Civil Service Examination Data Analysis Questions

In early November 2007, the National Bureau of Statistics organized the seventh national sample survey on people’s sense of security. Regarding the current social security environment, 20.8% of the people surveyed thought it was “very safe”, 42.8% thought it was “safe”, 29.7% thought it was “basically safe” and 5.2% thought it was “not very safe”. %, "unsafe" accounted for 1.5%, of which the total proportion of "very safe", "safe" and "basically safe" accounted for 93.3%, an increase of 1.3 percentage points compared with 2006. The public’s perception of public safety has steadily increased.

Among the issues affecting people’s safety perception, 24.8% of the respondents chose “criminal crimes”, 27.6% chose “public order and disorder”, and 27.6% chose “traffic accidents”. 38.2%, 9.4% chose “fire”. Compared with 2006, the number of people who chose "criminal crime" dropped by 1.2 percentage points, the number of people who chose "public order and disorder" dropped by 4.2 percentage points, the people who chose "traffic accidents" increased by 5.0 percentage points, and the people who chose "fire" increased by 5.0 percentage points. increased by 0.4 percentage points.

Compared with last year, 24.0% of the respondents believed that the local public security situation had "significantly improved", and 48.0% believed that the local security situation had "become better". 24.8% believed that the local security situation was "the same as before", and 24.8% believed that the local security situation was "significantly improved". 2.7% said it was "worse than before" and 0.5% said it was "much worse than before". The total proportion of people who chose "There is a significant improvement", "There is improvement" and "The same as before" was 96.8%, an increase of 1.7 percentage points compared with 2006.

Regarding the security and order situation in some special places, 55.0% of the respondents believed that the security and order situation "around the school" was "good", an increase of 7.8 percentage points from 2006; those who thought it was "average" Accounting for 35.2%, a decrease of 4.4 percentage points; those who think it is "poor" account for 3.7%, a decrease of 1.3 percentage points; those who "don't understand" account for 6.1%, a decrease of 2.1 percentage points.

32.6% of the respondents believed that the public security order situation in "public places" was "good", an increase of 7.0 percentage points from 200d; 38.9% believed that the public security order situation was "average", a decrease of 0.1%. percentage points; 6.0% thought it was “poor”, a decrease of 1.7 percentage points; 22.5% believed it was “poor”, a decrease of 5.2 percentage points.

Regarding the intensity of crackdown on illegal and criminal activities, 58.1% of the respondents believed that the crackdown was “effective”, an increase of 9.9 percentage points from 2006; 36.7% believed that the crackdown was “not very effective”, a decrease of 36.7%. increased by 7.3 percentage points; 5.2% believed that it was “inadequate”, a decrease of 2.6 percentage points.

Regarding the deployment status of security booths (or guard rooms) and security patrol teams, 42.4% of the respondents had “security booths (police stations) or guard rooms” near their residences, an increase from 2006 The number increased by 8.2 percentage points, 57.6% did not have one; 59.9% had a "security patrol team", an increase of 4.7 percentage points from 2006, and 40.1% did not have one.

1. In 2006, choosing "criminal crime" was lower than choosing "public disorder" by () percentage points.

A.3.8 B.5.8 C.4.2 D.1.2

2. The proportion of people who thought the social security environment was “very safe”, “safe” and “basically safe” in 2006 It is () percentage points more than the proportion who think that the public security and order situation "around the school" is "good" or "average".

A.6.9 B.2.8 C.5.2 D.4

3. In 2006, there were more “security booths (police stations) or guard rooms” than there were “security patrol teams” less()%.

A.20 B.17.5 C.14 D.18

Analysis

1.B. It can be seen that in 2006, 24.8% + 1.2% = 26% chose "criminal crime", and 27.6% + 4.2% = 31.8% chose "public disorder", which is 31.8-26 = 5.8 percentage points lower.

2.C.

In 2006, the proportion of those who believed that the social security environment was "very safe", "safe" and "basically safe" was 93.3% - 1.3% = 92%; in 2006, those who believed that the security and order situation "around the school" was "good" and "average" Accounting for 55.0%-7.8%+35.2%+4.4%=86.8%. 92-86.8=5.2 percentage points.

3.D. In 2006, 42.4% had “security booths (police stations) or guard rooms” ÷ (1 + 8.2%) = 39.2%, and 59.9% had “security patrol teams” ÷ (1 + 4.7%) = 57.2%, with less 57.2%-39.2%=18%.

How do you understand the analysis of the third question? My own calculation was 21%, which is incorrect.