On the road of life, who you go with is more important than where you go.

The scenery is another scene.

It doesn't matter how important it is.

A suitable person and an unforgettable memory.

The luxury of life is nothing more than that no matter where you go or what you do, there is someone who can share joys and sorrows with you, always care about and love you. When you go down the mountain with a slant sword, you have a great chance of success. But if you choose the wrong person, it is equivalent to the traveler adding a handful of sand to his shoes. He won't go too far.

Chu and Han contended, and Liu Bang was inferior to Xiang Yu in both martial arts and art of war, but why was it he who finally achieved the hegemony? Isn't it because of the help of Sean and Han Xin?

I think friends are very important ~ one tree cannot make a forest ~ one person remembers short, two people remember long, and three heads are better than one! You are not perfect ~ you can't consider the problem comprehensively ~ if you just graduated from college ~ you have no experience and qualifications! Even if you want to start your own business! One person can never do it! But what's more important is to see what kind of people you are with again!

Personal opinion! I hope it works!

Where to go shows the ultimate goal of life, and who to walk with shows the expected partner on the road to success.

The goal is cold and the partner is warm. An ideal partner can even correct the direction of the goal.

In just a few decades, you must choose a good partner if you want to spend it happily. Unless you can stick to your beliefs and focus on your life. Then you are also great!

If you achieve your goal by hook or by crook, it will do too much damage to the outside world. If you want to get married, if you just want to get married, find someone with a completely different language and quarrel every day, will you? )

-Counterexamples: Stalin's purge, someone's "gorgeous theory", and the XX of the Korean people.

Steve ballmer, the current CEO of Microsoft, was asked: "What is the luckiest thing in your life?" At that time, he said without hesitation: "I became friends with a generation of Tianjiao Gates." The love of mathematics, science and Napoleon made these two math maniacs hit it off at Harvard. They have different personalities, but they have an amazing tacit understanding. In the words of Gates, the two are "high-frequency communication" and can accept all the information of each other. Later, Gates couldn't sit still at school and went through the formalities of dropping out of school to engage in Microsoft. At this time, he encouraged Ballmer to drop out of school for the first time to help him. Ballmer chose to remain the "head" of the Harvard football team and turned him down. After obtaining a double degree in mathematics and economics, Ballmer first chose to work for Procter & Gamble, and then Gates persuaded him to drop out of Stanford University and join Microsoft for the second time. This time Ballmer agreed. Later, they started the era of Microsoft and information revolution side by side. When we stand at the starting point of our career and start thinking about the development of life, we will inevitably face the same problems as them. Which is more important, where to go and who to go with?

Where to go. One of the most important meanings of life lies in the value orientation.

The destination is more important, because people always come and go alone, and only they can rely on themselves!

You and your girlfriend have been in love for four years. If assigned separately, you can go to the State Council. If you are with her, you should be a volunteer. What would you do?

If where to go refers to the purpose, well, I think this purpose is more important ~ Only by setting important goals in life can we achieve great goals and devote our lives to the country and the country ~ If we just live in the world, we don't even have goals or are short-sighted, wouldn't it be a trip to the world in vain?

I think where to go is very important, which is a matter of people's will and understanding, and who to go with is an additional condition. There are too many people walking with you in life and the world is so small.

Of course, the question of where to go is very important. Wouldn't it be better to work with the people you love?

How many people can clap their chests and say, "I can let go."

When Edison invented the electric light bulb, people around him didn't understand it, and even some authoritative scholars thought that the electric light bulb was unrealistic. How many power plants does a city need to make every household use electric lights?

Did Hitler start World War II because of his ambition or who was he connected with?

Rape and murder, arson, robbery, stealing a boat, if you are a traitor, regardless of your personality, but what you do is bad, will you? A person is handsome and attractive, but if you are a mistress and have fun without getting married, are you willing to stay with him for a lifetime? (If the other person is willing, you can say, "So that's what you think")

Example: Hitler's World War II and the Gang of Four. ...

Hitler's birth is a legend, and his character is very good from the beginning, which is even more attractive.

Life is sometimes like two rivers, which meet and separate. The purpose of meeting is to flow to the target faster, and the target will not change because of meeting.

(2)

Who you are with can include where you are going, which is wider than where you are going.

We can imagine where to go as walking with a longing for where to go.

There can be many kinds of peers,

So who are you going with, including where you are going.

