To analyze the slogan "If you can't learn, you must learn from the dead", please use the relevant knowledge of political and ideological subjects in middle schools.

First of all, I want to explain that when I was in junior high school, there was only one course in politics, and politics mainly focused on productivity and relations of production, so there was no so-called political thought course, so I didn't know what the political thought in middle school was, so I explained it from the perspective of philosophy and logic, hoping that the analysis would be helpful to you, and then you could sit in the right place with what you learned.

This sentence is undoubtedly wrong, or unscientific.

(1) If you change this sentence to "it's never too old to learn" or a little more vulgar "as long as you don't learn to die, you will learn to die", it may also make people feel very sympathetic. But "learning from death" and "learning from death" are two completely different realms. The so-called "never too old to learn" represents a concept of time, that is, remember to study all your life and give yourself a new qualitative improvement. This kind of learning is interesting, or related to the improvement of personal quality; Learning from death is different. It often corresponds to a kind of exam-oriented education, especially when we are faced with bugs such as senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination, that is, in a special period, regardless of people's physiological characteristics, we blindly learn from death in order to extend the time to increase the so-called exam scores. This kind of learning state is not very good, or it is a kind of morbid state, which can not reach the realm of "learning from the dead" because "learning from the dead" can only maintain one.

(2) So this involves some questions about learning interest, or exam-oriented education and quality education, or the degree and efficiency of individual learning efforts, and so on. It depends on whether these points can be related to your textbook knowledge. I think so many divergent ideas should always be in line with the contents of the book. Hehe, in fact, the unscientific point of "learning to die" is really expounded, as long as you compare it with the difference of "learning to die", as mentioned in the first point above.

It's definitely not a standard answer, but I hope it can inspire you ~