I want to participate in the debate. The argument is that cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition. Argument materials are needed, and those who have the materials will get poi

I want to participate in the debate. The argument is that cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition. Argument materials are needed, and those who have the materials will get points!

Citing the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, the pace of progress of human civilization was the fastest in history!

Our Chinese textbooks say that "modern society is a society full of competition, but At the same time, it is also a society that requires more cooperation. As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success. "Competition and cooperation are the two forces that constitute life and social survival and development. Competition in social life is more important. There is cooperation.

"The Three Stooges are better than Zhuge Liang." The more people there are, the more wisdom they have. As long as they are good at cooperating and exerting the power of cooperation and unity, they can come up with solutions and achieve success. Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird. There is a popular saying in Japan: One Chinese can defeat one Japanese, but three Chinese cannot defeat three Japanese. Although this statement means that Chinese people have the ability to compete and succeed individually, but they are not good at collective collaboration. Take the national men's volleyball team, men's basketball team, and men's football team as an example: in terms of height, we are much taller than the Japanese and Korean players; in terms of training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key games? One of the important reasons is that they have exerted a spirit of cooperation, at least they cooperate better than us. It can be seen that no matter what they do, people who are good at cooperation can achieve success with the joint efforts of both parties.

However, there are many problems in competition, which can easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and make people become more selfish and narrow-minded. It also makes many people feel great pressure, feel at a loss what to do, and even suffer from serious psychological disorders. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. Thanks!

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the students who argued the case. Next, I would like to ask the students who argued the case to state their position and please speak.

Anti-side 1 would like to say to everyone: Dear debate friends, hello everyone!

Modern society is constantly progressing due to competition! Even more energetic because of competition! We believe that competition in modern society can advance civilization more than cooperation. The pursuit of development competition can turn the backward into the advanced. Society follows this eternal law of competition to move toward modernity and the future. For individuals, the premise of competition is that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the competition, and the result must be the survival of the fittest, which ensures social fairness; the process of competition is for everyone to do their best, which in turn encourages individuals to exert their enthusiasm. In this era that calls for the strong, competition is not only a requirement of the times, but also a challenge to human nature. Let us face this era of competition directly!

Friends from the other side, aren’t you here just to compete with us? If we follow your logic, wouldn’t it make sense for us to debate here today? Today's debate is a competition to win or lose and promote progress.

Which one, cooperation or competition, can better promote the progress of civilization?

The host said: Now I will introduce the first argument of the affirmative: Wu Ying; the second argument of the affirmative: Shen Tao; the third argument: Wang Qian; Proposition 4 defense: Ding Li; Negative side 1 defense: Zhu Xiaoman; Negative side 2 defense: Jiang Yuekai; Negative side 3 defense: Wang Lina; Negative side 4 defense: Zhang Xiyi.

Today our affirmative argument is: Cooperation can make civilization progress better than competition. The opponent's argument is: competition can make civilization progress more than cooperation.

The host said to everyone: Now the debate begins. First, the affirmative and first debate students will state their own views.

Opening argument stage:

The 1st debater of the affirmative said to everyone: Dear judges, guests, and fellow debaters of the other party, hello everyone!

Our Chinese textbook says, "Modern society is a society full of competition, but it is also a society that requires more cooperation. As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success." Competition and cooperation are two forces that constitute life and social survival and development. There is competition in social life, but there is also cooperation.

"The Three Stooges are better than Zhuge Liang." The more people there are, the more wisdom they have. As long as they are good at cooperating and exerting the power of cooperation and unity, they can come up with solutions and achieve success. Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird.

There is a popular saying in Japan: One Chinese can defeat one Japanese, but three Chinese cannot defeat three Japanese. Although this statement means that Chinese people have the ability to compete and succeed individually, but they are not good at collective collaboration. Take the national men's volleyball team, men's basketball team, and men's football team as an example: in terms of height, we are much taller than the Japanese and Korean players; in terms of training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key games? One of the important reasons is that they have shown a spirit of cooperation, at least better than us. It can be seen that no matter what they do, people who are good at cooperation can achieve success with the joint efforts of both parties.

However, there are many problems in competition, which can easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and make people become more selfish and narrow-minded. It also makes many people feel great pressure, feel at a loss what to do, and even suffer from serious psychological disorders. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. Thanks!

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the students who argued the case. Next, I would like to ask the students who argued the case to state their position and please speak.

Anti-side 1 would like to say to everyone: Dear debate friends, hello everyone!