So who to go with is more important than where to go.

I want to ask you a question: when you decide to go somewhere, why on earth do you want to go?

For example, tourism: When you choose to visit places of interest and cultural heritage, you actually choose to travel with China culture.

When you choose to enjoy strange mountains, strange water and natural scenery, you actually choose to walk with nature!

Yes, "where to go" depends on who you want to go with. "Where to go" is a subjective idea, which depends on the objective conditions of "who". The objective determines the subjective. Who you want to go with determines where you will eventually go.

The debate about the Long March in those days can be regarded as a debate about "where to go and who to go with is more important". Comrades with left-leaning erroneous ideas will attack Changsha and riot workers in central cities. They have their unshakable revolutionary goals as guidance. But they made a mistake about who to go with. . Mao decisively and rationally saw the ultimate goal, and decided to go with the interests of the Red Army soldiers, the anti-Japanese national salvation and the overwhelming majority of the people in the country: the Long March. The big debate ended with the victory of "who to walk with". Today, our country still keeps in mind the creed of "representing the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of people in China"-walk with the people!

I remember the patriotic general Ji Hongchang wrote such a banner: "Follow the right person and go the right way". Soon after, he decided to go with the Red Army and the people, and finally got out of his confusion about where to go. Did a great thing worthy of the country and the people.

Conclusion: I think the debate between "where to go" and "who to go with" is the confrontation between idealism and materialism. Just as the debate between idealism and materialism is endless, the debate on this issue will never end. I am honored that we answered this question from a materialistic point of view and confirmed our belief with this question. Thank you!

I also think it's a question of direction and method. Where to go, when to go, and who to go with are the right way. I know where to go, I have a direction, but no one is with me, or I don't pay attention to who I am with, so that I am adversely affected on my way to the finish line, knowing that the road is east, but I don't sincerely want to walk southeast. Who to go with involves the question of what kind of people to associate with. If I have a wise person and a good friend to accompany me, in fact, I have a very clear direction in the process of moving forward with them, and there is no problem of seeking a new direction. Therefore, it is more important to pay attention to friends and peers.

Thank you, Madam President. Good afternoon. I don't know if you have such an experience, that is to say, as long as you are a tourist attraction you like, you will walk with difficulties and obstacles in the process of going to it, so as to get spiritual pleasure and satisfaction. This is exactly my view today. Where to go is more important than who to go with.

First of all, what does it mean to go? Where to go refers not only to the goal, but also to the subject's goal and the belief born to achieve it. Where to go is the root of people's actions. Those people or groups who drift aimlessly are not included in today's debate.

Then who should I go with and how should I understand it? Broadly speaking, companion refers to all objective existence outside the subject that affects the realization of goals. Similarly, we judge whether a series of objective beings walk with the subject, that is, whether they act on the same goal. Therefore, where to go and who to walk with are accompanied in this debate, and there is no time difference. Please note that we do not and will not deny the importance and universality of our peers, but we should let our opponents know that it is more important to go there than to go with whom. On what basis do we make this judgment? We can't leave the subject to talk about who is more important, and who is going there only has practical significance if it affects the development of the subject movement, so the criterion for us to judge who is more important is to see who plays a decisive role in the nature and direction of the development of the subject movement.

In 1, where to go plays a decisive role in the development of discipline movement. The China Revolution took the socialist road rather than the capitalist road, which determined the nature of China society today. China's educational goal has changed from the simple pursuit of enrollment rate to the all-round development of morality, intelligence and physique, which determines the current trend of advocating quality education. The main goal may not be static, but as long as other laws of government and social development are in line with the fundamental interests of the people, the whole society will develop in a better direction. Of the two, who walks with you plays a decisive role in the development of the subject movement, which is external and influential. Although the influence of peers may be great, it cannot determine the nature and direction of the development of discipline movement. Just like the air we breathe every day, there is 78% nitrogen in the air, but only 2 1% oxygen. However, as we all know, it is not nitrogen that determines the nature of the air that supports people to breathe. Similarly, the goal of determining the nature and direction of the development of physical education is more important than the influence of peers.

"One World, One Dream" Only when the world moves in the direction of peace and development can mankind achieve harmonious development.

In a word, we think where to go is more important than who to go with.

Positive four debates (Chen Cheng):

Thank you, Chairman. Hello. I am glad that another debater has been "where to go" and "walking with each other" for so long, offering a wonderful debate for everyone.

