What is a case against organizational censorship?

The behavior of confronting organizational review can occur after the organizational decision review, or after the disciplinary action is implemented and before the organizational decision review. For example, after accepting money from others, the auditee signed a false loan agreement with the sender in case he might be investigated by the organization in the future. This behavior also belongs to the anti-organization review.

according to article 56 of the "regulations on disciplinary action of China * * * production party"

anyone who opposes organizational review and commits one of the following acts shall be given a warning or a serious warning; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be dismissed from his post within the party or be placed on probation; If the circumstances are serious, the punishment of expulsion from the Party shall be given: < P > (1) Collusion or forgery, destruction, transfer or concealment of evidence;

(2) preventing others from exposing and reporting or providing evidential materials;

(3) shielding co-defendants;

(4) providing false information to the organization to cover up the facts;

(5) there are other acts against organizational censorship.

article 57 whoever organizes or participates in an assembly, procession or demonstration on the basic theory, basic line, basic strategy or major principles and policies of the opposition party, or organizes lectures, forums, reports and symposiums, if the basic theory, basic line, basic strategy or major principles and policies of the opposition party have serious adverse effects, the planners, organizers and key members shall be expelled from the party.

Give a warning or severe warning to other participants or those who support the above activities by providing information, materials, property, venues, etc., if the circumstances are minor; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be dismissed from his post within the party or be placed on probation; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be expelled from the party.

those who have been held hostage for not knowing the truth, and have shown repentance after criticism and education, may be exempted from punishment or not be punished.

Take part in other activities such as assembly, procession and demonstration without the approval of the organization, and if the circumstances are minor, give a warning or a serious warning; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be dismissed from his post within the party or be placed on probation; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be expelled from the party.

Extended information:

On the qualitative problem of confronting organizational censorship.

There is a process of evolution between the old and new regulations. Article 24 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of Party Discipline, which came into effect in 23, calls such behaviors "interference and obstruction of organizational review". It is not stipulated as an independent violation of discipline, but as a circumstance that can be severely or severely punished.

In the new Regulations, this kind of behavior is expressed as an act of opposing organizational censorship, which is separately recognized as a violation of political discipline in the specific provisions. If the circumstances are serious, it can be expelled from the Party. This fully reflects the political demands of the Party organization on party member's loyalty and honesty, and embodies the inner-party censorship characteristic of "the Party discipline is stricter than the national law".

Therefore, if the auditee's interference and obstruction of the organization's review all occurred before January 1, 216, it can be regarded as a serious or aggravated punishment; If its behavior against organizational review occurs or continues after January 1, 216, it should be separately identified as a violation of political discipline and combined with other disciplinary actions.

Baidu Encyclopedia —— Against organizational censorship.