The Ministry of Education clearly gives subsidies to after-school service teachers. What is the standard of subsidies?

The statement issued by the Ministry of Education is that teachers who serve after class will be given corresponding subsidies.

This corresponding subsidy is an "elastic" word, which does not specify specific standards, or it can be considered that there is no unified standard. Guess there should be a corresponding reward mechanism, or it should be adapted to local conditions, and the standards vary from place to place. Let's talk about this after-school service

is not the so-called advanced teaching or paid service. After all, if it is, it will conflict with the "double reduction policy". Teachers are subsidized by the government or schools in order to enrich students' after-school activities.

It includes: 1. Answering questions for students. 2. Carry out after-school sports and other activities.

After-class tutoring not only teaches teachers, but also employs retired teachers to participate, which should be a welfare policy for teachers. Benefits of after-school service

As a parent, I personally agree with this after-school service, especially after-school counseling. We also came from the student days. At that time, the teacher said that if you have any questions after class, you can ask me at any time. I believe that many students with poor grades are afraid to ask. The subconscious always feels that this is a welfare for top students. Moreover, what teachers say is actually a personal behavior. For example, some teachers don't say anything.

Now it is clearly stipulated that the school will certainly implement it accordingly. In such an atmosphere, even students with poor learning have the courage to ask their teachers. This is good for students or parents.

It is undoubtedly the most ideal if teachers can tailor guidance to each student and actively encourage students to ask questions. Talk about my personal opinion

In fact, many in-service or retired teachers will provide some off-campus training. Teachers have to live, earn more income, and retired teachers can start a second career in training institutions, which seems understandable.

At present, the policy does not allow it, but the state will not care about the life or death of teachers, so this policy can be regarded as providing an income for in-service teachers and retired teachers in disguise, and the state still considers the problem comprehensively.

what do you think of this problem? Welcome to leave a message to discuss.