On behalf of us, please allow me to point out several mistakes made by another debater in the debate just now: 1, that is, the so-called special case of going alone with a goal and who to go with without a goal, is outside the scope of today's debate. Another debater deliberately expanded the external factor of peer's role in the development of the discipline, while ignoring the internal factor of the decisive role of goals and beliefs in the development of the discipline, which is incorrect. 2. It is inappropriate to argue today's debate by deciding who is going there and who is going there, because the relationship between the two cannot be used to argue the relationship between the three. What is more important is to judge who is more important than the two, which plays a decisive role in the development of the discipline. It is also wrong for the debater to compare the importance of two factors with the importance of a single factor. Next, I will reiterate and summarize our views on our behalf:

First of all, it is necessary to clarify the profound connotation of where to go and who to walk with. Where to go refers to the belief that the subject's goal is extremely realized and adhered to. Who to walk with refers to all objective existence that acts on the realization of the goal. In addition, it is more important to clearly determine where to go and who to go with. The standard lies in who plays a decisive role in the development of the discipline, and where the discipline goes is a necessary condition for the development of the discipline, which determines the direction and nature of the development of the discipline. Who to go with can only promote or hinder the development of subject sports and affect the speed of development. These two points are two important and clear premises of this debate.

Bacon said that a lame man who never gets lost is better than a man who walks like a fly and gets lost. "No matter how their peers push or hinder them, they can't make a decision." World War II was Hitler, no matter how brilliant his record was and how strong his will alliance was. However, because their goal is wrong, it determines their fate of being judged by history. People's life is constantly faced with the judgment and discrimination of goals. If he stands at the focus of life and can smile at his own life, it must be that he keeps choosing the right goal to make this smile possible. Luo. Browning once said, "Ambition is the Big Dipper in the dark." A clear goal is like a lighthouse in the vast sea, guiding us forward. If I don't even know where to go, it's like a boat without a rudder and a horse without a title. Even with skilled sailors and Bole, we will wander and roam freely, but what is the final outcome? If we say how far the road can go, not how long the route is, but who you travel with, then what's the point of further travel without a destination? Only by setting a goal can we better guide our behavior and let us determine who will go with us on all the roads to Rome. There's still a long way to go, Xiu Yuan. I will go up, down, left, right, east, west, north and south, but time cannot be kept, so life must be constructive and have clear goals. Otherwise, such a long road of life will make Jiang Lang exhausted and at a loss. Do we have the motivation and motivation to realize the value of life? Therefore, the old saying goes: "If the ambition is not true, the heart is not hot, the heart is not hot, and the morality is not good." Therefore, a clear goal is a powerful driving force for us to approach, so that we can pursue success with full energy.

Indeed, who we go with may affect our mood when we go there and the atmosphere on the road, but you are an independent person, and you can completely eliminate or reduce this negative influence by yourself. Since who to go with means a small factor that can affect our mood, Wang Jingwei can say, "I am a patriot, but my companion has slightly influenced the atmosphere in China."

Obviously, where to go is more important than who to go with. Finally, we end with a couplet: "Where there is a will, there is a way, and cross the rubicon. One hundred and twenty Qin returned to Chu, and those who worked hard lived up to it. Three thousand armour can swallow Wu. Let's be clear about our life goals, hold on to Yun Fan and rush to the ocean of life. thank you

Opposing party: Who is more important to walk with?

Argument against the other side (Yang Shanshan):

Good chairman, good judges, good everyone!

I admire the eloquence of another debater. In the past few days, we have discussed which is more important, "who to go with" or "where to go". We define "who to walk with" as partners, tools and even opportunities in the process of progress, which is an objective environment, while understanding "where to go" as a goal is a subjective personal will. Therefore, we believe that although it is very important to go there, who to go with has a greater impact on a person's life path and is naturally more important. 1, the objective environment affects the formation and development of subjective will. Subjective will is not innate, but gradually changes and develops under the influence of objective environment. As we all know, anyone is born in a state of zero ideology, let alone subjective will. Even his independent personal consciousness is influenced by his parents and relatives around him. The growth course of the great scientist Einstein gave us a good example. When he was a child, other children were playing games outside, while he was concentrating on piling wood. His parents observed that he was willing to think, so they bought him many building blocks, books and so on. His parents correctly guided him to think positively. It is precisely because of this correct guidance that love is true.