Curious! What findings will the United Nations have on the "chemical weapons incident in Syria"?

1. The use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government has always been considered by most democratic countries in the world.

Before referring to this report, the UN Secretary-General condemned Assad for committing crimes against humanity. The United Nations, including both sides of the war, considered this a war crime, only adding another crime against humanity to Assad. In other words, some information provided by the United Nations report, although the report itself does not specify the culprit, can still give the greatest suspicion from the evidence.

This time, the chemical weapons attack attacked the area controlled by the opposition, and the weapon was a ground-to-ground rocket (that is, a large weapon platform installed on a vehicle, which is also an equipment of the Syrian government). The opposition does not have such a weapon system. Judging from the information and videos of all parties, the opposition equipment does not have any heavy weapon platform at all).

3. Chemical weapons are strictly prohibited internationally, and the world powers are absolutely not allowed to trade them, because if they are traded, they will inevitably lead to proliferation and flow to various militants, even those who are hostile to big countries, which will harm the interests of big countries. Therefore, Syria's chemical weapons can only come from Syria's own chemical arsenal.

Second, the Syrian government has the motive to use chemical weapons.

1, regardless of the motive, the Syrian government is most suspected of using chemical weapons. As we know, the Syrian civil war originated from a large number of people taking to the streets to oppose Assad's hereditary rule. Assad brutally suppressed the people's demands for peace, which led to a popular uprising and turned into a civil war.

2. From the history of ancient and modern China and foreign countries, it can be seen that when the rule of the only ruler is threatened, it is absolutely unscrupulous and bloody. In other words, the more you confront your own strength at home, the bloodier it is.

3. The civil war in Syria is now going on. It can be said that Assad has lost half the country. Whether the war can last depends mainly on the supply of materials. In the final analysis, he must have money. A government's income mainly depends on taxes and state-owned holding enterprises. At present, Assad has lost half of his country, so it is definitely not enough to rely on taxes alone. Foreign trade has almost been interrupted by international sanctions, so it can be said that he is completely living on his laurels. Although Russia is aiding Syria, it is not free.

4. The opposition can get free aid from many countries, and it is recognized by most countries, including moral support or assistance from more than 60 countries, most of which are more developed and advanced in the world.

Therefore, the Assad family ruled for more than 30 years, and suddenly the whole regime faced total loss, losing half of the country, which can be said to be internal and external troubles. Moreover, because it is short of hands, it can be said that it is heavily in blood debt, and once it fails, it will be executed. The United States is caught in two wars, the economic recovery is weak, and the anti-war trend of people in western countries is rising. Russia restricts the West for geopolitical interests and decides to put all its eggs in one basket and deter the opposition forces with chemical weapons.

Third, it is a responsible act for the national society headed by the United States to intervene in the Syrian crisis and disarm Syrian chemical weapons.

The international community stood idly by and remained indifferent to the initial civil war in Syria, which led to the deterioration of the situation. It is inevitable that the death toll will be 654.38+10,200,000. In addition, the chemical arsenal is out of control, and if it is left unchecked, there will be a danger of chemical weapons proliferation.

It's like several people are fighting, and everyone is watching, regardless of the police. In the end, the fighting became more and more fierce, and finally, a knife and a gun were used, and even a bomb was used, so everyone would be hurt. Therefore, the intervention of the international community in a war-torn area is actually the behavior of the person in charge.

Chemical weapons may spread to some extremists and stay in other hot spots in the world to launch attacks. Just like a Mars, if you don't pay attention to it, it will slowly turn into a fire. In addition, although the civil war is still going on, the influence of moderate opposition will gradually weaken, because after all, their combat capability is relatively poor, and a few extremists will gradually grow because of their bravery in combat. By then, Syria may become a hotbed of terrorist forces.

The chief culprit of the Syrian issue is Bashar. Bashar is a hereditary rule with serious corruption. There are many domestic opposition forces, and the domestic situation is getting worse. In this case, Bashar has actually lost its legitimacy, because nearly half of the domestic forces are against you. How can you represent this country? Therefore, as Bashar famously said, he should put the interests of the country and the nation first, give up his rights and re-elect a leader acceptable to all parties in the country. However, Bashar was obsessed with power, refused to step down and brutally suppressed the peaceful people, which led to the intensification of domestic contradictions and gradually evolved into a civil war.

At present, the civil war is in a stalemate, which shows that some forces still support Bashar (because they are worried that the opposition can't guarantee their own interests or liquidate their own interests, so they can only support Bashar), but another part of the majority (opposition) resolutely opposes Bashar. Because Bashar has blood debts, the opposition will never accept Bashar again.

Therefore, the stumbling block to stable peace in Syria is Bashar. If the forces currently supporting the government forces can re-elect a new representative to negotiate with the opposition on their behalf, it is entirely possible for the two sides to reach a compromise and achieve national peace. The premise is that Bashar is no longer qualified to participate and speak on behalf of the interests of any faction because of his bloody suppression of the people's demands for peace, and he must give up his political power.