How to reply to hr's cynicism about job seekers?

There must be something wrong with HR satirizing the behavior of job seekers. Some companies did not do strict checks when recruiting HR, and the professionalism of HR needs to be improved. The recruitment process of enterprises was originally a good opportunity to promote corporate image and increase the interaction between enterprises and the public, but HR of some enterprises obviously failed to seize this opportunity. Enterprises should attach importance to the selection and training of HR, and their moral level and legal awareness should be included in the assessment. The professional qualities that HR should have include three points. First, professional skills and knowledge, that is, professional ideas and skills can be used to solve problems; The second is humanistic cultivation. HR faces people and needs to use knowledge flexibly in practical work. Third, morality and legal literacy, that is, HR should not only understand the law, but also understand that the law is the minimum morality, and treat the words and deeds of candidates according to moral norms. Moral requirements can be said to be the foundation of HR, the basis of behavior and the source of development. A typical feature of the employment process is to actively fight for rights, which makes the concept of two-way matching and two-way evaluation between employees and enterprises more and more popular. During the interview, some HR will deliberately ask some sharp questions to make things difficult for job seekers. At this time, if you refute them face to face, you will click into the' trap' they set. You can argue through the following reply to safeguard your rights and interests. 1, if the other party says, "We need graduates from famous universities, and you didn't graduate from famous universities." You can say humorously, "I heard that Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard University either." ? 2. If the other person says, "Your experience is too simple, but we need people with rich social experience." You can answer with a smile: "I am sure that if I join your company by accident, I will soon become an experienced person in society." I wish I had this experience. " 3. If the other party says, "Why is your major not in line with the position you are applying for?" You can answer skillfully: "It is said that the most sought-after talents in the 2 1 century are compound talents, and the inspiration of laymen may exceed that of experts because they have no fixed thinking and rules." 4. If the other person says, "You are too introverted, it is probably not suitable for our profession." You can answer with a smile: "It is said that introverts often have the qualities of dedication and persistence, and I am good at listening, because I think we should leave more opportunities to speak to others." 5. If the other party says, "Your old company is so good, but you want to leave, is it because you can't get along with your old company and you will move to a new place?" If you are tongue-tied, speechless, angry, quarrelling or blushing, you will fall into the trap set by the other party. In this case, the candidate should be calm and understand that the other party is "acting" and there is no need to compete with him. 6. For the fresh graduates, the interviewer will ask: "Your relevant work experience is relatively lacking. What do you think? " For female college students, the interviewer may ask: "Women often lack confidence in their abilities. What do you think? " If your answer is "not necessarily", "I don't think so" or "not at all", then maybe you have fallen into the trap, because the other person wants to hear your opinion on this issue, not a simple and blunt rebuttal. For such a question, you can use "this statement is not necessarily all right", "this view is worth exploring" and "this statement has some truth, but I'm afraid I can't accept it completely" as the opening remarks, and then express your different opinions diplomatically. 7. The interviewer sometimes asks some embarrassing questions to job seekers. For example, "your academic performance is not very good." What's wrong? " "Judging from your resume, you didn't have any experience as a student cadre during your college years, will this affect your work ability" and so on. When confronted with such problems, some job seekers often put on a defensive posture involuntarily, and even severely hit back at each other. Doing so will only fall into the trap of overconfidence, leading to "arrogant" evaluation. The best way to answer this question is not to hide and avoid it, nor to be too straightforward, but to talk about shortcomings, discuss advantages and skillfully bypass it. 8. For example, when the other party says that your academic performance is not very good, you can admit it frankly and then bring out your other advantages by analyzing the reasons. For example, I didn't do well in school because I was the head of the club and put too much energy into the club activities. Although my hard work in the club has also brought me a lot of gains, my academic performance is not the best, which has been bothering me. When I realized this, I have been trying to correct my deviation. In short, the relationship between the interviewer and the job seeker is multidimensional, and the presentation of the actual relationship mainly depends on both sides. Harmonious and efficient interview, on the one hand, job seekers should be confident and generous, and when answering the interviewer's questions, they should tell the answers properly, actively and completely, so as to "finish what they started"; On the other hand, the interviewer should maintain an objective and rational attitude, make a comprehensive judgment on job seekers, and consciously guide job seekers to have two-way and benign communication and exchanges with them.