspective, and the norms are clarified from a subtle point of view. For example,

The "Standards" stipulate that students should "arrive at school on time, not be late, not leave early, not be absent from class, and not skip classes." It requires students to "respect faculty and staff, salute or take the initiative to say hello when they meet, and answer questions from teachers. "You must stand up and give your opinions to the teacher sincerely" and so on, which are similar to the contents of the foreign codes "come to class on time or slightly early" and "call the teacher by his title or surname". These clauses are specific, subtle and highly operational, but we have ignored them intentionally or unintentionally. Therefore, as long as we push the shelved "norms" from the backstage to the front, we will no longer worry about the inoperability of the "code".

This comparison can be seen that foreign students' "codes" are actually equivalent to our country's "norms". Netizens’ complaints about the unprofessional nature of my country’s “code” are due to the fact that they only know one (code) but not the second (normative), but more importantly, they have no understanding of education, culture and culture. Understanding and entanglement of concepts. Take the United States and China as examples. China attaches great importance to the learning of "basic knowledge" and the practice of "basic skills", while the United States attaches great importance to the cultivation of students' "creativity"; China's education focuses on giving

A summary of the child is used to teach students until they have no problems. American education focuses on giving children an inspiration and teaching students until they can constantly ask new questions. Chinese education is based on "obedience" as the standard, and "discourse hegemony" fills the classroom. /p>

You have to raise your hands when speaking. The United States encourages free speech, and different opinions are praised, full of democracy, harmony and equality... Therefore, when we learn from foreign countries, we cannot simply clone their written terms, but should Think and learn from

its educational concepts and methods, and use the essence from the details and differences for my own use. This makes more sense than dwelling on the empty abstractions of codes.

Based on this, the author believes that the "Code" can not be changed, and the "Standards" need to be added or deleted.

Contents that are not conducive to creating an atmosphere of democracy and equality between teachers and students and restrict students' free development can be deleted, such as raising hands to ask questions; more importantly, the life and survival education and gratitude that we

have long lacked can be deleted Refined and supplemented content such as integrity education, rights and compulsory education, career choice and gender education, democracy and equality education, mental health and humanistic care education, etc., to make them advance with the times and be close to reality, so as to Cultivate students' abilities and improve their comprehensive quality, and truly play the leading role of "codes" and "norms".

Teacher Zhang said that for a group of growing children, the more detailed, simple and straightforward some regulations are, the better. It will be easier for children to understand and implement.

6. You can also make an advanced analysis of one of the changes, such as bottom line requirements, responsibility, advancing with the times, etc.

Example

The "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" should actually be revised a long time ago

The "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" has been criticized by experts and parents as not being very operable. 》Revision has been started and empty content will be deleted. Yesterday, Wang Dinghua, director of the Basic Education Department of the Ministry of Education, revealed the above news while inspecting the new teaching model at Beijing Jiuxianqiao No. 1 Middle School.

We say that student codes are to be implemented by students, that is, they must be turned into actual behavioral rules for students in school. Otherwise, the so-called code will lose its original value. and meaning.

In fact, the current "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" should have been revised long ago, because this code is indeed too empty and too principled, making it difficult for teachers and students to implement it in practical terms.

Because it is difficult to study and live on the actual campus

In fact, our country's "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" has become a decoration on the classroom wall from the beginning, but it is not No, it's just black and white words that are useless. For example, the first article, "Love the motherland, love the people, and love the Communist Party of China." This content is actually a very principled provision, but in actual implementation, it is difficult to judge students' opinions. Specific behavioral measures, such as how to express love for the motherland, how to express love for the people, and how to express love for the Communist Party of China, are difficult to specify. These contents have actually been put forward accordingly in our basic course objectives, and there is really no need to write them into the student regulations. For another example, Article 7

"Honor your parents, respect your teachers, and be polite to others" is also very large and inappropriate. The content should be changed to "Do your best at home at home, and don't forget to say hello to your parents when you go out." , learn to care about and considerate parents" is more clear and specific. It is better to change it to "Say hello to the teacher when you meet at school, shout a report when entering the teacher's office, and learn to use polite words such as please and thank you among classmates. "Be more clear and specific. "Care for the living environment" in Article 10 should be changed to "Close neatly, do not throw away paper scraps and packaging materials, and complete the task of cleaning teachers and area sanitation according to regulations" to be clear and specific.

