What is more regrettable, missing or not getting it?

What is more regrettable, missing or not getting it? I think it is more regrettable to miss than not to have it.

If you don't get it, you will regret it for a while, and if you get it, you will always regret it.

What you have can only be lost, and what you can't get can't be lost.

It's a pity to lose because you got and understood, but you didn't get the desired ending.

Lost: once owned. Can't get it: never.

The process of losing more than we can't get is called having, because we have had too many good memories, so it's really too painful to lose again and it's hard to let go.

Losing it, what once belonged to you is gone now, and it must be more regrettable.

If you can't get it, it doesn't belong to you, and it's easy to forget. What's more, since I've seen the flowers bloom, why should I care whose house they fall on?

Lost: once owned. Can't get it: never.

The process of losing more than we can't get is called having, because we have had too many good memories, so it's really too painful to lose again and it's hard to let go.

Losing it, what once belonged to you is gone now, and it must be more regrettable.

If you can't get it, it doesn't belong to you, and it's easy to forget. What's more, since I've seen the flowers bloom, why should I care whose house they fall on?

I think they will both regret it. If you lose it, you cannot keep it. If you can't get it, you will lose it. Both of them are contrary to their own subjective consciousness, so it is a pity.

Just like one thing: I'm sorry you failed or didn't. It would be a pity if you didn't get it. You haven't touched or felt it. Loss is that you have a chance to have it, but it doesn't last long.

In fact, we regret our way of life. Gains and losses seem to be our own choices, but they are already doomed. Whether it is lost or not, it is a part of cause and effect. Cause and effect cannot be avoided and must be borne. This cannot be taken lightly.

Zazie Hoko