Talking to lawyers is taboo.

Talking with lawyers is a taboo, and it is inevitable that we will encounter some legal disputes in our life and work, so we can choose to solve them through judicial channels, which is often called "litigation". If we go to court, we must hire a lawyer. So what are the taboos in talking to lawyers?

Taboos for talking with lawyers 1 1. Too superstitious.

The purpose of some people's lawyers is to ask lawyers to "engage in blending", hoping that lawyers can "match bridges" or provide "opportunities" for them. When they meet for the first time, they are outspoken and full of gunpowder. The value of lawyers lies in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of clients to the maximum extent according to facts and laws, rather than bringing the bad experience of "litigation is relationship" to clients.

Taboo 2. Bargain with a lawyer

Smart clients don't obsess over lawyers' quotations. An honest lawyer, his service will definitely match his quotation. In fact, this is also an ideal service state, and you don't have to waste a lot of energy to bargain.

Taboo three. Trust the lawyer's promises and guarantees.

In practice, when some parties deal with lawyers for the first time, they ask lawyers to make a commitment to the outcome of the case, which is extremely ridiculous.

Taboo 4. Lawyers introduced by acquaintances are unreliable.

Some lawyers collude with the introducer, and the lawyer gives a certain commission, and the introducer is responsible for introducing the case.

Therefore, sober parties should comprehensively examine the lawyer's personal practice experience and professional knowledge, rather than trusting the introduction or encouragement of acquaintances, and should have their own objective standards and evaluation criteria.

Taboo five. Trying to control the lawyer after paying.

After reaching an entrustment with a law firm, the parties concerned should be full of trust in their lawyers, establish the idea of taking lawyers' work as the center, and obey the guidance of professionals. Of course, this does not rule out that the parties have their own suggestions or opinions and can communicate with lawyers.

What are the precautions for clients to communicate with lawyers?

First of all, let the parties fully understand their own ideas.

Lawyers can be said to be quite familiar with the operation and mastery of the case process, how to do it and how to prepare for the work. But for many parties, it is the first time to contact a lawyer, the first time to "go to court", and they don't know how to handle a case or how a lawyer handles a case.

I don't even understand a lot of lawyers' ideas. In this regard, lawyers must pay attention to it and budget a certain amount of time to fully communicate with the parties in order to make them understand. Otherwise, the lawyer and the client's ideological pace is inconsistent, and there may be a phenomenon of "out of step", which is not conducive to the depth and accuracy of the case and is not conducive to "fighting" side by side with the client.

Second, we should have a sense of "saving money" for the parties.

It is not easy for a client to find a lawyer to file a lawsuit. In the current economic crisis, it is difficult to make money, lawyers are not easy, and clients are even more difficult. At present, many of our clients pay legal fees, which may be the client's salary for several months or even longer. In addition to paying legal fees, there may be many expenses during the progress of the case, such as investigation, photocopying, transportation, business trip and so on.

Third, be patient with the parties.

The lawyer is very busy, and all the clients know it. However, no matter how busy lawyers are, they should treat their clients equally. If they can't manage Zhang San's case, they will despise Li Si's case. Since we have accepted other people's cases and received their money, we must serve them.

The client does not hire a lawyer to buy "anger", but lets the lawyer solve the problem himself. Some of our lawyers are sometimes impatient and rude to their clients. Sometimes even push the ball to the client, making the client in a dilemma.

Four, to timely "report" the progress of the case to the client.

After the client gives the money to the lawyer, he is most worried that the lawyer will do nothing after receiving the money. Generally speaking, the parties will not "hate" the lawyers who report to them. Our case management standard requires our lawyers to record the progress of the case within a certain period of time, just to remind lawyers not to forget the client's affairs. What's the progress of the case and what your lawyer is doing must be reported to the client in time, and the client will not bother you.

Taboos to talk to lawyers 2 Taboos to talk to lawyers

Trust the lawyer's promises and guarantees. In practice, when some parties deal with lawyers for the first time, they ask lawyers to make a commitment to the outcome of the case, which is extremely ridiculous.

When talking and communicating with a lawyer, you must trust your lawyer, otherwise it is meaningless to find a lawyer. When accepting a client's entrustment, a lawyer will treat the client's case wholeheartedly, both in terms of professional ethics and entrustment fees.

If the case file is leaked to the family members of the suspect, the family members may be eager to save people, and then help collude, destroy, forge, transfer evidence, and even retaliate against witnesses. Furthermore, lawyers should not disclose information that should not be disclosed in the case, such as state secrets, personal privacy, business secrets and so on.