Modern society is constantly progressing due to competition! Even more energetic because of competition! We believe that competition in modern society can advance civilization more than cooperation. The pursuit of development competition can turn the backward into the advanced. Society follows this eternal law of competition to move toward modernity and the future. For individuals, the premise of competition is that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the competition, and the result must be the survival of the fittest, which ensures social fairness; the process of competition is for everyone to do their best, which in turn encourages individuals to exert their enthusiasm. In this era that calls for the strong, competition is not only a requirement of the times, but also a challenge to human nature. Let us face this era of competition directly!

My fellow debaters, aren’t you here just to compete with us? If we follow your logic, wouldn’t it make sense for us to debate here today? Today's debate is a competition to win or lose and promote progress. Thank you

The host said to everyone: Thank you, classmate Yibian from the opposite side. The speech phase of the competition is over.

Record 2 of the Debate on Which of Cooperation and Competition Can Make Civilization Progress

2. Attack and Defense Stage:

The host said to everyone: The next step is to enter the second stage. The second stage is the attack and defense stage. Let’s first ask the affirmative and second debaters to add their own points of view.

The affirmative side 2 would like to say to everyone: Judges, opponents and friends: Hello everyone!

Mr. Sun Yat-sen said: "Species are based on competition as their principle, and humans are based on cooperation. If humans follow this principle, they will prosper, and if they do not follow this principle, they will perish." It can be seen how important cooperation is.

There is a popular saying in the north and south of the Yangtze River: everyone rows to sail a big boat. Everyone will never forget the devastating flood in 1998! Facts have proved that the victory of this special battle requires the joint efforts of all flood-fighting officers and soldiers and people of all ethnic groups across the country, in order to finally build an unbreakable flood-fighting Great Wall on the backbone of our nation.

We will never forget that when SARS was raging in 2003, it was with the joint efforts of leaders at all levels from the central to local levels and people from all walks of life that we united and achieved the final victory. victory. Therefore, all of this proves that "cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition."

Due to competition, the relationship is indifferent. You are on guard against me, and I am on guard against you. It is common to appear harmonious on the surface but compete with each other in your heart. Fellow debater on the other side, isn’t this all caused by “competition”?

The host said to everyone: Thank you, the second debate student of the affirmative side. Next, let’s listen to the rebuttal from the second debate students on the opposing side.

Anti-party 2 says to everyone: Hello everyone!

The other party's first debate was fluent, and the other party's second debate was eloquent. However, neither the microwave nor the angry waves could wash away the questions of the other debater's friends. The opponent's first argument pointed out that competition will make human beings become more selfish and narrow-minded. The various harmful effects listed by the opponent's second argument are not caused by competition, but by his own unhealthy psychology.

Our ancestors have long told us that only through competition can civilization and progress be achieved. Competition is conducive to the creation, discovery and selection of talents in society. As Lenin said: "Competition cultivates enterprising spirit, perseverance and bold initiative on a very broad scale." Competition is the mother of social progress.

Let us enter a competitive society and be strong. Finally, I would like to ask my fellow debaters, if you are so opposed to competition, does it mean that you are actually afraid of competition?

The host said to everyone: Thank you to the second debate student from the negative side. Next, we will invite the third debate student from the affirmative side to speak.

The affirmative side 3 would like to say to everyone: Hello, Chairman, fellow judges and fellow debaters from the other side!

The first argument of the opposition mentioned: Today’s debate is a kind of competition, and the second argument of the opposition also mentioned: Competition causes unhealthy psychology. The opposing debater's view that competition is the apple of his eye and a panacea is completely wrong. Could it be said that only competition can promote the development of social civilization? Let me ask you, "Things that have nothing to do with oneself are ignored", "I only know how to take, but I am unwilling to contribute"; I only emphasize personal competition and do not care about the development and future of the country. Where does the development of civilization come from? Therefore, you It is nonsense to say that competition is conducive to the development of civilization.

During the Three Kingdoms period, Sun Quan and Liu Bei united to fight against Cao Cao, establishing the situation of the Three Kingdoms; the birth of "Das Kapital" was no longer the same. Is it also the result of the cooperation between Marx and Engels?

Everyone knows Michael Jordan of the Chicago Bulls, and many people may be crazy about him. Jordan's success cannot be separated from the cooperation and assistance of his teammates. . Looking back on the past and looking towards the future, we firmly believe that "cooperation can make civilization progress"!

The host said: The content is wonderful and the expressions are also very good. Next. Let’s listen to the counter-argument of the three opponents.

Hello, fellow judges and debate friends! Now I will present my defense statement.

