A man in Heilongjiang asked the school for compensation when he moved his dining car and was cut down: the medical expenses cost tens of thousands. What happened?

Many places seem to be quite safe, and no one will say that there is danger beforehand. If something goes wrong, family members or parties will complain about potential safety hazards, and relevant management has not taken preventive measures. If the compensation amount is not much, the management chooses to spend money to eliminate the disaster. If the compensation amount is high, it is difficult to negotiate privately. Only through court prosecution can the responsibility be determined, which is fair to both parties.

It's just a little troublesome to sue in court. Some people prefer to find media exposure and hope to negotiate privately. There was a dispute in Harbin, Heilongjiang. Family members feel that there are security risks and ask the school to take responsibility. They also want to negotiate privately. The school believes that legal channels should be taken to let family members go to court for prosecution.

Mr. Li, who lives in Daye Community, and his wife set up a stall in the night market to do small business. He has a dining car for setting up stalls. When he comes back or doesn't go out to set up a stall on weekdays, he will find an open space in the community to put the dining car. Because of the epidemic, the couple have been resting. He parked the dining car next to a low iron roof. Unexpectedly, this is why his wife was cut into hospital.

I'm still in the hospital, and I haven't passed the critical period, so I can only be treated conservatively. If you fail to follow up, you may have to amputate, and the medical expenses have already cost about 65,438+10,000. He felt that the property unit of the canopy should be responsible. After many inquiries, he finally found the property unit "heilongjiang institute of technology", but when he went to the school to defend his rights, the school did not give an accurate statement, so he turned to the media for help.

At the scene, Mr. Li also said the basis for safeguarding rights. Although the dining car is owned by my own family and moved by my wife, the canopy has potential safety hazards and the edge should not be so sharp. Schools should set up warning signs. Many residents also expressed their opinions and basically supported Mr. Li's statement. This place has great security risks, and many children are in the brains nearby. If they hit the canopy, it is very dangerous.

So what is the school's response? The reporter and Mr. Li went to the school to ask about the situation. The meaning of school is also very simple. Let him go to court to sue or find a police station. As long as the responsibilities of both parties can be clearly defined, the school will compensate according to the proportion of responsibilities, but this is a bit difficult for Teacher Li. I have also looked for communities and police stations before, but I can't determine the division of responsibilities. The community and the police station can only cooperate to provide information on how his wife was injured, and the rest can only persuade him to go to court for prosecution.

At present, the school has also been advancing. Next, after the students have a holiday, the school will rectify the potential safety hazards. In accidental injury claims, the word "potential safety hazard" frequently appears, which also represents the improvement of Chinese people's legal awareness, but claims should also have specific requirements and consider how much responsibility they have. As an adult, I have to bear a lot of responsibility for being cut down for moving the dining car.

On the one hand, it is illegal for a dining car to enter the community, not a parking place. On the other hand, it is not the first time to stop, and the canopy has not just been built. Today, the medical expenses have reached 65,438+10,000. People haven't passed the critical period, and they don't know how much it will cost. If private negotiation is difficult to succeed, litigation is the fastest way. Although I accidentally cut myself, the school must have the responsibility to sue the court on the grounds of security risks, but there is still a difference more or less. What do you think of this?