If I only have 4 days of vacation and want to go see the sea, which one is more cost-effective, Boracay Island in the Philippines or Koh Samui in Thailand? Can you tell me the specific reasons?

For a 4-day holiday, compared with Boracay Island and Koh Samui, Boracay Island is more cost-effective.

There are two main reasons

The price of Boracay Island is much cheaper than that of Koh Samui. Most of the guests on Samui Island are European and American, and various activities and hotel charges are towards the level of developed countries. Boracay Island has mostly Chinese and Korean tourists, and various activities and hotel charges are basically famous for being cheap. While the two islands have similar levels of accommodation, food, drinks and entertainment, Long Beach is much cheaper.

If you look at the sea, the sea view of Long Beach is far better than that of Koh Samui.

The quality of water activities such as snorkeling in Long Beach is also higher than that in Koh Samui. The main disadvantage of Long Beach is that there is only one high-end hotel, Shangri-La, and the density of tourists is too high. If you want a better experience, you can consider staying in Shangri-La or WC, the hotel in the bay of Nami, S1.2.3 are all just a matter of chance.

Samui’s words are not out of the question, but according to your statement, the price-performance ratio of seeing the sea for 4 days is incomparable between these two islands:)

If you have more questions, please ask. Yes, I will add more