Those who don't study are bosses, while those who study are part-time workers. What's the use of reading?

People who don't study seldom become bosses, while those who study mostly become bosses and officials. Absolutely not. Reading more books is better and more useful than reading less. It's not useless if you don't study.

A: I have tasted the sweetness of reading.

1. In that era of "the more knowledge, the more reactionary", because my father was an elite of Jiaotong University, he paraded the streets with seven senior intellectuals and suffered all kinds of insults. ...

2, underage when educated youth:

Teaching and educating people during the day,

Working in the fields after school,

Barefoot doctor at night,

Study hard at night.

3. For eleven years, I have been groping day and night and persevering. ...

Since the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Party, it has finally ushered in a sunny spring.

Do you have such people around you? He was naughty when he was studying, and he was often criticized by the teacher for staying in school. The man who has been at the bottom of the class for a long time has become a famous boss after leaving the society for a few years, driving a luxury car and living in a big house. And those "top students" still work in various enterprises, with middle-level mixed well and grassroots mixed badly.

Do you remember the week when it was impossible to work at the same time? Now he has become the co-founder of an electric car.

Female college students in a CCTV program stayed at home 10 years after graduation. She said in the program, "You broke my wings, but you blame me for not flying." I was deeply touched. The above example may be special, but this phenomenon is becoming more and more common. What is the reason?

I think the answer is education! This kind of education is divided into school education and family education. Let's start with school education. This is the main place to learn professional knowledge. A large part of our working ability comes from here, except for manual labor. But out of society, we find that most of the middle schools in the school are empty, and the knowledge eliminated is basically my amateur ability learned by playing computer. This ability can also be replaced by another person at will. However, the domestic education method is still based on the tactics of asking questions, and it is to cultivate "topic tyrants" instead of outstanding students who think independently and divergent. When you come out to work, there are no such platitudes to solve, but there are many difficult problems, and no one knows the answers. At this time, excellent students will be at a loss, as if they have entered a new field and slowly explored. And those who have been learning badly, they don't stick to the rules and don't take what the teacher said as the Bible. They will solve the problem in their own way. Outside the society, they are faced with their long-standing lifestyle and attitude towards life and familiar fields, so these people can feel more like a duck to water.

Family education is equally important, but this part is more about the soul. For example, a 33-year-old female college student has been suppressed by her family for a long time, and she has no self-confidence and social obstacles, which is a common problem in many families. As a person who has stayed at home for three years, I can understand this woman's mentality. She is just stubborn and self-respecting, and all she is waiting for is an apology from her family. If her family had apologized to her earlier, she wouldn't have eaten for ten years. Unfortunately, her family always thought they were right.

You broke my wings, but you blame me for not flying. I hope to alert some educators and families. If you want children to fly, please protect their wings first. This wing is self-confidence. Let children dare to ask questions, dare to do what they like, and guide patiently. Everyone is unique and can't ask for a standard. Just like the stars in the sky, each one has a different luminosity and size. But it constitutes a vast universe.

There was a boy in Grade Two who read the article "Reading is useless" and suddenly became particularly tired of learning. One day when I came home from school, I told my mother that I didn't want to go to school, wanted to go out to work, and wanted to start my own business. I also told my mother a lot of reasons and listed many entrepreneurs and bosses who graduated from primary school.

Mother didn't get angry. She knew that her son's rebellious period had come. She said to her son, before you make a decision, I hope you can calm down and listen to a story from your mother.

This is a new version of "Little Horse Crossing the River", which is different from what you heard before:

There was a pony who wanted to cross the river, but he didn't know the depth of the river and wanted to ask someone else. Then it met a calf and asked the calf, "Can this river cross?" The calf said, "Yes, the calf walked from one side of the river to the other." The pony thinks, he has four legs, and I have four legs, too. He has no wings, and I have no wings. He can pass, so can I.

So the pony boldly went to the river. Because the river was too deep, he took the pony away. The pony was swept away by the river because the calf was taller than him, but the pony only saw that everyone had four legs and no wings, but he didn't see that the calf was taller than himself.

