What should real feminism look like?

Here's a feminist school I advocate.

I advocate non-social existentialism feminism.

non-social attainment is existentialism.

Existentialist feminism emphasizes the transcendence of the so-called "immanence" of women, trying to get rid of the state of "the other" and "otherness", so as to establish women's subjective consciousness, make women a free subject and realize their own value.

when one person's value is not proved by bullying another person, this is existentialism.

representative figures of existentialist feminism: Beauvoir

Social activists can't see themselves, and they must confirm their happiness through the misfortunes of others. From the envy of others, I dare to believe that I am doing well.

They can't even confirm that they are alive without suppressing others and enjoying others' worship.

how sad and ridiculous!

Fei Sheda doesn't need to go to so much trouble, because she has her own inner world, and it is not an isolated inner world, it is connected with the whole human being, and it is connected with the past and future of human beings. She seems to be alone, but in fact she is extremely rich inside.

Existentialism is to realize that contrast is not the essence of human beings.

The misfortunes of others are not your happiness. If you still admit that you are a member of mankind, the misfortunes of others are our own misfortunes.

how many people can see this floor and think of it?

In addition to the clarification of the above concepts, throw away the moral factors and talk about why you choose non-social existentialist feminism.

Many sisters say that women want to seize power.

it's good. how to take it away?

this is an abstract concept. It's not like we're going to rob the jade seal!

what is the essence of power? Is the number of supporters.

So, dreaming of seizing power overnight is a three-year-old playing house.

Some sisters said that women's rights should also be achieved, and magic should be defeated.

Under the rule that men are favored by men, you should use the same routine as men to defeat men. I'm sorry, in mathematics, it's like because of a> b，b> C, so c> a。 Such an obvious mistake.

The biggest dilemma of women's rights is not the direct oppression of men, but that women, as victims, are also the most powerful thugs of men's rights, taking the place of men to conduct the most direct discipline and supervision on women, the most typical of which is that mothers treat their daughters.

that is, female competition.

those who flatter men must compete for women!

The first step to women's rights is not to directly confront male chauvinism, but to disintegrate female competition.

in a patriarchal society, men are superior and women are inferior.

what women's rights want to achieve is equality.

Because the slave can't afford the price of freedom, she not only looks for the slave owner, but also hates other slaves who are more beautiful than her. This is female competition and slave competition.

Therefore, appearance humiliation and slut humiliation are very popular among women. This is the internal differentiation force that women's rights face.

to "seize power", we must first purge the internal forces. The internal division is still at this point, where will there be the support of external forces to seize power, where to start?

The biggest dilemma of women's rights is that in the patriarchal society, the short-term interests and long-term interests of men are unified; The short-term interests and long-term interests of women are separated.

The reason why they are separated is that women have become deeply servile, so her short-term interest is to find a good slave owner, and she is afraid that other slaves will take away her slave owner.

If women are willing to be individuals, short-term interests and long-term interests will be unified.

Get rid of women's servility, make them spiritually independent, become a non-socialist, feel their own value without relying on the gaze and selection of slave owners, and become a real existentialist.

If women can't learn to be a person, look at the problem from a long-term perspective, only care about the immediate interests of slaves, and supervise and discipline each other, women's rights will never be realized!

Aside from moral factors and human dignity, women's rights are "unworthy" to achieve their goals!

The feminist rights of Sheda will only further increase the internal division of women and get farther and farther away from the goal of feminist rights.

Therefore, from this perspective, it is necessary for women's rights to "punish" the "traitors" of social and slave competitions. That is to say, we resolutely do not support wife rights and social women's rights.

If women's rights support wife rights, it will turn most women into slaves of men. Good wife rights, that is, marriage that protects the weak, will turn all women into the weak. Isn't slavery that protects slaves slavery?

as long as there are slaves, there will be slave competition, that is, social development.

conversely, as long as the society reaches, slaves and slave owners will inevitably be produced.

I can never understand the pleasure of those who are jealous, competitive, enslaved and compared. Although I know their psychological mechanism, I really can't agree with their bad taste.

I want to stop this.

The women's rights I want may not be realized in the limited history of mankind, let alone in my own life. It doesn't matter. As an INTP, I only know that my logical deduction is correct and my emotion is just, which is enough. This is my greatest pleasure.

an ideal can never be realized in one's own life, but what can be realized in one's short life is called a plan.

women's rights are my ideal, not my plan.

It has been authorized by the author, and the copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author for any form of reprinting.

Author: nonlinear regression (from Douban)