The society requires that people use their talents according to their abilities and compete for jobs. Competition is more conducive to a legalized society than cooperation, ensuring the orderly conduct of competition. For example: You can't cooperate with the classmates next to you in the college entrance examination, right? In sports competitions, you have to rely on competition. Competing for the championship, right? In the talent selection process, if there is no competition, it will only be "a sad thing". If there is competition, it will be "reducing talents regardless of the style"! Talents can be selected through competition. Can we select through cooperation? Selection?

Please answer the questions from me and the second debater directly. Please do not avoid the questions.

The host said to everyone: Thank you for the third debater.

Record 3 of the Debate on Which of Cooperation and Competition Can Make Civilization Progress

3. Free Debate Stage:

The host said to everyone: I have heard representatives from both sides talk about "competition and cooperation" ” speech, now is the time for them to show off their eloquence. The positive side must speak first. Now the free debate begins!

The positive side 4 said to everyone: ( ) Behind every achievement and honor, Isn’t this the result of everyone’s cooperation?

The opposition’s 4th defense said to everyone: In the statement just now, the other party’s 3rd defense mentioned the cooperation between Liu Bei and Sun Quan to fight against Cao Cao. The purpose is to enhance strength and compete better. Doesn’t this just show that competition is more important than cooperation?

The opponent 1 said to everyone: I would like to ask the opponent’s friends, the United States, Britain and other countries cooperated to attack Iraq? , can it also make civilization progress?

The opponent’s 4th debate said to everyone: The opponent’s first debate mentioned that our football team cannot win against Japan and South Korea. The reason is not because we lack a sense of cooperation, but because we lack a sense of competition. Even if we have high technology, no sense of competition, and no desire to win, we will not be able to win no matter what.

The affirmative side 2 said to everyone: This shows that cooperation is the basis of competition, and competition is just a means at best. Doesn’t this also show that cooperation is more important than competition?

Anti-party 2: The competition is about winning or losing. Isn’t winning and losing also competition? Why do you want to compete here? Isn’t it also for competition?

The affirmative side 1 would like to say to everyone: Isn’t the competition between both parties conducted on the basis of cooperation? Without such good cooperation, would it be possible to achieve such good results? This just shows that "cooperation can better promote the progress of civilization"!

The 3rd argument of the affirmative says to everyone: In order to compete, some companies will eventually become unprofitable or even go bankrupt. Isn’t this caused by competition?

The affirmative side 1 said to everyone: Many famous musicians at home and abroad can dominate the stage. Behind their success, there are not many people working together and working together. ?

The first defense of the affirmative said to everyone: A professor of psychology at Harvard University in the United States, he listed "sincere cooperation with colleagues" as one of the nine elements of success, and "unsociable words and deeds, not good at cooperating with others" ” is listed as the first of the nine factors of failure.

The fourth argument for the affirmative tells everyone: The first argument for the negative is that most families in China now have only children. These "little emperors" and "little princesses" especially lack the sense of cooperation. In such a society, Under the conditions, if we no longer cultivate the spirit of cooperation, but focus on cultivating the spirit of competition, what will happen to our society?

The affirmative 4th debate said to everyone: United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said: "No matter what career you choose in the future, you must learn to cooperate with others." This is the summary of the Secretary-General's 40 years of diplomatic experience.

Anti-party 3 said to everyone: A sense of competition is an indispensable condition for the growth of talents. Competition for further education and business competition are very fierce. Then, the selection of cadres in studies is also competition. Is it possible to swim against the current? Isn't it a competition?

Anti-party 4 debaters say to everyone: Modern society requires the use of talents according to their ability and competition for employment. I would like to ask my fellow debaters on the other side, whether competition is more important than cooperation? You can't work together, right?

The affirmative side 2 said to everyone: There is such a fable: the monkey and the elephant both want to eat the fruit from the tree on the other side. Monkeys cannot cross rivers and elephants cannot climb trees. After the two parties negotiated, the elephants carried the monkeys across the river, and the monkeys climbed up the trees to pick fruits. They all ate the fruits. This is the benefit achieved by learning from each other's strengths and complementing each other's weaknesses and working closely together.

Anti-party 2 said to everyone: If we continue to cooperate and have no spirit of innovation, mankind will only stop moving forward. If competition is not that important, then what are we still arguing here today?

The third argument for the affirmative said to everyone: The first argument for the negative side said: Competition stimulates people's enthusiasm, but it depends on one person's strength alone. Can strength achieve your goals?

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: Can the evil forces in society cooperate with each other, act tyrannically, and commit all kinds of evil, can civilization progress? The Iraqi people have suffered from the disasters of the war brought by the United States. Do we want the Iraqi people to cooperate with the United States?

