Why are many farmers unwilling to install natural gas in rural areas?

Should natural gas be installed in rural areas? Why do many people object?

There are many people who oppose it, which is enough to explain the problem.

Now the rural areas are developing rapidly, and cement roads are basically accessible to every village. You can think about why there is basically no objection to road construction, because road construction has indeed brought development to the countryside and convenience to farmers.

Why are so many people opposed to the installation of natural gas? It is because the installation of natural gas is not really suitable for rural areas, and the most important thing is to increase the living cost of farmers. The following small series will talk about the impact of installing natural gas in rural areas on farmers.

1: There is a charge for installing natural gas, not free installation. In some places, it costs several thousand yuan to install one, and it will cost a lot of money to use gas in the future, which invisibly increases the living cost of farmers.

Wood stoves have been used in rural areas for thousands of years. Curling smoke is a unique rural landscape, a fairyland on earth written by literati, and the homesickness of children far away from home, especially in rural areas in Northeast China. In some places, burning kang is necessary. How can you burn a kang without a firewood stove? The most important thing is to cook with a firewood stove, without cost. As long as you are not lazy, firewood is everywhere.

Most of the rural areas are old people and children now. Most young farmers work hard outside and rarely go back all the year round. It is difficult and unsafe for the elderly and children to use natural gas. Some rural elderly people have never even been to counties and cities in their whole lives. It's really hard for him to use natural gas suddenly now.

Developing rural areas is of course a good thing, but no matter how rural areas develop and change, they must be based on increasing farmers' income. If we just blindly improve the quality of life, we can't improve the income, and we can't really improve the quality of life of farmers. On the contrary, it will increase the cost of living of farmers and probably reduce the quality of life of farmers.