What are the component symbols and structures of subject-predicate-object complement in Chinese?

First, the subject-predicate-object complement components:

Predicate comes before predicate, predicate comes after complement, and attribute must come before subject and object, which is the main body of the sentence. If you want to analyze the sentence structure, you must first analyze the subject, predicate and object of the sentence, and then modify the subject and object as attributes. The predicate before the predicate is called adverbial, and the predicate after the predicate is called complement.

Noun phrases or clauses are a bit like the objects of sentences, some are subjects, and some are not complete subject-predicate-object structures.

Second, the subject-predicate object complement symbol:

1, the subject is two short lines;

2. Predicate is a short line;

3. The object is a wavy line;

4. The attribute is a bracket ();

5. The adverbial is in brackets [];

6. The complement is the angle bracket.

Third, the subject-predicate object complement structure:

Subject and object, definite complement, clear branches and leaves.

Attribute must precede subject and object, the former is a form and the latter is a complement.

Adverbials are sometimes placed before commas.

Extended data:

Theme type:

1. Agent Subject: The subject is the sender of the action in the sentence.

Everyone should take an active part in school activities. ("Everyone" is the subject)

2. Patient subject: The subject is the receiver of the action in the sentence.

The school newspaper has not been printed yet. (titled "School Newspaper")

3. Neutral subject: The subject in a sentence is neither the agent nor the patient, but the object to be described, explained and judged. Also called "relative subject".

We have a bright future. ("Future" is the subject and object to be described)

Xiaoming is sixteen years old. ("Xiao Ming" is the subject and object to be explained)

Beijing is the heart of the motherland. ("Beijing" is the subject and object of judgment)

The theme of Chinese is very different from that of Indo-European. Due to the lack of formal markers in Chinese, the corresponding relationship between words with different parts of speech and sentence components is more complicated. This kind of problem has always been controversial, which can be understood as the dual category of words and the corresponding relationship between words and sentence components.

Linguist Zhu believes that it is far-fetched to interpret verbs and adjectives in subject position as nominalization, which is the result of copying Indo-European grammar. Both verbs and adjectives can actually be subjects.

For example:

Running away won't solve the problem. (Escape is a verb)

Being strong is a valuable quality. (Strong is an adjective)