Joke Collection Website - News headlines - Baoji epidemic situation, are there subsidies for volunteers?

Baoji epidemic situation, are there subsidies for volunteers?

There may not be a subsidy.

1. Volunteer and dedication.

During the epidemic, many dedicated friends were not afraid of danger, had the courage to be on the front line, participated in epidemic prevention and control work, and volunteered to become anti-epidemic volunteers.

It is precisely because of the efforts of many volunteers who do not care about their own safety that hundreds of millions of people isolated at home have the guarantee of daily necessities, the guarantee of social order and stability, and the virus. Guarantee of prevention and control.

When the volunteers participated in the prevention and control work, they did not think about the so-called subsidy. What's more, the subsidy is not much, and they are really giving.

02, volunteers should be given certain subsidies.

During the epidemic, it is also difficult for volunteers to do their jobs due to inconvenient transportation, lack of manpower, etc. Some volunteers are even spending their own money to do charity.

Contributing both effort and money is actually not the original intention of volunteers, and we don’t want to see volunteers dedicating so much to people and things that have nothing to do with them.

Therefore, if volunteers are organized in units or places to fight the epidemic, I think they should be given corresponding subsidies. The national and local governments have also previously issued documents stating that front-line anti-epidemic volunteers should be provided with subsidies, with specific amounts varying.

03. Don’t regard subsidies as “Tang Monk Meat”.

There has been news before that the subsidies that should have been given to front-line anti-epidemic volunteers have changed. Everyone wants to take a bite of the "anti-epidemic subsidy". What is even more annoying is that there are actually leaders The subsidy received is much higher than that of frontline volunteers, which is simply unreasonable.

Suffering from scarcity and inequality must not be applied to this situation.

The subsidies given to volunteers should be reasonably distributed according to the degree of risk and labor intensity, and should be fair and equitable so that those who contribute do not suffer.

In summary, volunteers who participate in the anti-epidemic period during the epidemic should receive subsidies, but the amount must be determined based on the specific conditions of the unit or locality. There is no one-size-fits-all standard.