People should be equal and should learn to be equal. As some scholars have pointed out, we cannot cede the right to use slogans such as "freedom", "equality" and "fraternity" to capitalist countries.

People should be equal and should learn to be equal. As some scholars have pointed out, we cannot cede the right to use slogans such as "freedom", "equality" and "fraternity" to capitalist countries. Socialism should realize real freedom, equality, and freedom that are higher than capitalism. Fraternity. How to achieve equality between people? Officials must learn to be equal. The key is who are they for? If he becomes an official for the common people and the common people, then he will think that being an official is just a different division of labor, nothing special, and he will treat others equally. If being an official is just for oneself, for one's own power, and to be domineering and prosperous, then it may lead to oppression and exploitation of those below, subservience and flattery to those above, and equality will only remain in the declaration of being an official.

Rich people must learn to be equal. Wealth and poverty exist objectively at this stage, but some rich people let their money burn so much that their desires are endless and they want to do anything. They also believe in the fallacy that "money can make the world go round". This kind of Every word and deed of a person is strongly imprinted with the traces of "wealth and arrogance". Why? Because they believe that the standard for measuring right and wrong is not the truth, but the amount of money. Such people cannot talk about equality and inequality. Celebrities must learn to be equal. What's the name? When a person makes a certain contribution to society, the society gives him a spiritual reputation and honor. Therefore, fame is not a privilege to be superior to others, nor is it a right that can be used to do evil. However, some celebrities just misunderstand it. They insist on putting on the airs and airs of celebrities, show off the temper of celebrities at every turn, do not abide by public ethics, do everything possible to evade taxes, and regard the law as child's play... Such celebrities certainly do not will be equal. Rich people must learn to be equal. Some employers even ask female college students to wear a "three-point dress" when recruiting, and ask them to answer weird questions such as "If a client asks you to sleep with you, will you have the spirit of sacrifice?" The examiner's reason is high-sounding for the cause and the interests of the unit, which seems noble, but in fact, it is at the expense of infringing on people's privacy and other basic human rights. It is a very obvious "bullying of the weak" by the strong. , is a blasphemy against human nature, a blatant blasphemy in the name of nobleness! If you have a "position" you can insult others? ! You have a "salary" and you can invade someone's privacy? ! Pretending to be a giver just exposes the inequality in personality, a kind of barbaric personality discrimination.

Snobbers must learn to be equal. Villains are definitely snobbish, and snobbishness is the "patent" of villains. The concept of snobbery is vast and complex. Being greedy for money is snobbery; bullying the weak and fearing the hard is snobbish; hating the poor and loving the rich is snobbish; working as a stooge is snobbish; dividing people into three, six or nine grades is snobbish... In short, snobbery itself is inequality.

So, should ordinary people learn to be equal? It should be. This requires the following points: (1) Learn to be fair. The standard for evaluating a person or a phenomenon cannot be based on a person's status (such as the size of the official, the amount of wealth, the level of fame), and you cannot follow the crowd. , not blindly follow, but must be based on social contracts and social moral standards; (2) Treating people cannot be based on one's own likes and dislikes, but must work hard to overcome worldly prejudices; (3) The basis of equality is benevolence, for which everyone must have "We should regard people as human beings because they are human beings" (Kant). The people mentioned here are all people, all compatriots, not special people of special groups.