***Why was the shared bicycle damaged?

Question 1: Why do *** bicycles always get damaged? Nowadays, bicycle sharing, which is very popular in cities, is experiencing more and more cases of vandalism. Recently, in Kangleyong, Haizhu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, reporters witnessed sanitation workers salvaging 9 private bicycles from Yongli, including Mobike, Xiaolan, ofo, and Xiaoming. These cars, along with their other companions, were sunk into the river at some point.

In Beijing, Shanghai and other places, it is not uncommon for bicycles to encounter "man-made injuries". As an Internet economy, bicycle sharing helps build a low-cost, high-efficiency society. Sharing bicycles not only advocates a healthy and environmentally friendly lifestyle, but also facilitates people's travel and reduces the public's travel costs. The first-class bicycles that benefit and benefit the people have become a "thorn in the flesh" for some people, and they want to get rid of them quickly.

"The destruction of private bicycles" not only damages other people's property, but also causes damage to people's public travel rights. As a public means of transportation, shared bicycles can effectively solve the "last mile" travel problem; in some big cities with traffic congestion, shared bicycles allow many people to enjoy quality travel. . ***Xiangyi Bicycle provides a good user experience, and people will naturally "vote with their feet."

A few people who love to take advantage regard free bicycles as free public goods, and either take them as their own, or use them to their advantage, causing them to stage a "tragedy of the commons." Although shared bicycles have certain public welfare attributes, they are not purely public products; they are "owners" rather than "ownerless".

Under the impact of the Internet economy such as online ride-hailing and bicycle sharing, some traditional industries have been violently impacted. Accustomed to the previous profit model and interest structure, in the face of challenges and pressure, some black car and motorcycle drivers find it difficult to adapt, and put their "ban" on the private bicycles; the private bicycles are like an unwelcome invasion. They become the "culprits" who destroy some people's jobs. Once these people who think they are "being deprived of food by the free bicycles" find a reason for themselves, even if it is an excuse to deceive themselves and others, the anomalous behavior of destroying the free bicycles will be staged.

The idea that shared bicycles have squeezed out market share and compressed interest space is, in the final analysis, a product of solidified interests. For businesses, the Internet economy brings not only pressure and risks, but also room for development and benefits. If businesses fail to keep pace with the times, they will inevitably encounter a "Waterloo" in the market - it is not that bicycle sharing takes over their jobs, but the "cultural shackles" constructed by old ideas and rigid thinking that make some people's jobs worse. Lai got smaller and smaller and even lost his job. What's more, some people's jobs are originally "mud rice bowls" that do not conform to social norms.

"The train of development rushes past the spiritual platform, and the changes in reality leave the map of the soul behind." The dislocation of values ??has caused some people to close themselves off, reject competition, and lose all their enjoyment. Bicycles are considered enemies. Malicious damage to ***'s shared bicycles is suspected of being a crime. In the final analysis, it is an anomalous act that harms others but does not benefit oneself; "***'s shared bicycles are damaged" and one must pay the price for recklessness and confusion.

Question 2: Why does the ***Bicycle Repair Center say that most of the bicycles have been vandalized? On March 14, private bicycles became increasingly popular. While bringing convenience to the public, they also suffered malicious damage from some people. Recently, reporters visited and found that nearly 3,000 bicycles were damaged at a maintenance point in Chaoyang District alone. *** Enjoys bicycles, and nearly 10 repairmen repair hundreds of them every day.

However, some repairmen admitted that after the popularity of electric vehicles, many traditional car repairmen were eliminated. Before participating in repairing exclusive bicycles, they had not repaired a car for many years.

On the north side of Nanshiliju Road in Chaoyang District, I saw that nearly 300 meters of the approximately 1 kilometer long section were covered by Ofo’s small yellow cars. The black handlebars and yellow body looked very conspicuous.

These cars are parked densely on the west side of the road. From a distance, they look like a large, neatly arranged area.

There are many signs nearby saying, "Under maintenance, please do not use." In the small open space at intervals, there are nearly 10 maintenance technicians constantly changing tires, correcting the car body and other operations.

Most of these exclusive bicycles do not appear to be seriously damaged, but many of the tires feel flat. In addition, QR codes have been smeared, and locks have been changed privately, resulting in them all being damaged. cannot be put into normal operations.

For example, a maintenance technician said that normally the tires should be punctured at the bottom of the tires, but the vehicles sent for repair are basically punctured on the sides, which looks like they were vandalized with sharp objects such as awls. Since the locks of the yellow cars are relatively simple to disassemble, some cars have been vandalized and turned into unlocked cars. The locks of some cars have been changed and the QR codes have been smeared. As a result, only the person who changed the lock knows the password and other users cannot use it. .