Therefore, the key to revising the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" is to make the abstract and empty content concrete, because only by making it concrete can the majority of primary and middle school students know how to implement it and turn its content into One's own actual

behavior, in this way, the so-called code will have practical educational and binding significance. For example, the rules for elementary school students in the United States include the following provisions: "Arrive to class on time or slightly early", "When the teacher asks a question and does not designate a student to answer, everyone who knows the answer should raise their hands", "When you are absent, you must make up for the missed lessons. Ask the teacher or classmates for advice"... This kind of regulation that is easy to understand at a glance and is as clear as words, because it is highly maneuverable, becomes student behavior, so

It’s not difficult at all, because the rules for students to do it are detailed and very specific.

In comparison, my country's "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" lists questions such as "come to class on time or slightly early", "when the teacher asks a question and does not designate a student to answer, everyone who knows the answer should give it." "Hand", "You must make up the missed lessons

when you are absent.

The specific content of "asking teachers or classmates for advice" is abstractly expressed as "abide by school rules and disciplines", "study hard, think hard, ask questions, and be willing to explore". There is no full consideration of how to operate the specific instructions.

How students implement it in action is just an empty slogan. Therefore, it is difficult for such a code to have a positive practical significance in students' behavioral standards.

In short, students must be coded. To truly exert practical significance, our code makers must fully consider replacing abstract and empty principle expressions with specific content. We must make the code specifically regulate student behavior, because our code is a specific guideline that stipulates students' basic behaviors in school. Instead of flashy wall decorations

"Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" should be changed

Yuan Tiange "Youth Reference"

Students in China. Many of the codes include relatively abstract terms such as abiding by laws and regulations, loving science, and self-respect and self-respect. Although the codes of the United States and the United Kingdom do not have many items, many Chinese parents recognize them very much and consider them to be based on

Children’s perspective is more down-to-earth. In the past two days, Shen Shuhong, deputy director of the Nanjing Institute of Educational Sciences, has posted several posts on Weibo suggesting that the Ministry of Education should revise the “Code for Primary and Secondary School Students” (Modern Express, August 19). 》)

“No one is allowed to touch the areas covered by vests and underpants. "When you encounter danger, you can run away first." “Bad people can cheat. "Aren't the above clauses very unusual? In fact, this is the code for British primary school students that is currently circulating on the Internet. The codes for primary school students in the United States, Japan and other countries are not the same as those in the UK. , but compared with China's "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students", it is still more down-to-earth and more in line with children's psychological characteristics.

Looking back at our "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students", the first article is. "Love the motherland, love the people, love the Communist Party of China. The last one is "Love nature and care for the natural environment." "Other clauses are the same as these two.

They all have the same characteristics - high abstraction and idealization. Of course we can't say there is anything wrong with this, but it is too abstract. And idealistic things are obviously not suitable for primary and secondary school students, especially the psychological characteristics and receptive abilities of primary school students. It is difficult to truly reach the spiritual world of children, and it is difficult to truly play the role of regulation and guidance.

As the relevant education experts have called, the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" that has been in service for nearly ten years has come to be further improved and revised.

First of all, even if It is a "code" and should keep pace with the times and cannot remain unchanged. Looking at the 10 contents of the domestic "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students", although all of them are "politically correct", they lack the characteristics of the times. At a glance, it seems that

It applies to everyone, but upon closer inspection, we find that it is seriously out of touch with the daily lives and social environment of primary and secondary school students. To give a simple example, the national education department began to formulate the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" more than 10 years ago. At that time, there was no such thing as "Internet addiction", but now primary and secondary school students have become the main victims of "Internet addiction". In their rules, should they be polite and healthy when surfing the Internet? Guidance content?

Secondly, although national conditions and education systems are different, cultivating children’s awareness of self-protection and improving their basic moral qualities from an early age should be the same and similar across the world. . When we formulate or revise

the domestic Code for Primary and Secondary School Students, why not make some useful reference and learning? The current Code for Primary and Secondary School Students in China gives the impression that it focuses too much on the big picture. Too much emphasis is placed on cultivating "future" talents, but they often neglect to allow children to start from now and start with details. The codes for primary school students in the UK, the United States, Japan and other countries advocate that students must do what they must in reality. Starting from small things that can be achieved and achieved not only reflects the educator's pragmatic style, but also cultivates the down-to-earth quality of the next generation.

