Joke Collection Website - News headlines - The title of "Anti-Gangster" was bought by the crew on the platform, but was found to be plagiarized. What is the truth?

The title of "Anti-Gangster" was bought by the crew on the platform, but was found to be plagiarized. What is the truth?

It’s not plagiarism, it’s transfer. If it's plagiarized, there's still room for quibbles, but if it's copied, it's hard to explain. I just looked at it again and found that the producer of "Anti-Gangster" bought the title from a material website. In this case, the material website stole other people's videos and sold them. I feel like the film studio's response is like blaming someone else

The title sequence is exactly the same as the material of photographer Cao Qi. This drama is a bit ironic. In fact, third parties are involved in the production of TV series and movies, including openings, endings and special effects. The title of this title is suspected of plagiarism. The main reason is that the copyright awareness is weak and it was used without authorization from the author. It will be very embarrassing after it is exposed. I hope the matter can be handled properly and wait for the third party's response. The biggest fault party is obviously the material uploader

As a material website, is there a review mechanism to check whether the uploader is the author? Or is it that anyone can upload materials and promote themselves as the original author? I don’t know what this is exactly and won’t comment on it. Although I think it is difficult to distinguish the originality of materials as a material website, it does not mean that there is no such thing at all. responsibility. The biggest fault is obviously the uploader of the material. First, you are not the author of the material. Second, you put other people's works online and sell them for money without the author's authorization, which led to a series of problems in the entire TV series production process. There are some websites that steal other people's resources

and then sell them to video producers at low prices. These websites sell materials through material packages, annual packages, monthly packages, etc., without actually obtaining the copyright of the relevant materials. The scene at the beginning of this anti-crime storm should be a certain material picture purchased from a certain material website, but the website did not actually obtain the copyright to this material picture.

Theoretically, the opening scene should have been shot separately for the show. However, the Anti-Gangster Storm was most likely limited by production funds, so the title sequence was not shot separately, and the producers could only go to the website to purchase the materials themselves. China's film and television industry is an industry where capital diversion is very, very unreasonable. Most of the production fee is taken away by the actors, another part is divided by the director and the photography, lighting and costume team, a small part is given to the screenwriting team, and a very small part is given to the post-production team. This is the current state of the film and television industry.