The lawyer and the client promise the outcome of the case. This is taboo. In other words, the lawyer may not know the outcome of the case before the final judgment comes out, but the lawyer will try his best to get the best result for the client. However, if the lawyer promises the result to the client in order to accept the case, the result will be complained or punished if it is not satisfactory.

How to find a satisfactory lawyer when encountering disputes?

First of all, please ask a professional lawyer for help.

To find a lawyer, we must first understand whether a lawyer has a major and what is it? Why is major so important? Comprehensive lawyers have a disadvantage of 10 compared with specialized lawyers.

1. The legal provisions are so complicated that it is difficult for lawyers to master them all. Comprehensive lawyers have to study again every time they handle a case, and they simply don't have enough energy to thoroughly understand every business.

2, professional experience is formed in actual combat, comprehensive lawyers lack of professional experience, it is difficult to develop a perfect solution.

In actual combat, many occasions need improvisation, and it is difficult to play freely without deep professional skills.

There are many things that can't be found in law at all, which were discovered by lawyers when handling cases. Lawyers in this major understand, but lawyers in another major don't. Comprehensive lawyers have little knowledge of the deep-seated things of various professions, which are often the essence of lawyer business.

There are four gaps between comprehensive lawyers and professional lawyers, that is to say, professional lawyers have four advantages over comprehensive lawyers. There is a saying that interlacing is like a mountain. Although they are all lawyers, their majors are not as good as mountains, there is at least one wall, which may be the wall that determines success or failure, so you can't choose a lawyer regardless of qualifications and reputation, as long as the major is wrong.

Second, professional lawyers are not as good as professional teams.

In our industry, there is a famous saying that one person can't be a team.

In addition to his own qualifications and hard work, his success also has a very important factor, that is, the environment and the people behind him.

1, a person handling a case is limited to his own cognition, and a professional team can brainstorm.

Broaden the interests, check and fill the gaps, and form a better solution. For example, professional lawyers have come up with a case-handling plan themselves. Do you know any shortcomings? There's a better plan. I don't know. I want to discuss it, but my colleagues are not proficient. How should I discuss it? The scheme negotiated by three heads are better than one, Zhuge Liang and a team is self-evident.

2, the growth of lawyers, in addition to their own efforts and qualifications, the environment is also very important, such as

The fruit should be felt by yourself. To be honest, it is very long and far away. Under the influence of a professional team, you can cooperate with each other, encourage each other, compete with each other, and train team experts and leaders. His knowledge structure and experience system are incomparable to your personal lawyer.

3, individual lawyers actually have no real professional lawyers, in comparison, lawyers.

The lawyers in the team are more professional. It is not easy for individual lawyers to be professional because of lack of business. Lawyers not only require specialization, but also hope to achieve a breakthrough on the basis of specialization. For example, in our Wandian Law Firm, we require professional lawyers among professional lawyers.

It is not enough for you to be professional, but also to be refined on the basis of specialization. In many cases, the lawyer's unique insights and solutions are the key to solving problems. How can they be unique?

Not to be different and unique, but to see the problem more accurately and thoroughly. It is impossible without profound professional skills and many practical experiences. Lawyers in professional teams rely on old lawyers to bring new lawyers.

Therefore, we should remember that ordinary cases can be handled by professional private lawyers, while large and complex cases must be completed by teamwork.

Talking to a lawyer taboo 3 What should I pay attention to when talking to a lawyer?

First of all, many people like to talk nonsense when communicating with lawyers, because they are ashamed to express or because something will harm their own interests, so they choose to avoid talking about something. However, this will affect the progress of the case. If the lawyer can't produce some key evidence, it will lead to the final failure of the lawsuit, and you will eventually suffer.

So when you talk to a lawyer, you must trust the lawyer, confess everything to the lawyer, and don't let go of any details, otherwise the lawyer you hired will be meaningless.

Secondly, when you talk to a lawyer, you must tell the truth. No matter what mistakes you make in the case, or what responsibilities you need to bear, you need to be honest with your lawyer. Otherwise, if the lawyer handles the case according to your lies, if the other party has sufficient evidence to show that the lawyer's words are false during the trial, it will also affect the lawyer's career and the possibility of losing the case is very high.

Finally, when you talk to a lawyer, you must make your position clear, such as what compensation you want, or what you need to seek the best interests, whether you want innocence or probation, and so on. In this case, the lawyer will make a specific statement according to the case, but the lawyer will not make a verbal commitment or a written commitment, because everyone is equal before the law, and you can't trample on the law because of your own selfish interests.

In a word, the above are matters that should be paid attention to when talking with lawyers. In addition, when talking on the phone, don't communicate by phone. It is best to communicate face to face on the spot and bring relevant information to prove it. I believe that with the help of lawyers, your case can make progress and the success rate of winning the case will be higher.