"Code for Primary and Secondary School Students." ", as the guiding normative requirements for primary and secondary school students across the country, it should not only keep pace with the times, but also be grounded, and should also be in line with the psychological characteristics of primary and secondary school students.

Therefore, the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" has been promulgated and implemented for nearly 10 years, and it is time to change it.

The code for primary and secondary school students should really be changed

Zhang Hang

Shen Shuhong, deputy director of the Nanjing Institute of Educational Sciences, posted multiple Weibo posts calling for the revision of the code The news about the Code of Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Students suddenly made us realize that the once-familiar Code of Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Students is indeed pale and jerky.

The British "Code for Primary School Students" has 10 articles, which are translated into Chinese and is more than 100 words; the American "Code for Primary School Students" has 12 articles and is more than 200 words. The British "Code?" mainly emphasizes self-protection: no one is allowed to touch the areas covered by vests and underpants. If you encounter danger, you can break the glass, destroy furniture, etc. The American "Code for Elementary School Students" revolves around It is mainly the basic qualities that primary school students should have in school, including addressing teachers by their title or surname, arriving to class on time

or a little early, raising hands when asking questions, etc.

Comparatively. , "Study hard" and "Self-respect and self-love" in my country's "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" are obviously too empty. Randomly interviewing 10 students below the third grade of primary school, no one can really explain what "self-esteem and self-love" is.

Not many students will take it seriously, and most teachers will not implement it seriously. At most, they will read it to the new students on the first day of school (more schools will read out school rules and regulations instead of announcing the code) , the fact is that observing the code has become almost useless, and it is a pity to abandon it.

Compared with foreign countries, our "code" and "code of conduct" are too comprehensive. , pursuing the so-called "high aspirations", but in fact, for teenagers, teaching children how to protect themselves and how to help others is more important than anything else.

The temptations and dangers that Chinese children face when growing up. They are much older than in the past, and we need to give them more care and protection. "Code" and "code of conduct" are actually good means of protection. They need to tell children in a popular and straightforward way. What is right and what is wrong, using the experience of adults to help them, and at the same time cooperating with the knowledge transfer in the classroom, is the true education model for the comprehensive development of morality, intelligence and physical fitness.

The code for domestic primary school students. (1994 edition)

1. Love the motherland, love the people, and love the Communist Party of China.

2. Abide by laws and regulations, enhance legal awareness, and abide by school rules and disciplines. Social ethics.

3. Love science, study hard, be diligent in asking questions, be willing to explore, and actively participate in social practice and useful activities.

4. Cherish life, pay attention to safety, Exercise. Pay attention to hygiene.

5. Self-esteem, self-confidence, and civilized and healthy living habits.

6. Actively participate in work, be diligent and simple, and do what you can do.

7. Honor your parents, respect your teachers, and be polite to others.

8. Love the collective, unite your classmates, and care for others.

9. Be honest and trustworthy. , be consistent in words and deeds, correct mistakes when they are recognized, and be responsible

10. Love nature and care for the living environment

British primary school students' code

1. Safety. Growth is more important than success.

2. Don’t allow others to touch the areas covered by your vest and pants.

3. Life comes first, property comes second.

4. .A little secret to tell mom.

5. Don’t drink drinks from strangers and don’t eat candy from strangers.

6. Don’t talk to strangers.

7. When in danger, you can break the glass and destroy the furniture.

8. If you encounter danger, you can run away first.

9. Don’t keep bad guys’ secrets.

10. Bad people can cheat.

Rules for American Elementary School Students

1. Call the teacher by his or her title or surname.

2. Arrive to class on time or slightly early.

3. Raise your hand when asking questions.

4. You can talk to the teacher at your seat.

5. When you are absent, you must make up for the missed lessons and ask the teacher or classmates for advice.

6. If you leave school due to an emergency, tell your teacher in advance and ask for relevant information about the delay in homework.

7. All homework must be completed by yourself.

8. Cheating is not allowed in exams.

9. If you have difficulty listening to the class, you can make an appointment with the teacher for help. The teacher will be happy to help you.

10. Any absence or tardiness requires a parent’s leave request form.

Japanese elementary school students’ rules

1. Don’t be late; don’t go out casually after entering school.

2. When you hear the assembly signal, quickly line up at the designated place; when entering the classroom, open doors and windows lightly; keep quiet in corridors and stairs, and keep to the right.

3. Sit down as soon as the bell rings and wait for the teacher to come. Keep your posture correct during class, do not gossip, and study diligently.

