"Every time you kill a dog, you are a scholar." Why do you say that?

In the real society, the relationship between people is the most complicated, and from the traditional folk culture handed down, there are actually some famous sentences used to describe interpersonal relationships in folk language. I don't know what you think of this old saying, but if we combine it with everyone's life, we will find that this sentence is actually very realistic and what the ancients said is very reasonable.

So since the ancients saw through a social reality, is it reasonable behind it? Why do some people still have objections to this old saying? From a cultural point of view, let's talk about the origin of this sentence first! She was left by Cao Xuequan, a famous upright poet in Ming Dynasty. At that time, he also encountered such a difficult thing when handling a case, so he summed up such a sentence to describe interpersonal relationships.

"Every time you kill a dog, you are a scholar", which means that most of the loyal people are ordinary people who are engaged in the next generation of occupations. It can also be said that these people have no culture. But in any case, they are a group of people loyal to justice. And what about people with knowledge and learning? This group of people often do treacherous things, many of which are heartbreaking! In fact, if we want to interpret this sentence, then people's positions are different, and different interpersonal relationships will lead to different interpretations.

In fact, the spirit of justice is innate. When a person has no so-called education, his sense of justice occupies an absolute dominant position in his life, and his consciousness is full of sense of justice. However, with the different education he received, his quality and cultivation changed. At this time, self-cultivation and treating people with things overwhelmed all sense of justice, so what he learned and the social truth he saw became the dominant position in his heart.

This is a good explanation, why the scholar will become a sad person instead, and will become that kind of treacherous person! They are influenced by the environment and society, and this negative image of people is exactly what everyone wants to vomit. Everyone praises this sentence, which also reflects everyone's hatred for such a sad person.

By comparing dog butchers with scholars, it is suddenly explained that there are differences between people in social communication and they will have different reactions in the face of different environments. On the contrary, people who know nothing about the market like to attach importance to feelings and righteousness, while those who have read poetry books are playing their own tricks. As the old saying goes, "Everyone who hits a dog is an ungrateful scholar", which shows that there are too many changes in society and the complexity between people. This sentence has its rationality, but there are actually some prejudices and misunderstandings in it.

With the correct attitude, in fact, the views handed down by the ancients are not absolutely correct. But everyone can play a certain warning role through such warnings. So since the ancients saw through a social reality, is it reasonable behind it? Why do some people still have objections to this old saying? From a cultural point of view, let's talk about the origin of this sentence first! She was left by Cao Xuequan, a famous upright poet in Ming Dynasty. At that time, he also encountered such a difficult thing when handling a case, so he summed up such a sentence to describe interpersonal relationships.