According to the maintenance technician, in order to solve this problem, the company has added smart locks to some of the small yellow cars newly put into the market.

It is understood that the damaged vehicles that have been transported will be repaired here, and the repaired vehicles will also be transported back to the place of release.

A staff member said that the maintenance station has existed since around February this year. He personally delivers three times a day, with an average of 12 vehicles each time. He needs to deliver another batch before 6 p.m.

According to his understanding, there are nearly 20 workers like him, each of whom delivers 30 vehicles on average, and nearly 600 vehicles are delivered and repaired every day. In addition to transporting vehicles, they need to drive tricycles to search for damaged vehicles outside multiple communities and subway stations. So far, the average daily number of repairs has not decreased.

Seeing the vandalism of ***'s bicycles, many workers transporting the vehicles expressed regret, "This is a convenient means of transportation for the people. It will not be broken like this in normal use. Most of them are It was maliciously damaged.”

According to reports, most of the vehicles at the storage point were found in the Dongzhimen and Qingnian Road areas.

Question 3: How to avoid man-made damage to bicycles? As long as the interests of all parties are protected, everything will be fine!

Recently, a piece of news about "unlocking a private bicycle in 5 seconds using a loophole" has attracted attention. In fact, this is just one of the uncivilized phenomena encountered by people enjoying bicycles. In reality, the rapid development of shared bicycles also encounters "fancy" damage such as repainting and damaging QR codes. According to incomplete statistics, the number of damaged bicycles may exceed 10,000.

Is a public bicycle being vandalized? Public security follow-up is a must! It’s not that simple: First, if you are caught destroying public facilities, you will be subject to administrative penalties at the least, and criminal law intervention at the worst. However, shared bicycles are not public facilities, and their ownership is clear. If a case is not reported, no case will be filed, and there is no possibility of punishment; secondly, the operator can choose to report the case, but the value of the shared bicycles is low, and it will constitute the crime of theft. Not standard enough, reporting the crime may not be the best choice; thirdly, the reasons for man-made sabotage are extremely complex, and bicycle users are not necessarily the saboteurs. "Capturing" the person responsible is tantamount to finding a needle in a haystack. To achieve precise strikes, the cost of regulation is too high .

If the governance level is quite difficult, then it is basically impossible to hope that bicycles will be used with care. Although the behavior ultimately manifests as vandalism, the psychological triggers can be said to be all kinds of strange: some black bikers feel that bicycles are stealing business, others simply can't stand it, some may be doing it for fun, and still others are just taking advantage of it to vent their anger. For example, there was a person in Shanghai who threw three Mobikes into the Huangpu River. The reason for the person involved was that they thought the cars were unsafe due to the presence of chips. In Guangzhou, there was an example of people throwing cars into the Pearl River. The reason was that they were having fun after drinking. Others thought Taking the bicycle as his own, even putting needles on the seat... All these things are difficult to regulate.

In this regard, "quality theory" is a commonly used summary, but quality is too abstract and fails to grasp the actual issue. What’s the key? *** The issue of bike sharing model. Although it is called "private enjoyment", it is actually a rental economy, characterized by the separation of users and owners. Let’s distinguish between several situations: 1. If you are the car owner, it is difficult for you to punch or kick your car; 2. If you take a special car and the driver is watching you as the owner, it is difficult for you to do harm; 3. However, If you are just renting and using a bicycle, and the owner is not watching you at all, what reason do you have to take special care of it? It can be seen that the state of separation of bicycle property rights and responsibilities has led to many people having bad intentions towards it. .

In this case, it is just a matter of taking the right medicine, and the medicine is to put more effort into research and development and design. The example of Mobike is representative. The product should be designed to "prevent all accidents". The QR code is specially designed so that you can't scratch it; the tires are solid so you can't tie them; the design is extremely simplified and you can dismantle every part. No less; the car is extremely heavy and heavy, and you can’t move it even if you want to sell it. Let’s talk about value. The cost of the first generation of Mobike is 6,000 yuan. Do you dare to destroy the standard for filing a case like this? Of course it is! There is a case in Shanghai. A citizen felt that Mobike was “high-end” and moved home. As a result, he was sentenced. for three months.

Similarly, there are still problems with illegal driving and parking of bicycles. Many people think that they can park wherever they want and run red lights if they want. The reason is too clear - there is no need to worry about these. Be responsible for your behavior! Therefore, to solve the problems of illegal parking and driving, targeted measures are also needed. The general principle is to clearly assign the responsibility to the lessor. How to make it clear? The key lies in the platform, which records the credit status of the lessor by designing credit score rules, reporting mechanisms, etc., and punishes those who do not abide by the rules. In this way, by grasping the main framework of bicycle research and development and rule design, the bicycle damage rate will be effectively reduced.

