Joke Collection Website - Mood Talk - If you have a good life and a poor man has violated your interests, then when you hold him accountable, some people may say that you are rich and heartless.

If you have a good life and a poor man has violated your interests, then when you hold him accountable, some people may say that you are rich and heartless.

Judging from the general characteristics of human nature, the deep reason for hating the rich is the individual's strong possessiveness of wealth. Hating the rich means hating the rich, and loving the rich means loving the rich and not loving the rich. The essence of hating the rich is to love the rich. Here, hate is the means and love is the purpose. Having wealth for others is hatred, and having wealth for yourself is love. Wealth itself is a coin, and hate and love are just two sides of this coin. For myself, it embodies the love side of coins; For others, it reflects the annoying side of coins. From the social reality, loving the rich is a very normal psychology that most people have. Everyone has a love of beauty; Everyone has love for the rich. Of course, there are some "superman" who don't love wealth, but here we only talk about the general situation, not some special circumstances. Confucius said, "You can ask for wealth. Although you are a scapegoat, I will do it for you. " If not, just do as I say. "(The Analects of Confucius) The ancients also said:" Everything is inferior, only reading is high "; But there is a purpose behind reading, that is, "There is a golden house in the book and Yan Ruyu in the book". The survey also found that although people think the rich are extravagant (57. 1%), greedy (52.7%) and corrupt (45.0%); But at the same time, 92.9% people want to become rich. From the perspective of theoretical analysis, hating the rich is also a natural logical extension of loving the rich. On the one hand, people's desires are endless, on the other hand, resources are scarce. How to satisfy unlimited desires with limited resources, in which the individual's possession of resources as much as possible is the premise to achieve this goal. The objective reality of scarce resources means that when others have more resources, the possibility of their own possession of more resources will be reduced, and the means to satisfy their desires will also be reduced. This will cause personal pain. Hating the rich is a manifestation of this personal pain. On the contrary, if a person completely gives up the desire for wealth, then he (she) does not need to have hatred for wealth. Therefore, excluding the influence of other factors, a person's hatred of wealth and love for wealth should have a certain positive ratio. In addition, according to the law of diminishing marginal utility, when the material income level is low, the utility level of the general public for possessing material wealth is relatively high, so poverty has the function of aggravating hatred for wealth; On the contrary, with the increase of a person's wealth and the continuous improvement of his income level, his hatred of wealth also tends to decrease. The psychology of hating the rich has not only the common people's factors, but also the deeper social and economic system roots. Uneven social and economic development and imperfect system will further stimulate and aggravate people's hatred of the rich. The imbalance of social and economic development and the imperfection of the system will have the following unreasonable consequences on the distribution of social wealth: first, it will cause the imbalance of wealth stock among individuals; The second is to cause the imbalance of wealth flow between individuals; The third is the disorder of personal wealth acquisition rules. All three situations will aggravate people's dissatisfaction and hatred towards the rich. First, from the perspective of wealth stock, people's satisfaction and utility level depend on both the absolute holding level of wealth and the relative holding level of wealth. People have two attributes: natural attribute and social attribute. On the one hand, the absolute holding level of wealth mainly meets people's basic requirements for natural attributes, on the other hand, it also meets people's social attributes to a certain extent; The relative holding level of wealth mainly meets people's basic requirements for social attributes. The natural attribute is the body, and the social attribute is the soul. Natural attributes reflect existence itself, while social attributes reflect the meaning of existence. And the meaning of existence is the dominant of existence. Because the improvement of the absolute holding level of wealth does not necessarily mean the improvement of the relative holding level of wealth, with the increase of the total social wealth, the total utility level of wealth does not necessarily increase. However, when the wealth level gap between individuals is large, the total utility level of wealth may decline. When the utility level of wealth declines, the psychology of hating the rich will also increase, because this decline is produced in comparison with the rich. Second, from the perspective of wealth flow, when one's investment and return are not equal to others, there will be a sense of relative deprivation. The gap of wealth flow mainly reflects the gap of income level. Due to the unreasonable distribution system and other reasons, people may not get the same return for the same efforts. At this time, people will feel unfair, psychologically unbalanced, and have a sense of loss and dissatisfaction. And with the widening income gap between people, people's dissatisfaction will also increase. The widening income gap caused by unreasonable distribution system will make people question the rationality of the source of wealth, so hatred is rich in certain reasons. Third, judging from the rules of wealth acquisition, the increase of illegal phenomena will aggravate people's hatred and anger towards wealth. The essence of rules is interests, and the core function of rules is to delimit the action boundary for people to obtain interests. When the rules are invalid or inefficient, people will doubt the legitimacy and rationality of wealth acquisition, so there is an objective basis for hating the rich. The direct causes of the above three situations are the backwardness of social economy and the imperfection of system, while the rich are not the direct culprits; Of course, the rich may also play some bad roles in it, but this cannot be blamed on the rich. Not all the rich people in the world are bad people, and not all the bad people in the world are rich people. However, the logic of social development is often: whenever social contradictions intensify and dissatisfaction increases, the rich often become the direct object of people's dissatisfaction and become a substitute for people's dissatisfaction. The question is who makes the rich so rich. The wealth of the rich has become a jinx at this time, and it has become an objective need to break the wealth and avoid disasters. Therefore, if social instability and crisis occur, it is not only bad for the poor, but also bad for the rich. For the rich, people and money are empty if they don't do well. Hating the rich is not a reasonable means to solve the problem. Among the rich, there are some who get rich reasonably and some who get rich unreasonably, so we should treat the rich differently, and we should not generalize and take revenge. The fundamental solution to the problem should be based on