Hangzhou subway incident

The Hangzhou subway incident should not only be regarded as a subway collapse incident, but should be a kind of government dereliction of duty in essence. The most fundamental factor of this incident lies in the lack of government supervision, and this responsibility should ultimately be attributed to a kind of government dereliction of duty.

First, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) failed to supervise the planning of Hangzhou subway. The final plan of Hangzhou subway is curved subway. The subway should be as straight as possible, so try to be as straight as possible. The safest and fastest route is the most reasonable route. This is the common sense of subway design, but in the end, the construction route of Hangzhou subway is far from the route decided by the National Development and Reform Commission. Why did the National Development and Reform Commission agree to such a change? Can administration really replace technology? The role of real estate developers can be seen here. Faced with such a big change (close to 50%), the National Development and Reform Commission approved it without re-argumentation, which in itself is a dereliction of duty.

The second is that the Hangzhou municipal government itself has dereliction of duty. There is no strict review system for project contracting. As a result, the China Railway Fourth Bureau subcontracted at different levels, and the actual employees did not have basic knowledge of production safety. This comes down to the responsibility of China Railway, but I think it should be counted on the Hangzhou government. The owner does not check the quality and safety of the project construction, but requires the construction party to check. How safe is this? This is the dereliction of duty of the Hangzhou government. Coupled with the continuous revision of subway lines, billions of investments have been virtually increased.

During the period of Mao Zedong, the main leaders of the Hangzhou government put forward a series of slogans to fool the people in order to consolidate their political achievements, such as "Get to work quickly", "Report to the people of Hangzhou" and "Hu Xiang has set off an all-round climax". A malfeasant, ignorant and bureaucratic government appeared naked in front of people.

Third, the function of the national safety supervision department is nominal. Zhao Tiechui put on a show in front of the media and asked China Railway Fourth Bureau if there was any safety training before taking up his post. Here I would like to ask the safety supervision department, what are you supervising? Isn't safety training part of safety supervision? I wonder if China Railway has conducted safety training? If you don't know what the hell you're supervising. What on earth are you doing with other people's money? Safety supervision department is the worst department in China, which only appears after safety accidents. The nominal function of this department makes it impossible to carry out safe production at all, and it is an incompetent department that occupies the toilet.

Fourth, the false supervision of the accident handling department. As an "expert" sent by the accident handling department, Wang Yi lied to people when he opened his mouth. Later, they parted ways because of their quarrel with the Hangzhou government. The attitude of the accident handling department to lie at the beginning is obviously to fool the masses. This is not an attitude to solve problems, but to cover up people's lives with rhetoric. This makes people wonder if we are still in the dark.

The problem of LZ can be attributed to the government's poor supervision in advance (NDRC connives at changing the line indiscriminately); Hangzhou government has nothing to do with supervision; State administration of work safety failed to perform his duties; The accident handling department failed to clarify in time.

This is a confused account written by the government to the people.