4. If you are late, leave early, or fail to show up for some reason, you must explain the reasons to the teacher and ask for leave in advance.

5. Strictly abide by the prescribed dismissal time. Any extension of stay in school must be approved by the teacher.

6. Take the prescribed route when going to and from school, keep to the right, and do not take detours or buy snacks.

7. Don’t panic when encountering emergencies such as earthquakes and fires, and act quickly according to the teacher’s instructions.

Tao Zhiyuan: Does the "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" have to be changed?

Previously, some people compared China’s codes for primary and secondary school students with those of the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia and other countries, criticizing China’s codes as being unreasonable, vague and abstract, and lacking in operability. Once this news was disclosed, it aroused the enthusiastic attention of the majority of netizens, and public opinion showed a one-sided trend. Does my country’s “Code for Primary and Secondary School Students” have to be changed? The author feels that this is a misunderstanding of the Code.

A code is a standard that regulates people's behavior.

The "Code for Primary and Secondary School Students" is an overall requirement for primary and secondary school students. It represents a general direction and is a macro grasp and definition of the development goals of primary and secondary school students. It is general, programmatic, principled and relative stability. Therefore,

the code should not be made too detailed or specific. For example, in the code, "love the motherland, love the people", "abide by school rules and disciplines, and abide by social ethics", "self-esteem and self-love, self-confidence and self-improvement, and have civilized and healthy living habits", "passionately love nature and care for "Natural environment", etc., are the overall qualities that primary and secondary school students need to possess and the guidelines to be followed, which reflect the country's expectations and requirements for the new generation of talents. Although these contents are abstract and grand and seem high

deep, they are flexible. It can be said that this is not only applicable to primary and secondary school, but also can be used as a guideline that a person needs to follow throughout his life.

Another important factor that has been criticized is that

its poor operability. In fact, in addition to the code, relevant departments have also formulated the "Daily Behavior Standards for Primary School Students" and "Daily Behavior Standards for Middle School Students" based on the different psychological, physiological and age characteristics of students. Detailed requirements are made for daily behavior. Norms and codes together constitute a relatively complete system. The code provides guidance from a macro perspective, and the norms are clarified from a subtle point of view. For example, the "Standards" stipulate that students should "arrive at school on time, not be late, not leave early, not be absent from class, and not skip classes" and require students to "respect faculty and staff, salute or take the initiative to say hello when they meet, and answer teachers' questions You must stand up, and you must be sincere when giving advice to the teacher,” etc., which are similar to the contents of foreign codes such as “come to class on time or slightly early” and “call the teacher’s title or surname.” These clauses are specific, subtle and highly operational, but we have ignored them intentionally or unintentionally. Therefore, as long as we push the shelved "norms" from the backstage to the front, we will no longer worry about the inoperability of the "code".

This comparison can be seen that foreign students' "codes" are actually equivalent to our country's "norms".

Netizens’ complaints about the unprofessional nature of my country’s “code” are due to the fact that they only know one (code) but not the second (normative), but more importantly, they have no understanding of education, culture and culture. Understanding and entanglement of concepts. Take the United States and China as examples. China attaches great importance to the learning of "basic knowledge" and the practice of "basic skills", while the United States attaches great importance to the cultivation of students' "creativity"; China's education focuses on giving

A summary of the child is used to teach students until they have no problems. American education focuses on giving children an inspiration and teaching students until they can constantly ask new questions. Chinese education is based on "obedience" as the standard, and "discourse hegemony" fills the classroom. /p>

You have to raise your hands when speaking. The United States encourages free speech, and different opinions are praised, full of democracy, harmony and equality... Therefore, when we learn from foreign countries, we cannot simply clone their written terms, but should Think and learn from

its educational concepts and methods, and use the essence from the details and differences for my own use. This makes more sense than dwelling on the empty abstractions of codes.

Based on this, the author believes that the "Code" can not be changed, and the "Standards" need to be added or deleted. Contents that are not conducive to creating an atmosphere of democracy and equality between teachers and students and restrict students' free development can be deleted, such as raising hands to ask questions; more importantly, the life and survival education, gratitude and education that we have long lacked can be deleted. Contents such as integrity education, rights and compulsory education, career choice and gender education, democracy and equality education, mental health and humanistic care education will be refined and supplemented to keep pace with the times and be close to reality, so as to cultivate Students' abilities and comprehensive qualities should be improved to truly play the leading role of "codes" and "norms".