The call for property cancellation is getting louder and louder. Do you support the cancellation of property?

I oppose the abolition of property management

The country’s intention to introduce a property management system is good, but its later development has gone astray. The current property management system and model should be deeply reformed. Instead of canceling.

First of all, the property management regulations were promulgated and implemented in 2007. The starting point is to improve the living and working environment of the people and improve the level of urban management.

Besides, a good property management company can indeed improve the environment inside the community, improve the quality of the community, and responsibly undertake the warranty, security, cleaning, etc. in the community, so that the owners can sit back and relax. It also adds value to the house itself.

However, it is undeniable that a considerable number of domestic property companies are very incompetent and can be said to be profit-seeking. They completely deviate from the original intention of establishing property management fees. They do not put themselves in the shoes of the owners and only think about various ways to make money. Property and property management The owners are full of conflicts. Due to insufficient service, owners are unwilling to pay property fees, the property management company cannot collect property fees, and relevant personnel and equipment and facilities cannot keep up, forming a vicious circle, and eventually even lawsuits.

At the same time, since most new communities currently have property companies designated by developers to settle in the community in advance, if the property company does not provide adequate services later, community owners who want to change the property company must pass the vote of the owners committee before they can be removed. Re-tender again. The procedure for establishing a property owner committee in a community is quite complicated, and often the property owner committee is not established even after many years of residence. Therefore, many property management companies are emboldened to openly oppose property owners and obstruct the establishment of property owners committees in every possible way. Even if a property owners committee is established and the original property company is dismissed, it will be difficult for the new property company that invites bids to settle in smoothly. The chaos here is evident.

Finally, it is recommended that the country intensify its efforts to carry out in-depth reform of property management, starting from the most basic contradictions, breaking the current chaos of property management, and returning a healthy environment for the people to live and work in peace and contentment.

I support canceling the property. The key is who will manage the property after it is cancelled. Most of today's real estate companies only exist to make money and do some superficial work. The conflict between the property owner and the property owner is huge. I think property management should be abolished, and the owners committee should hire several managers and formulate strict job responsibilities to manage daily community cleaning, security, maintenance, etc. These daily tasks should be recruited by a single entity through the social public. Some jobs can also be recruited by a single person and directly managed by managers recruited by the community property committee. Of course, strict management responsibilities and regulations must be formulated during the implementation process. In this way, all the property fees paid by the owners can be used for their needs. Of course, nothing is that simple, and there are many things that need to be studied before canceling the property management company.

It should have been canceled long ago. Real estate is actually a platform for urban management. A few days ago, I was looking for a refund from the property management company. She replied that I was very busy. I don’t know if my thing is a thing. The charge cannot be less than a penny. It’s so busy if you terminate the service for breach of contract and get a refund.

Firmly support the cancellation of property!

The property company did nothing originally, but the annual fees were very high, especially because there were some overbearing clauses, and the service after the fee was poor. It was not worth the property fees paid, so I supported cancellation.

Nowadays, many people are particularly disgusted when talking about property companies. Basically, the relationship between property companies and owners has become antagonistic.

In many places, property management companies are basically in name only. Whether they have them or not, they are the same. Especially in the management of communities, some property companies are irresponsible, theft and other behaviors occur from time to time, and environmental sanitation is not timely. Cleaning makes people in the community feel insecure.

After the public facilities in the community were damaged, the property management company turned a blind eye, pretended not to see it, and did not ask questions, which stimulated the conflict between the owners and the property management company.

For example, the elevator here broke down, and the property management company asked the owners to raise money to repair the elevator. This caused everyone to complain, and the conflict with the property management company became deeper and deeper!

Therefore, we firmly support the cancellation of the property!

