Will it cause legal disputes if lane blocking devices are installed at highway toll stations to force illegal vehicles to slow down and stop to pay?

The legality of toll-free traffic arresters: 1. According to the "Highway Law", no unit or individual may damage, move without authorization, or alter highway ancillary facilities. The so-called highway ancillary facilities refer to highway protection, drainage, maintenance, management, services, traffic safety, ferry transportation, monitoring, communication, toll collection and other facilities, equipment and special buildings set up to protect and maintain highways and ensure safe and smooth highways. , structures, etc. When turning on the toll collection equipment at a toll station, you must also turn on the traffic arrester. The two devices are started and run at the same time.

2: According to the "Regulations on the Administration of Toll Roads", toll road operators have the right to collect vehicle tolls from vehicles traveling on toll roads upon approval in accordance with the law. Personnel driving on toll roads shall follow the regulations of toll roads. Relevant regulations require safe driving and truthful payment of tolls based on the actual mileage traveled and actual loaded tonnage. No one is allowed to engage in activities that disrupt the operation and management order of toll roads.

3: The expressway management department shall post promotional materials in conspicuous locations of toll stations before and after the installation of traffic arresters, install reflective signs on highway trunk lines and toll station entrances, and make service reminder cards to passersby. Vehicles publicize information about traffic arresters and strive to make it known to everyone. Try to detect and eliminate vehicle faults as early as possible. While publicity is given to passing vehicles, it is also a warning to drivers who try to force their way into the post to evade paying tolls.

Some people may say that I did not trespass maliciously, but that the vehicle itself was faulty and could not brake, resulting in "negligent trespassing." Isn't it a bit unreasonable to puncture my tire because of this? ? Expressways have made great efforts in many aspects to prevent "accidental trespassing". For example, the main highway to the toll station generally requires some climbing sections, and the main highway to the toll station usually has a long driving distance. If the vehicle brakes If the device fails, the purpose of deceleration can often be achieved through the climbing section; for another example, reflective warning signs are set up at the entrance and exit of the toll station so that drivers can detect and deal with problems early when they find problems with the vehicle; install deceleration at the vehicle's exit With forced deceleration, etc. The toll blocking device will only be activated for vehicles that maliciously attempt to evade tolls. Even if the car arrester is activated, it will "slowly deflate" the vehicle. The vehicle will not be able to move until the vehicle has traveled one to two hundred meters, thus avoiding safety threats to the driver and passengers due to a sudden tire blowout.

To sum up, I personally believe that the installation and use of car arresters has a legal basis and is used reasonably. In the early stage of protecting national property from infringement, the losses to illegal vehicles will be minimized, and there is no subjective fault. There is no infringement, and the increased use of traffic arresters is just an improvement on the original charging method.