A lot of people do. He only saw the similarities between himself and others, but did not see the differences between himself and others. You only saw others not going to school, but you didn't see what others did. For example, Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, many people know that he didn't go to college, but they don't know that Bill Gates/Kloc was admitted to Harvard University at the age of 0/8 and dropped out of Harvard one year later.

Since Bill Gates can be admitted to Harvard University, it shows that his learning ability has surpassed most people, but many people have not seen it. Besides, Bill Gates' parents are rich and have a good eye. He dropped out of school and chose to start a business because he just seized a wave of opportunities and the opportunity of the times.

If you think you are like Bill Gates, we both have two arms and two legs, we both graduated from high school, we all like computer programming, and then we rush out to start a business, which can only be cannon fodder.

Someone used a joke to ridicule the futility of reading: I bought a sack of books with a sack of money, and finally sold a sack of books, but I couldn't afford a sack.

However, is there really a necessary connection between reading and making money? Is studying hard in college to make money? Don't you have to go to school if you don't make money? If you just want to make money, there are better ways than reading!

In my opinion, the theory of reading uselessness is only a one-sided and short-sighted view. It only believes that a person's ability at a certain moment does not match his resources, or that a diploma does not equal his status and resources.

It may have been reasonable to discuss the futility of going to school 30 years ago, but it is not appropriate to discuss it now. It used to be because people didn't have the conditions to go to school, but now it's different. What we need now is knowledge-based talents. Only by mastering high technology can we make ourselves strong.

A diploma is more than just a piece of paper. Although many people now say that it depends on the ability to work, you will be required to have a bachelor's degree and a graduate degree when recruiting for the Fortune 500 companies. If they have the same academic qualifications, they will probably hire students who graduated from prestigious schools first, and then consider students who graduated from ordinary universities.

So I summed up a sentence: education is not everything, but without it, you can't do anything!

Why can some people with low academic qualifications be bosses, while those with high academic qualifications are working? Because of these three points

When we try to gain a foothold in this society, there are actually many choices. These choices are a direction and path that I have given myself after careful consideration. When you want to go in this direction, you will find that your mentality is gradually changing.

This is why everyone's life stages and roads are different, and these are definitely inseparable from their own psychological processes. Of course, sometimes, many people think that some sentences are reasonable, and when they do things themselves, they always contain these truths in these things.

In this regard, today we will talk about why some people with low academic qualifications can be bosses, while those with high academic qualifications are working. Because of these three points. If you don't know, you can watch it several times.

1, do you have an economic mind

First of all, the first point is to see if you have an economic mind. We all think reading is very useful, at least when you choose a job, many companies really value academic qualifications.

So many people try their best to get a high degree in order to enter a big company, so that they can have more opportunities than others in the interview. When they come up with that beautiful resume, some people can make the interviewer shine.

But these are all considered on the basis of working for others. But in the act of being a boss, you don't really need to have a high degree. It's important to see if you have an economic mind.

After all, you must have economic awareness in doing business. You need to know what you are doing, what your economic expenditure and operation are like. How to sell a commodity and how to do it are all things that a boss needs to consider. And this really has nothing to do with education. So, even if you have a low education, you can still be a boss.

2. Knowledge is useful for work, but it is not easy to manage.

Secondly, knowledge is useful for work experience, but it is not easy to manage. As a boss, it is also important to have some management experience at first. When it comes to highly educated people, will management be strong?

Actually, not necessarily. Some people can provide technical support, but if you ask him to take care of his employees, you'd better give it to some professionals.

Of course, if you want to be a boss, you definitely need some management experience. On the one hand, people with a certain social foundation, low academic qualifications and work experience will naturally be more comfortable. For some highly educated people, there are still some advantages.

3. Social experience

Another point is social experience. As far as people with low academic qualifications are concerned, their work experience is definitely much richer than those with high academic qualifications. Because they are at the bottom, they will naturally know the prices of many markets. In the process of contacting others, they can also know their own economic situation and how to deal with people from their personalities.

It is very important for a boss to accumulate experience, because if you want to be a successful boss, you must read and understand a lot of things in the market, otherwise the word "starting from scratch" will not appear.