Calling for the cancellation of property management is actually because the property management company has not done a good job. As a service company, when collecting property fees, it must provide good services to the owners. The owner is the primary and the property management company is second. Unfortunately, in reality, the priorities are reversed. Not only did the property management company fail to provide good service, it was also very powerful. It was unrealistic to cancel the property. Owners also need the property management company to provide daily services. It is impossible to do everything by themselves. It is best to introduce some more reasonable property management regulations and not restrict property rights too much. Big, it is most practical to do a good job in service.

Property management companies are a new industry that emerged after the 1990s. Once they are surrounded by walls, they become private territory, and health and safety are your own business. This has become an excuse for the government to shirk its social responsibilities and leave it to the market to solve community health and safety problems. In fact, the community is also the basic area of ??society. Generally, grassroots organizations of neighborhood committees are established. The health and safety of these basic areas should be borne by the government. Citizens should not bear all the responsibility themselves. Can the safety of citizens be guaranteed by the security of the property? Can the sanitation of the community be kept beautiful and clean by just a few aunts? Everyone must understand the truth that communities are also part of society, and the government has responsibilities. There is a basis for canceling the property management company.

I support the cancellation of properties. The reason why many people are in favor of canceling property management is mainly because the property management work in the community is too difficult to satisfy. Many real estate companies do not do anything practical except collecting property fees, and they are very overbearing. If the owner does not pay the property fee, water and power outages are common. Nowadays, many high-rise buildings use credit cards to go up and down the stairs. If the property owner does not pay the property fee, he can only climb the stairs if the card cannot be swiped.

The service attitude of some properties is poor, and they have no sense of serving community owners, and they look more like yamen than yamen. Some properties post advertisements in community public spaces or elevators to make profits, and these have nothing to do with the owners. Whether the property is good or not depends on the four major areas of community greening, maintenance, safety, and sanitation. In many properties, there is basically no greening, and maintenance has been urged by the owners many times. Not to mention sanitation, they are dirty and messy. Many walls are covered with stains and no one has cleaned them.

Of course, if the property is cancelled, there is a practical problem that must be faced, and that is how to ensure the daily operation of the community. Should the owners committee hire a professional team to take care of various tasks in the community, or use other methods to keep the community running.

Canceling the property is not the purpose. In the final analysis, as a community owner, you hope that your community will have complete service facilities in all aspects and give people the warmth and comfort of home.

Support the abolition of property management. The work of property management can be completely replaced by the community. Nowadays, the professional division of labor is very detailed, and existing property work can be subcontracted to professional companies for operation. There are cleaning companies for sanitation, security companies for security, greening companies for landscaping, maintenance companies for maintenance, etc. In addition to maintaining a group of so-called managers, property companies basically do nothing but make phone calls to collect property management fees, and they also act arbitrarily over the owners. There are still many illegal real estate properties, and the majority of property owners are calling for a crackdown on criminals and evil real estate forces first. I also admit that there are a small number of properties here, and their services are not bad, but most or even the vast majority of properties are just profit-seeking and have become candy for the owners. Can't get rid of it, can't drive it away. Therefore, we strongly call on the state to introduce relevant policies to cancel the existing property companies, which are deeply resented by the majority of property owners, and to replace them with grassroots government agencies and community organizations. It is conducive to strengthening social harmony and promoting social stability.

I support the abolition of property management, because now the property management is not serving the owners at all, but just to make money. Many residential properties in the fifth-tier cities where I am just arrange for two retired old people to look at the gate of the community. Just hire a few cleaners to clean the house, and that's it. There is no management or service at all. In order to collect parking fees, the roads in the community are often full of all kinds of vehicles. In severe cases, even small cars can't pass.

There once was a fire in the kitchen of a family in our community. The fire truck arrived quickly after the alarm was called. However, the gate of the community was blocked by cars parked on the roadside, making it impossible to get in. We temporarily found Even though people moved their cars, they still couldn't find anyone. The fire brigade had no way to spread water from the gate of the community to the building where the fire broke out. This was a distance of more than 100 meters! It took about 20 minutes to wait for the firefighters' hose to be deployed to the area where the fire broke out.