There are more than 500 words of current affairs commentary on Time of Death of Tiger Biting in Ningbo Zoo. Have yourself.

Life is poor, and the rules should be followed.

The responsibility of tiger biting this time needs to be clarified, but it also leaves a warning metaphor-fear of rules, which is often a kind of self-protection.

At about 2 pm on the 29th (the second day of the New Year's Day), a tiger bite happened at Youngor Zoo in Ningbo. Some onlookers said that the bitten man was bitten into the park by a tiger while teasing the tiger at close range; Another source said that at the time of the incident, there was a breeder feeding the tiger in Hushan, while the man climbed over the fence. At present, the tiger that bit people has been killed, and the man died after being taken to hospital for treatment. The videos and pictures of men being bitten were uploaded to the Internet, which was shocking.

The tragedy of tiger biting, which happened in the festive node of "the first year of Yuan Dynasty, auspicious day", became more and more serious. Life is miserable, and the man involved died in the gate of hell, which makes people feel sad and sad: his death declared that the last turning point of the tragedy was blocked. There is no doubt that the sudden end of such a life is bereavement for the family, and it is also sad for you and me.

We should show sympathy for the deceased, but the right or wrong of this matter still needs to be clarified, which is also an explanation for all parties involved and public opinion. At present, some information is still unclear, such as how men were dragged into the tiger garden by tigers; Is it true that online men "evaded tickets and entered by mistake" and "crossed privately"? Some media reported that the man was taken into the park by a tiger at 14:30 and was rescued at 15:43. Is there any delay in the rescue? There are also tourists who report that there is no protective net installed in the glass that closes the tiger ... these question marks need to be straightened. Now the local police have been involved in the investigation, hoping that they can use the park surveillance video to carefully verify and find out and announce the truth as soon as possible.

This tragedy is easy to remind people of animal injuries in many zoos in the past. These incidents vary widely in specific circumstances, but the responsibilities of zoo managers and tourists in such accidents are exactly the same.

Although human death is sad, it is still necessary to return to the framework of taking law as the criterion. For animal injuries in zoos, the Tort Liability Law clearly applies "inversion of burden of proof": "If animals in zoos cause damage to others, zoos should bear tort liability, but those who can prove that they have fulfilled their management duties will not bear the responsibility". The only legal case of zoo exemption is to prove that it has "fulfilled its management duties"-attention is supervision, not just reminding.

Whether a man crosses the river between Hushan and the tourist area and enters the "forbidden zone" or not, the zoo has endless isolation and the responsibility of saving people on the spot, which is related to the division of responsibilities between the two sides. In terms of reasonable liability for accidents, there is a Hande formula: B (accident prevention cost) < P (accident probability) ×L (accident loss). In other words, the responsibility of the parties is inversely proportional to the cost of avoiding accidents.

On the Internet, many people "sympathize with the killed tiger". This is a perceptual judgment, which combines many assumptions based on "gossip". If you kill a tiger in order to save people in an emergency, it is in line with the principle of humanity and the elements of "emergency avoidance" in civil law to take emergency measures such as "shooting". Of course, it also depends on whether tiger hunting is "during" or "after", and whether the specific situation is appropriate.

The truth is the basis of the conclusion. At present, many statements that aim the bull's-eye at the dead are too radical, and the tragedy cannot be "segmented". But outside the case, some reminders are not unnecessary: for example, keeping a sense of rules. Many times, we only see the low cost and benefits of ignoring the rules, but forget the risks behind the rules being ignored.

This year's Spring Festival Evening, the comic dialogue "Fantasy in the New Tiger's Mouth" was very popular. People fell beside the tiger's mouth and made a bunch of jokes. But in reality, people are not allowed to "joke" at the cost of falling into the jaws of death. When you play in the zoo, you must strictly abide by the rules. Even if you are curious, you should stay within the boundaries set by rules and reason. It's okay to be a simile, but it's terrible to be a practical guide.

The dead are gone, but Yin Jian is still here. The responsibility of this tiger bite in Ningbo has yet to be clarified and must be clarified, but its metaphor is still a warning-fear of rules is often a way of self-protection, and the lack of awareness of rules is often the beginning of disaster.