From the above point of view, bicycle vandalism involves at least three levels: at the level of use, most people are not refined enough; at the level of governance, there is a large regulatory cost; at the level of design, it is An opportunity for saboteurs to exploit. Therefore, a trinity is needed to deal with chaos: on issues of use, clear responsibilities to users and guide the standardization of use; on issues of governance, report some representative acts of vandalism to serve as a warning to others; more importantly, in terms of R&D and design Work hard to eliminate potential problems invisible.

Question 4: How to solve the problem of *** shared bicycles being damaged? 50 points WeiZhi Technology's Baihuafen citizen credit evaluation system can automatically calculate citizens' personal credit scores based on preset models to form personal credit reports, and also supports manual evaluation functions. If Baihua points reach a certain level, the deposit for the use of exclusive bicycles can be waived, and those at the next level can get deposit discounts. ***Bicycle sharing companies can also score the credit of people who use bicycles as a supplement to personal credit scores. Connecting *** bicycle sharing to ***'s personal credit system also reduces the operating risks of *** bicycle sharing companies. People who borrow bicycles have credit records in ***'s system, which is equivalent to having *** With the guarantee, it is easier to obtain insurance compensation once the vehicle is lost or damaged. ***Bike sharing + personal credit points restrict users who use ***shared resources and reduce risks for the sponsoring company to a certain extent.

Question 5: What punishment will be faced for destroying a *** shared bicycle? Shared bicycles are the property of the operating company and a public resource serving the public. Anyone who destroys a private bicycle, whether as a joke or for malicious purposes, is suspected of intentionally damaging public or private property.

Article 49 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" stipulates: "Whoever steals, defrauds, robs, snatches, extorts or intentionally damages public or private property shall be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and may be sentenced concurrently." A fine of not more than 500 yuan; if the circumstances are serious, he will be detained for not less than 10 days but not more than 15 days, and may also be fined not more than 1,000 yuan.

As bicycles are released to major cities, bicycles are being banned. News of destruction have also occurred frequently. In February this year, a man in Fuzhou pushed a bicycle into Qinting Lake in Jin'an District, Fuzhou City. After the incident, the police intervened in the investigation and the man surrendered in Wuhan City on March 21. Two private bicycles appeared at the bottom of the East Lake near Lingbo Gate in Wuchang District.

In addition, on February 15, a drunk man named Guo from Jinan discovered the west bank of the Dongluo River while out walking his dog. Four Mobikes were parked, and in order to vent their personal anger, they threw the four Mobikes into the river. Later, Guo was detained administratively for 10 days by the police for "picking quarrels and provoking trouble."

The judge believed that this was a crime. This kind of intentional destruction of private bicycles is suspected of the crime of intentional destruction of public or private property. According to the provisions of the Criminal Law, if the amount of intentional destruction of public or private property is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, the person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years, criminal detention, or a fine; if the amount is huge, Or if there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 3 years but not more than 7 years.

According to relevant laws and regulations, if the value of public or private property intentionally destroyed reaches more than 5,000 yuan, that is, it reaches the "red line" of "large amount" and will be investigated for criminal liability for the crime of intentional destruction of property. Therefore, once the value of the private bicycle destroyed by the relevant perpetrator reaches 5,000 yuan through judicial appraisal, the perpetrator may face criminal penalties.

Question 6: What do you think of the damage to the *** bicycle? 10 points 1. User’s personal issues

Although bicycle sharing is launched by enterprises, it represents a public nature to a certain extent and is not the private property of a certain person. Property does not only belong to one person after being rented by a user, but is used by many people. In fact, for public property, many people's evil content has been released. We can often see that buses, scenic spots and other places have been maliciously damaged by people. The more common ones are carvings on scenic spots, and some people There are many similar behaviors involving people urinating and defecating in scenic spots without paying attention, and there are also many more abhorrent incidents. The situation in places such as bicycle rentals and scenic spots is relatively similar.

2. There are loopholes in management

The management loopholes are reflected in the fact that when the user returns the car, it is in the form of a magnetic card or a QR code. Only one of the subjects is audited, not the entire car. The car is inspected from start to finish, that is to say, except for the core components, even if the user removes the tire, it can still be returned.