Then after acquiring these necessary knowledge, plus the accumulated funds and contacts, you will naturally become a more successful boss.

Conclusion: Of course, it does not mean that people with high academic qualifications are not bosses. It just means that no matter your education level, there will be a way out. It depends on how far you have learned.

In life, I often hear people say, "Reading has an egg. You can see who never studies and earns a lot of money as a boss. " So, is reading useful? In today's society, should children be guided to read more books? This article gives a different answer, and you may be inspired after reading it.

1

Because I work in manufacturing, I often meet all kinds of people. There are gangsters, officials, manufacturing bosses, factory employees and small white-collar workers in the office. Their income is not high, ranging from 3000 to 7000 a month, but this level is not low in China.

Needless to say, since China opened the WTO in 2000, foreign trade has faced unprecedented opportunities. With a net worth of less than 10 million, I am embarrassed to say that I have done foreign trade.

Here, from the boss to the employees, from the outside to the guests, from the inside to the acquaintances, you can always feel an anti-intellectual tendency.

Sometimes when chatting, I say, "Hey, reading is not that useful. Look at you. " Then I stopped talking, meaning, "You read so many books, didn't you end up working with your boss?"

A colleague wants to speculate in stocks, recommend him to read some books and return them to me intact. Compared with these, they prefer to watch the news, watch the explosive news that "anonymous made 6 million in this bull market", discuss the K-line form and look for inside information.

Others want to start a business and start a factory, but no one wants to calm down, save their strength, read some books and learn something.

They often give me the answer: "I don't think reading is that important, you need it after reading!" " What I lack now is experience, which I really, really need. You're like my master. You can't type a word, and you're criss-crossing, but you're very experienced ... "

Here, people like to talk about wealth, lament the past, gather in gossip and talk about celebrity events in Kan Kan.

But no one ever wants to know the theory and reasons behind these events, and no one will calm down and take a book to study it slowly.

2

Since the reform and opening up in 1980s, disastrous changes have taken place in China, which have had a far-reaching impact on China's economy. In this context, countless opportunities have been born and tens of thousands of rich people have been born.

Some people get rich without knowing how they got rich. In the face of wealth, people tend to be extremely inflated, overemphasizing their own abilities and ignoring the role of objective factors.

Especially in our real society, the reasons are often derived from the results. When a person succeeds, you always feel that everything he says is right.

Therefore, these phenomena give people an illusion that it is true that you can earn money and have the ability to study.

What is the ability? God knows. Some people think it's connections, some people understand it as "resources", and some people understand it as power.

However, in my opinion, these interpretations don't point to the essence of the problem at all-all the rich people who didn't rely on brain power and technical content had a premise: because of the asymmetry of information.

What is information asymmetry? Let me give you an example:

Give another example:

Do these need to be read? No need.

In the age of information occlusion, you don't need technology, knowledge reserve or even capital. You only need to be brave enough to seize the opportunity, and you may become rich.

However, the situation has changed now for a simple reason: with the Internet.

When the Internet was born, information began to become fully circulated. In the case of complete information circulation, opportunism is relatively rare-you can buy government bonds online, with transparent prices, no regional price difference and no arbitrage space; Doing foreign trade, I finally searched on EBAY, and the price was clear at a glance. You used to have the right to bully others, but now I video you online with my mobile phone, and you are in danger of being laid off.

So, now we find it more and more difficult to make money. That's the point-your chances of profiting from opportunities are getting smaller and smaller, and information is fully circulated. What you can do is for someone else to buy a sample from your online shop and copy it.

Finally, more and more people make the same products as you, and the price is getting lower and lower until it is unprofitable.

In an information-blocked environment, you can get rich overnight without studying. In an environment where information flows fully, without these opportunities to get rich, what can you rely on? Relying on real skills, if there is an opportunity, it is also an accurate judgment of future trends.

I wonder what role reading can play in this industrial upgrading. I only know that without reading and knowledge, relying on experience, connections, relationships, money and upside down will easily be eliminated in this industrial upgrading.

three

The advantage of books is that you can't meet so many excellent people around you, because some people who wrote books are dead, and only ideas are handed down.

However, books give you a way to approach them.

