What do you think of Hainan Areca Association's announcement in response to the ban on the sale of Hunan Areca catechu and Hainan Areca catechu? What is the difference?

In fact, for the announcement issued by Hainan Betel nut Association, we can find that this is just an excuse to sell betel nuts. Even if Hunan areca nut is different from Hainan areca nut, this product will eventually withdraw from the market.

1. Hainan betel nut association issued an announcement in response to the ban on the sale of betel nuts in Hunan and Hainan.

After Hunan betel nut was completely banned in Yiwu, many cities joined the ban. More importantly, in order to avoid this bad risk, Hainan Areca Association made an announcement to the outside world, and explained that there is an essential difference between Hunan Areca and Hainan Areca. Areca catechu in Hainan is mainly a product planted by farmers, while Areca catechu in Hunan is a deep-processed product. At present, Hainan has been promoting the research and development of corresponding products, and finally a kind of chewing gum with low alkalinity can be developed, which can greatly reduce the harm to the oral cavity.

Second, in fact, this is just an excuse to sell betel nuts.

In fact, this is just an excuse to sell betel nuts. At present, Hainan Areca nut Association regards its areca nut products as crops, and at the same time emphasizes the planting attributes, that is, from the perspective of farmers' planting income. This view is irrefutable in a sense, but in fact, we can't see the corresponding non-destructive products produced by the association, which still shows that this is just an excuse to steal the concept at present, and there is no need to clarify the specific concept if we want to sell betel nut, because everyone knows it.

Third, it is necessary for betel nut to withdraw from the market: the protection of Hainan betel nut association is useless.

In fact, no matter what Hainan Areca nut Association says at present, it is natural that Areca nut will gradually withdraw from the market, and it will not be abandoned because an association protects calves or some ridiculous reasons. At present, the difference is only a conceptual difference. In fact, the harm to personal health still exists. Whether it is deep-processed products or green betel nuts, it is inevitable to damage the individual's oral cavity, so don't steal the concept in the end.