The affirmative party 3 said to everyone: We have learned such a story: ants suddenly encountered a fire on the way forward. Many ants quickly formed a ball and rolled quickly to escape the sea of ????fire. Just imagine, if everyone is scrambling to escape, and if there is no team spirit, it would be strange if the tiny ant family is not completely wiped out!

The counter-participant 2 said to everyone: I would like to ask my fellow debaters, do you cooperate or compete during the exam? If you cooperate, it is cheating!

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: Isn’t it also a kind of competition for other countries to participate in the Olympic Games? Could it be that athletes from all over the world cooperate and share the gold medals equally?

The affirmative side 4 said to everyone: I would like to ask my fellow debaters, is it a mistake for the teacher to let us do cooperative learning as much as possible in the classroom?

Anti-party 1 would like to say to everyone: International competition is becoming more complex. I would like to ask my fellow debaters, what keeps the market dynamic? It is obvious that competition is more conducive to the progress of civilization than cooperation, and is more conducive to the metabolism and overall progress of society.

(To the front) The 3rd affirmative said to everyone: If athletes from various countries do not cooperate with each other, can the competition in the Olympic Games be successful?

(To the front) Opposition 4 said to everyone: Opponent 4, isn’t our cooperative learning today just to get into society in the future and better participate in competition?

The affirmative side 2 will tell everyone: People who are not good at cooperation will find others difficult to get along with wherever they go. People who are good at cooperation will get along well with anyone they meet.

Argument 1 versus Argument 4: The United Nations' "International Commission on Education for the 21st Century" proposed the "Four Pillars of Education" to guide the cultivation of talents. The so-called "four pillars" refer to learning to recognize, learning to do, learning to cooperate and learning to survive.

The host said to everyone: Sorry, please pause. Due to time constraints, I can't let you play as much as you want.

Record 4 of the debate on whether cooperation or competition can make civilization progress more

Summary speech stage:

The host said to everyone: After a wonderful and fierce freedom Debate, now we ask students from the opposing side to summarize their speeches.

The fourth argument of the opposing party said to everyone:

The opponent’s first argument emphasized that cooperation is more important than competition in modern society, which is an exaggeration. We have no eternal enemies, but we have eternal national and national interests. To safeguard our interests, only competition is the most effective way. The coexistence of greatness and frustration just shows that competition has richer connotations and more charming charm than cooperation.

Finally, I would like to emphasize once again that competition in modern society can make civilization progress more than cooperation:

First, competition is the fundamental driving force for the development of modern society.

Second, competition can ensure a society that prioritizes efficiency while taking into account fairness. Promote the correct application of rights through political competition; clarify the truth, goodness and beauty of the human spirit through cultural competition, etc.

The debate is coming to an end. The competition tests our knowledge and wisdom, and also allows us to fight for our glory and dreams. Therefore, let us sincerely say: thank you for this great era of competition!

The host said to the 4 negative debaters: Thank you to the 4th negative debaters. Finally, we asked the 4th affirmative debaters to summarize their speeches, which also lasted 5 minutes.

The 4th argument of the affirmative says to everyone: Dear judges and friends!

The opponent 1 has repeatedly emphasized the importance of competition, but we would like to ask the opponent to clearly realize that there is a lot of cooperation in the competition process itself, and competition is to promote better cooperation. , and there are still many problems in competition, such as competition making people narrow-minded and selfish, easily causing the deterioration of interpersonal relationships, etc.

The fierce competition in reality makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss as to what to do, and even suffer from serious psychological disorders. How can these prove that competition promotes the progress of civilization? Only cooperation can promote the progress of civilization.

First of all, cooperation can help people survive better. , society is becoming increasingly complex. Only by joining hands and cooperating with each other can we tide over the difficulties.

Secondly, cooperation produces talents that are more adaptable to the development of modern society than competition. Cultivate good psychological qualities such as caring for others, solidarity and friendship.

Third, cooperation is more conducive to promoting the development of science than competition. Isn't the successful development of my country's "Shenzhou 5" spacecraft the result of the joint cooperation of many scientific researchers?

Fourth, cooperation can promote social stability more than competition. The success in fighting "floods", "SARS" and "bird flu" is the best example.

Let us join hands and cooperate together to create a more civilized future!

The host said to everyone: Time is up, thank you to the affirmative 4 students.

Epilogue:

The host said to everyone: In the midst of the war of words, between cooperation and competition, which one can make civilization progress more? Let the judging teachers figure it out!