The Supreme People's Court issued a statement to "resolutely prevent the practice of "harmony" such as who is justified in making trouble, who is justified in bullying, and who is justified in being i

The Supreme People's Court issued a statement to "resolutely prevent the practice of "harmony" such as who is justified in making trouble, who is justified in bullying, and who is justified in being injured." What information is worth paying attention to?

On August 2, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference, proposing that the People's Court should be centered in the judgment, be impartial, distinguish right from wrong, settle disputes with determination, effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and give the parties a " "Explanation" to give an explanation of social fairness and justice. We must resolutely prevent "harmony" practices such as those who make trouble are justified, those who are arrogant are justified, and those who are injured are justified. Let the judiciary have strength, right and wrong, and warmth, return the judiciary to its origins, and safeguard fairness and justice. Some netizens added, saying that this is incomplete, and there are other situations such as who is right who is a foreigner, who is right who is poor, who is right who is older, who is right who is underage, who is right who is weak, who is right who has a loud voice, etc. should be included.

The Supreme People’s Court has made such a statement, which shows that the court system can no longer tolerate the current chaos in grassroots law enforcement. This is of course a good thing. "Be reasonable and don't speak loudly." In reality, when encountering disputes, some people will act like rogues by bumping into each other, falling down, rolling around, etc., and take the opportunity to extort money; in the online world, there are also people who, in order to achieve their own goals, Malicious cutting and splicing, in an attempt to confuse right and wrong, can easily deceive people who don't know the truth.

Some relevant departments also have the problem of "distribution according to trouble" when handling disputes. Some law enforcement officers always want to "keep things quiet" when encountering problems, and habitually "play fifty big shots each". Although this kind of operation is simple and easy, it often obscures fairness and justice.

What does it say?

The Supreme Court’s statement now shows that this matter has attracted attention. Attention is a prerequisite for making changes. We hope that in judicial practice, more people can feel fairness and justice. The law is very professional, and many people really cannot understand the provisions, but everyone can definitely see whether a judgment is in line with the will of the people.

We are also looking forward to seeing those who use their power to commit crimes pay the price, not because they are troublesome, they are weak, they are poor, they are old, and other gender advantages, or other advantages are inexplicably lost. preferential treatment. For example, an online ride-hailing driver was stabbed in the neck with a knife and received a gift of 1,500 yuan. Another example is a high-speed rail beating that was classified as a physical assault. Another example is a boy who stopped bullying at a political and legal university in Beijing and was reconciled. Every time there is such a dispute, it is the whole society's respect for the law and credibility that ultimately pays the bill. Don't feel that it has nothing to do with us. Each of us is a potential victim.

What’s the point?

In the past, someone asked whether fighting back when one is about to be killed is legitimate defense. In other cases, it is either excessive defense or intentional injury. In fact, before the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the Supreme People's Court issued guidance on legitimate defense, prior defense, subsequent defense, excessive defense, and even intentional harm were all possible, but it was difficult to authenticate true defense.

But now, after the guidance is issued, the relevant provisions of who dies and who is justified are eliminated, and whoever makes trouble is justified. It resolutely defends the rule of law spirit that the law cannot bow to the law. For illegal restrictions on personal freedom, illegal Behaviors such as intruding into other people's homes, pulling steering wheels, beating drivers, and school bullying can all be carried out as self-defense, and the timing of self-defense is no longer so harsh. Everyone’s suggestion here is to avoid it if you can in the early stage. If the other party still bites the nose and faces, then we must implement the core of "If someone doesn’t offend me, I will not offend him. If someone offends me, I will offend him." Thought.

No matter what, this is an improvement in judicial fairness, truly clarifying responsibilities and protecting the interests of all parties. The public has a simple sense of justice that "evil prevails over good". If these unreasonable and messy behaviors are allowed to gain the upper hand, it will not only destroy the moral order, but also trample on the majesty of the law. Only by correcting "whoever makes trouble is justified" and "whoever is killed or injured is justified" can we protect the real victims and embody the strict spirit of rule of law that "the law cannot give in to the law".