Joke Collection Website - News headlines - Why do "old folk Chinese doctors" always hide in the folk and refuse to show up to solve medical problems?

Why do "old folk Chinese doctors" always hide in the folk and refuse to show up to solve medical problems?

There is a saying in the field of Chinese medicine that experts in the private sector are very disdainful of Chinese medicine hospitals recognized by the state. But why are the folk "old Chinese medicine practitioners" who have cured countless AIDS, hypertension and diabetes in stories and legends never willing to make public appearances, and they are really recognized by the country and the world, and they always have the appetite of countless patients in the stories, but all of them are Wang Lin and Zhang Wuben.

These people, with loud slogans, wonderful hands to rejuvenate, and experts in Xinglin ... If you can really come back to life, why don't you try to perform on TV? If the problem cannot be cured, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to the crime of intentional injury and intentional homicide. How many people dare to try?

And now the media is so developed that your TV station can't find it. Why not find a live broadcast of Aauto, especially those who claim to grow up in a week after receiving bones? You broadcast live every day, with hundreds of millions of viewers. If you can really grow up in a week, are you afraid of being excluded?

To tell the truth, folk experts and the like were ok twenty years ago. Now it is a transparent society. Mobile phones can take photos and broadcast live on the internet. Mules or horses come out for a walk. If you have the ability, why worry about not being on the table? Therefore, these so-called folk experts, if you open a black clinic to deceive people, forget it. The sky is high and the emperor is far away. You trick a few people into cooking a few meals, and no one cares about you. When Zhuge Liang scolded Wang Lang for dying, he said it well: "You can only hide your head and find ways to feed yourself.". I'm afraid it will be like Lei Lei. Finally, I lied to myself, not knowing who I really am or whether I can beat myself. I had to perform in front of the whole country, but I was beaten to the ground-it seemed to be still live. Whether in the field of traditional Chinese medicine or other fields, this sentence itself is funny. The difference between professional and non-professional in any field is far beyond our imagination. If you compare your hobbies with other people's occupations, you will be hit in the face. Just like those Tai Chi masters, a third-rate professional player can KO them in a few seconds.

Stories and legendary masters who have cured countless incurable diseases will always appear in psoriasis advertisements on telephone poles around railway stations. Of course, some of them have evolved into masters and appeared in major media. Hu, Wang Lin, and other ten doctors and nine liars rely not only on deception, but on betting that many leek believers believe that the "master is among the people" and can harvest at any time.

Among the drugs promoted in Liu Hongbin, some media contacted the relevant person in charge of one of the pharmaceutical companies, and the other party said that Liu Hongbin did promote the company's drugs, and the drugs were real, but Liu Hongbin's propaganda film exaggerated the curative effect. The person in charge also said in an interview that Liu Hongbin's related medical publicity videos look like news talk shows, but they are actually advertisements. As for Liu Hongbin's identity, he is not sure whether he is a doctor, a professor or an expert. According to him, he has never seen Liu Hongbin. Three years ago, his agent approached him, hoping to sell drugs. Subsequently, the agent found Liu Hongbin in Beijing to shoot related promotional videos, and the company sold the drugs to the agent. Regarding the products endorsed by Liu Hongbin, we dialed the "official order number" at the bottom of the screen, and the other party told us that it had been used for less than one month and had been used by others. "

At that time, it was reported that Gansu Satellite TV released a TV shopping video advertisement of Wang Yaofeng Tongfang, claiming that "taking medicine to set bones was used by the emperor of that year, which can fill bone holes, and 3 yuan can cure rheumatic bone diseases in one day"; After investigation, it was a health care product approved by the local family planning commission, but the health care product illegally publicized its efficacy and claimed to be a "secret recipe of the court", which was a false advertisement. Also on 20 14, in "Tangtong 5.0", the product promoted by Liu Hongbin as an expert of Peking University was officially named "Tangniaoling Tablet", and the manufacturer was Shanxi Kang Hua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and its advertisement was notified by Shandong American Food and Drug Administration as illegal drug, medical device and health food advertisement. There are also media reports that Shanxi Kang Hua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which specializes in Chinese herbal pieces, detected Sudan red and Sudan red in its Gujin Pill capsules during the special sampling inspection of Chinese patent medicine dyeing organized by the US Food and Drug Administration in Shanxi on 20 15.

Some advertisements claim to "develop new treatments and subvert traditional treatment concepts" and use fake experts to fabricate a set of flawed theories; Fabricate an authoritative organization that doesn't exist at all, and even deceive patients who don't know the truth under the banner of "Nobel Prize in Medicine". For example, an advertisement claimed that their medicine was recommended by China Diabetes Association, and the recommended expert Wang Moumou was the vice president of China Diabetes Association. In fact, there is no "China Diabetes Association" in China, and the chairman (president) and vice-chairman (vice-president) of the Diabetes Association of the Chinese Medical Association are not propagandists at all.

First, the theoretical basis of Chinese medicine is absurd, so Chinese medicine is completely backward. Its curative effect is false, and it is a placebo effect. Therefore, it is necessary to "waste medicine and medicine." The representative figures are so-and-so of the shell network and so-and-so of Central South University. In scientific research, the number of people who hold this view should be around 2%.

Second, the theoretical basis of TCM is pseudoscience, and TCM is backward in general. Because all traditional Chinese medicines have no evidence to prove effective, and it has been proved that more than 80% of plants use medicine to induce cancer, it is necessary to "waste medicine and try medicine". Some people in the Association for Science and Technology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences also support this view. Several super bosses XXX and XXX in astronomy agree with this view. In the field of scientific research, almost 5% people hold this view.

Third, the theoretical basis of Chinese medicine is wrong. Although most traditional Chinese medicines are ineffective, there are still a few effective ones. Therefore, it is necessary to "waste medicine and save medicine." The representative figures are so-and-so of Chinese University of Science and Technology and so-and-so of Union Medical College. In the field of scientific research, almost 5% people hold this view.

Fourth, the theoretical basis of TCM is wrong, but TCM does have some magical effects. Many prescriptions are wrong, but there are still many treasures worth digging. Therefore, it is necessary to "save medicine and try medicine." Most people hold this view. In the field of scientific research, almost 50% people hold this view.

Fifth, the theoretical basis of TCM is vague, because TCM theory is incompatible with modern scientific theory and is not a system. But Chinese medicine should not be abolished, because although it is backward in general, it is still a treasure house. Some biological researchers also hold this view. Therefore, it is necessary to "save the doctor." In the field of scientific research, almost 20% people hold this view.

Sixth, the theory of traditional Chinese medicine is wrong. There is no conclusive evidence to prove the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine, but it is likely that some of them are indeed effective. Although it is effective, it should not be popularized at this stage, because it will make people mistakenly think that it is effective because the theory of traditional Chinese medicine is correct. Chinese medicine should not be popularized until we know why it is effective. Therefore, it is necessary to "suspect doctors and try drugs." In the field of scientific research, almost 8% people hold this view.