Our experience in real life is often one-sided and fragmentary. You may suddenly realize one or two precious truths because of one or two experiences, but soon, as many times before, you will be excited for a day or two and soon forget what you should have done before.

The reason is that they are just scattered in your mind and have not become a complete knowledge system, supporting you and forming your beliefs.

Books give you systematic knowledge classification and combing. They connect all the points into a surface and make systematic induction.

Books bring us more ways to sort out problems and ways of thinking, which cannot be replaced by experience.

Not only that, books can also supplement people's experience-one can't experience multiple lives. However, books can. Looking at history and biographies, we can see a colorful life, thus summing up the general laws.

The biggest problem caused by not reading is blindly believing in empiricism and thinking that experience can be supreme. Think about it, what is more precious than my personal experience? Only what I have experienced personally suits me. Everything in the book is dead, but my experience is alive. Here's the thing:

His sentence itself is actually a logical error, separating experience from theory and making extreme assumptions. In fact, in real life, there are no inexperienced people. As long as you are alive, you will experience, experience, and experience. Therefore, there are no people who only read books without experience, but there are people who only read experience without reading books, and there are quite a few.

1. Low reading ability.

This is a circle of friends for many of us. These people even regard chicken soup as the essence of human thought. You can't remind him yet, lest he get angry.

2. Speech and emotion are dominant, and there is no logic.

3. Always rely on feelings and don't believe in science.

For example, our master Wang Lin is so angry. A while ago, I also learned that some so-called energy masters really believe. When people describe the magic of these people to me, they are really lifelike.

People who don't like learning are usually not open-minded.

So it's hard to realize your own shortcomings, so don't expect them to correct their mistakes or anything, just do what you want. They thought it was fate, but in fact many reasons were caused by themselves.

Read more books, and if nothing else, there will be less unnecessary disputes and noise in this society.

According to the big data of the Ninth National Reading Survey organized by China Press and Publication Research Institute, in 20 1 1 year, the per capita reading in China was only 4.77, far lower than that of Koreans 1 1, French 20, Japanese 40, not to mention Jews 64. China is one of the countries with the least reading per capita.

Whether the survey data is accurate or not, we can draw a general conclusion: it is an indisputable fact that the reading rate in developed countries is much higher than that in China.

Now many students get together and basically don't talk about movies, music or books. Have you bought a house? Have you bought a car? How old are the children? After discussing these problems, the party almost broke up.

What we are doing now is not a question of whether reading is useful at all, but whether we are reading. Many people who hold the theory of "reading is useless" don't read books themselves, or they don't understand at all after reading them.

You don't read much, so it's funny to talk about "whether reading is useful or not". In fact, many people don't know that they don't study, but they are actually learning in another form:

For example, a boss spent thousands of dollars after listening to a "successful speech" and came to me cheerfully and said, "Hey, do you know? I really gained a lot from listening to the teacher's speech last night. There are many innovations in his views. For example, he said that many people in our world succeed because of persistence. One day, a friend of his started to learn golf from 0. His friend told the teacher that although he is a novice, as long as he keeps swinging 1000 times, he is an expert. He swings 1000 times and is a master ... "

Before she finished, I understood that the "story of my friend" told by a successful lecturer was actually a modified version of the 10,000-hour theory. The source of this theory comes from the aliens in Gladwell-in fact, they are not lazy, impetuous and can't stand loneliness. They prefer to sit under the stage with a group of people and listen to others telling stories to themselves, even if they spend a little money.

When a person is lazy, he usually makes a series of reasonable explanations for his behavior, such as "reading is useless"

So I think it will be better for these people to discuss the topic of "whether reading is useful or not" after reading some books.

Reading is still useful. Can better work for the boss.

Reading is useful, but not dead reading. It is a minority that people who don't study become bosses. What if this boss also studies? Study hard, reading is a shortcut, and you should use it in your life. It's no use reading dead books

There must be more people reading than those who don't. Apart from becoming a boss without reading, Faith's father left him a huge fortune, and few people were lucky enough to meet a gold mine and make a fortune.

Culture is not high, I don't know anything. The enlightenment of human life.