Joke Collection Website - Mood Talk - The dangerous house in my hometown is going to be demolished. Can I get a subsidy? Is the homestead still owned by the head of the household?

The dangerous house in my hometown is going to be demolished. Can I get a subsidy? Is the homestead still owned by the head of the household?

1. Can I get a subsidy if the dangerous house in my hometown is demolished?

Whether the demolition of dangerous houses in rural areas can get subsidies depends on the situation. If the dangerous building is an illegal building, then don't think about subsidies, and you may be fined. If it is a legal building, it depends on what kind of situation it belongs to.

Belong to the rural reconstruction, give subsidies. However, subsidies for the renovation of dilapidated houses in rural areas are targeted at specific targets. The subsidy targets for the renovation of dilapidated houses in rural areas are four key targets, namely, poor households in dilapidated houses, low-income households, support targets for the poor in rural areas, and poor families with disabilities. The average person does not subsidize.

If the demolition is forced by the government, the owner of the house can get compensation regardless of the object, and both the new house and the dangerous house can get some compensation. However, the new house will definitely get more compensation than the dangerous house.

Special reminder: according to Chinese laws, houses are citizens' personal property. Private legal property is protected by law, so the demolition of dangerous houses should follow legal procedures, and no unit or individual may demolish villagers' old houses in the name of dangerous houses. If the demolition party fails to follow the legal procedures, the owner of the house may refuse the demolition. Moreover, whether it is a dangerous building or not is not up to anyone. The appraisal of dilapidated houses in rural areas is organized by the housing and urban-rural construction departments with professional knowledge or trained professionals, and the risks of various components of houses are appraised in accordance with the Technical Guidelines for Appraisal of Dangerous Houses in Rural Areas (Trial) (Jian Jian [2009] No.69).

Second, after the demolition of dangerous houses in rural areas, does the homestead still belong to the head of the household?

After the demolition of dangerous houses in rural areas, whether the homestead still belongs to the head of the household mainly depends on what kind of demolition it belongs to.

If it belongs to expropriation and demolition, and the house is expropriated, the homestead and house have nothing to do with the original owner after the demolished person gets compensation. Because after the compensation is levied according to legal procedures, the rural homestead becomes state-owned land and belongs to the state.

If it belongs to the renovation and demolition of dangerous buildings, according to China's policy, in principle, D-class dangerous buildings should be demolished and rebuilt at the original site, and C-class dangerous buildings should be repaired and reinforced. That is to say, after the demolition of rural D-class dangerous houses, the right to use the homestead still belongs to the original householder, who can rebuild the house on the original site.

However, from the reality, after some dangerous houses are demolished, the homestead occupied by dangerous houses will be collectively owned by farmers. For example, some people inherit their rural houses. If the heir does not meet the conditions for using the homestead, such as the household registration has moved out, in these cases, after the dangerous house is demolished, the original house owner can no longer rebuild the house on the original homestead, and the homestead is recovered by the collective economic organization. In addition, like some ex situ poverty alleviation relocation, after the original houses were demolished, the homestead was also taken back by the collective economic organizations, because according to the policy of "one household, one house", a rural villager can only own one homestead, so the new homestead that needs to be demolished will be taken back for greening.

After the demolition of dangerous houses in rural areas, does the homestead still belong to the head of the household? To sum up, in addition to distinguishing different demolition situations, it depends on whether the owner of the dangerous house meets the conditions for the use of the homestead.