A sentence from Mr. Lu Xun ~ How to say it specifically?

The original words are like this: dreaming is free, but dreaming is not free. Dreams are real dreams, and it is inevitable to lie when you say dreams.

The name of this essay is "I heard about dreams", and the original text is as follows: dreaming is free, but talking about dreams is not free. Dreams are real dreams, and it is inevitable to lie when you say dreams.

On New Year's Day, I got a new year's extra large of Oriental Magazine, and finally I had a "New Year's Dream" and asked.

"China in my dream" and "Personal life" were answered by 140 people. I understand the reporter's painstaking efforts.

Yes, I think speech is not free. It is better to talk about dreams and the truth in dreams than the so-called truth.

I was happy to turn it over and know that the reporter had failed greatly.

Before I got this oversized book, I met a contributor. He saw the printed book in front of me and said his answer.

The case has been deleted by the capitalist, and the dream he said is actually not like this. This shows that although capitalists can't stop people from dreaming,

And if you say it, if you are in power and want to interfere, you will never be free. This has been a major failure of journalists.

But we don't care about this dream change case, just look at the dream written. As the reporter said, almost all the answers have come.

Is an intellectual. First of all, no one feels that life is unstable. Secondly, many people dream of a good society in the future.

But "Ah, One World" is very "deviant" atmosphere (I added the last three sentences, but the reporter didn't say it).

But then he became a little "crazy". He got a theory from there and divided more than 100 dreams into two parts.

Class, saying that those who dream of a good society are dreaming of "Tao" and "heresy". Authentic dreams should be "ambition" and hard work.

Let "ambition" become an empty thing. But Confucius said that "everyone has his own opinion" and finally agreed with Zeng.

Point, just because its "ambition" conforms to Confucius' "Tao".

In fact, it is a reporter's dream of "carrying the road", which is very rare. The article is written awake, and the problem is very close.

In the "psychological test", the interviewee should dream a dream that suits his occupation, status and identity.

(Of course, the deleted person is not in this case), even if it seems to be "carrying the road", it is also for the sake of "propaganda" in the future.

Meaning, there is no reason, although some people dream of "everyone has food", others dream of "classless society", and the dream is "big"

Some people are "peaceful", but few people dream of class struggle, white terror, bombing and cruelty before building such a society.

If you don't dream, a good society will not come, and even a better society will come.

A dream, an empty dream, is nothing but teaching people to enter this empty dream.

However, some people want to realize this "dream". They don't talk, but do, dream of the future and strive to realize it.

This gift of the future. Because of this fact, many intellectuals can't help saying that this seems to be a dream of "carrying Tao", but it

Actually, it's not Tao, it's Tao. If we want to be concise, we should say "Tao".

Why "pretend"? Yue: It's for the problem of eating now and in the future.

We are still bound by old ideas. When it comes to eating, we feel almost vulgar. But I didn't despise the respondents.

Meaning of. The reporter of Oriental Magazine also quoted Buddha Leuther's opinion as "positive" in his "thoughts after reading".

The dream of "Zong" is to "show everyone's inner secrets without social function". But Buddha Leuther dreamed of being suppressed.

Root-Why are people depressed? This has something to do with social system, habits and so on, but it doesn't matter whether you have a dream or not.

It is inappropriate to say, ask and analyze. The reporter didn't think of this layer, so he ran into the capitalist's brush.

Let's go However, I think everyone must be dissatisfied with the introduction of "depression theory" to interpret dreams.

However, I'm afraid that Buddha Leute has a few pennies and is full, so he doesn't find it difficult to eat, but only pays attention to sex.

Desire. There are many people in the same situation as him, so clap your hands for joy. Indeed, he also told us that there were many daughters.

Love father, son loves mother more, just because of the opposite sex. But not long after the baby was born, both men and women are sharp.

Lips, turn your head around. Does it want to kiss the opposite sex? No, everyone knows: eat!

The root of appetite is really deeper than sexual desire. I don't feel sick when I open my mouth to love and close my mouth to love letters.

We don't have to say we want to eat. Because it is a waking dream, it is not true, because what is the topic?

"dream", and as the reporter said, we are "material needs far exceed spiritual pursuit", so we take C.

Ensos (also quoted from the Ruse language of the Buddha) made part of the contents public when the guardianship seemed to be lifted. in fact

It is also "posting slogans and shouting slogans in dreams", but it is not active, and some may not reach the superficial "slogan"

On the contrary.

Times have changed so much, and the rice bowl is so difficult. Thinking about the present and the future, some people can only say that their dreams are small.

The bourgeoisie (although some people have designated me as a "feudal remnant" or an "indigenous bourgeoisie", I will still designate it as my own.

Class), it is very caring for each other, but there is no need to keep it a secret.

As for other celebrities whose dreams are hermits and fishermen, they are completely different from their true nature. In fact, they are just worried about their jobs.

Crispy, but to expand the scope of eating, from the palace to the garden, from the foreign market to Yu Shanze, than those mentioned above

Ambition is much greater, so I won't say much here.

January first.