It is impossible for bicycle-sharing companies to conduct very detailed inspections of every vehicle. Currently, their focus is on developing the number of users and user scale, so they naturally cannot spend too much effort on the audit level. Bicycles are not like cars. Maybe when a user rents a car from a car rental agency, it will be inspected when it is finally returned. As for bicycles, first of all, the price is relatively cheap, and secondly, the number of users is too large. If according to the predictions of the data agency, OFO + Mobike The launch volume exceeds 1.2 million vehicles, and 1.2 million vehicles need to be reviewed frequently and in detail, which consumes a huge amount of manpower, material resources, and financial resources. OFO and Mobike are also unable to do this.

3. Parking conflicts

At present, the parking area problem of various bicycle sharing companies has not been completely solved, and the parking of many bicycles is unclear. Some users park their bicycles indiscriminately because they do not belong to them. When other users see the "randomly parked" bicycles, they may block their own roads. Once left unattended, others will inevitably give them a thumbs up. Some bicycle "lessons" are not uncommon.

Question 7: How to solve the problem of deliberate destruction of private bicycles? Explanation If low-carbon travel is a "trend", then private bicycles must be a must-have "fashion item" for fashionable people. Taste". In the past year of 2016, bicycle sharing can be said to be a hot topic among many people. Bicycle sharing has "bloomed like a hundred flowers" across the country. All kinds of bicycles appeared on the streets overnight, attracting many people to try them. , extremely fiery.

Explanation At the same time, problems such as illegal parking, insufficient public transportation facilities, and bicycle damage have also arisen. In Shenzhen, a large number of private bicycles were deliberately damaged; in Guangzhou, bicycles were thrown into the river because they were parked illegally. Recently, reporters also went to the streets of Chengdu and found that the private bicycles in Chengdu also have similar problems. Some citizens also said that the emergence of private bicycles does not know whether it brings convenience to everyone or brings trouble to everyone. More trouble.

The bad thing about the same period (Chengdu citizen Xu Yongjun) is that the parking problem sometimes affects the beauty and image of the city.

(Chengdu Citizen Shiyin) From a management perspective, we often see that parking everywhere makes management troublesome. Regarding traffic and other aspects, there are often piles everywhere but no one is managing them.

(Chengdu citizen Liu Xiaohong) I think it’s okay. (Regulated) parking is up to us and has nothing to do with bicycles.

Explanation In the heated discussion, faced with problems such as difficulty in bicycle management and insufficient supporting facilities, relevant departments in Chengdu have also successively introduced relevant policies and measures, such as regulating parking areas and so on.

Zhang Ao, the person in charge of a certain shared bicycle, said in an interview that although there are still some problems, the emergence of the first shared bicycle has received a lot of praise. Regarding the current management and parking issues, We are also actively cooperating with relevant departments to solve the problem.

During the same period (Zhang Ao, Chengdu city manager of a certain bicycle sharing company), in fact, when we first came to Chengdu, citizens were very involved in this project, but the understanding of this project may still require further development of bicycles. In the process of development, we slowly and deeply understand that, for example, there will be some bad phenomena, but we here will also actively cooperate with ***, for example, we will regulate some parking spaces and appeal to the public. Park our bicycles correctly and take good care of them. We also have front-line personnel offline to deal with these phenomena in a timely manner. For example, if bicycles have minor problems for a long time, front-line maintenance personnel will conduct timely inspections so that citizens can get better experience.

Question 8: Why do some people want to destroy *** bicycles? Question 9: The bicycles in Chengdu were destroyed. Why do so many people destroy *** bicycles? The price of bicycles is low, and the rent is low. You can rent a car for a little money each time. If it breaks down later, you only need to return it and you can get rid of all responsibility. After all, low-quality people are everywhere

Question 10:* What to do if a shared bicycle is damaged 1. Bicycles are parked indiscriminately, vandalized and piled up. At present, the parking area problem of various shared bicycle companies has not been completely solved. The parking of many bicycles is unclear, and some users park their bicycles indiscriminately because they do not belong to their own homes. Other users will follow suit when they see such a situation. Once these bicycles interfere with others, some people will wantonly destroy them. , and then find a place to pile them up randomly. This situation is not uncommon. One is the parking of bicycle companies, and the other is the reasonable parking of users. Both of these require clear rules, but there are still loopholes. 2. The level of social public quality is too low. Although shared bicycles are released by enterprises, they are public property. To a certain extent, they represent the nature of the public and are not the private property of a certain person. , it is not that after a user rents it, it will only be used by one person, but it will be used by many people. I have encountered various ofo QR codes being blackened or scratched beyond recognition before. What's more, some people directly add a lock to turn the public bicycle into a "own" bicycle. This kind of situation can only be alleviated by improving the quality level of the public. 3. There are loopholes in corporate management. Shared bicycles rely on the Internet to continue to develop and grow, but now the management of shared bicycles is not perfect enough. This naturally leads to users daring to "safely and boldly" damage these bicycles. .