Write a paper on ethics.

Human resources are a special kind of resources. For selecting and identifying talents, having both ability and political integrity may be the first choice for many people, but after all, there are too few people with both ability and political integrity. There is no uniform standard for judging moral character. We emphasize that the principle of selecting talents should be having both ability and political integrity, not excluding and excluding other talents. The employment policy of "promoting only talents" and "not restraining conduct" not only contradicts the employment standard of "having both ability and political integrity" in modern management psychology in China, but also provides positive and pragmatic theoretical reference for the employment route in the current social environment of reform and opening up in China, which has far-reaching significance.

Keywords: having both ability and political integrity, appointing people on their merits

Human resource is a special kind of resource, which has the characteristics of irreplaceable and high added value. Human resource management has become a way or means for a country or enterprise to gain competitive advantage. 1In September, 1995, the World Bank announced in the Calculation Method of New National Wealth Designated by the World Bank: a new method to determine the wealth of a country and region, that is, based on natural capital, creative capital, human capital and social capital, human capital has become an important indicator to measure a country's wealth. 2 1 century, the development and management of human resources plays a decisive role in the competition of comprehensive national strength and is the key to the prosperity of the country and the prosperity of the nation. Effective development and utilization of human resources has become the primary national policy of all countries in the world.

As a mirror from the same sources is a great historical work, and its description and evaluation of many historical events can actually serve as a model for moralists. At the beginning of the book, I introduced a theory that "only when there is virtue", which is a very meaningful practice and a summary to guide this book and evaluate the world! His definition of gentleman and villain is incisive and a model of moralist.

Sima Shi said, "Fu Cong said that being strong is talent and being honest is virtue. Talent is the capital of virtue; De is handsome. Bamboo in the cloud dream is also the power of the world. However, if it is not twisted and feathered, it cannot be strengthened. The gold of Tangxi is also beneficial to the world. It cannot be melted, sharpened or strengthened. Therefore, it is called a' saint' because of its talent and virtue, and it is called a' fool' because of its talent and virtue. Desheng is called a gentleman, and Shengde is called a villain. ①

In the history of China, there are three theories about talent selection.

Elite management: This theory means that people are only promoted by their abilities, regardless of their moral behavior. The representative of this theory is Cao Cao in the Three Kingdoms period. Cao Cao once said: whatever a thief does, as long as he has a skill, he can reuse it. Indeed, Cao Cao is magnanimous in employing people, and he does everything he can. When analyzing Cao Cao's ten victories and Yuan Shao's ten defeats, Guo Jia once pointed out: "If you are broad outside and jealous inside, you will only be intimate, simple outside and talented in employing people." For example, Cao Cao won't blur the criteria for selecting people because outsiders are loyal to the old master or flatter themselves. Cai Mao and Zhang Yun betrayed their countries for honor. Although Cao Cao took advantage of it for a while, he had already disposed of it in his heart. Song Yang in Hanzhong is a greedy seller. He gave Hanzhong to Cao Cao, who still beheaded him. As for the loyal Zhang Liao and Wen Pin, they turned their backs on the dark, and Cao Cao was discerning. They not only sincerely appreciated them, but also promoted them to knights and entrusted them with important tasks. Especially in his later years, he reused Sima Yi, who was very talented and disagreed with himself, and finally realized his desire to unify the Central Plains and applied the idea of meritocracy to a perfect situation.

Theory of having both ability and political integrity: The main meaning of this theory is that only people with both ability and political integrity can be cadres. Among the pre-Qin philosophers, Mozi advocated selecting talents with both ability and political integrity. He believes: "People who study benevolence and righteousness in one way or another are big and govern people, small and official, far and unbiased, close and self-cultivation, unjust, unreasonable and prosperous." This gentleman's way is also. (2) Those who are talented but not virtuous can't be reused; those who are virtuous but not talented should be cultivated before they can be used. The theory of having both ability and political integrity tends to be moral at first. As long as the moral character is noble, people with just talents can reuse it. The representative of this theory is Zeng Guofan in Qing Dynasty. Zeng Guofan pays attention to personality and then considers talent. Similarly, he has done a great job in this way of employing people. The modern expression of the theory of having both ability and political integrity is "both red and expert", which was widely popular during the ten-year Cultural Revolution. In practical work, most leaders are practicing the theory of having both ability and political integrity when promoting cadres. But in real life, there are too few people with noble moral character or outstanding talents, and even fewer people with both ability and political integrity. Therefore, it is difficult to implement the theory of having both ability and political integrity. It is inevitable to emphasize the requirements for morality and reduce the requirements for talents, otherwise it will not work in practice. Of course, we should try our best to find the best combination of the two.

Virtue-only theory: this theory holds that virtue is the best way to select people, and it can be reused as long as it is noble. The key to a person is to have moral character, which can be cultivated; Talent without virtue is not conducive to the group, but will only destroy the cause of the group. The representative of this theory is Song Xianggong in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. Song Xianggong blindly paid attention to benevolence, righteousness and morality, and as a result, he lost the battle, leaving a laughing stock for future generations. The implicit premise of this theory is that everyone can have any level of talent and hold any level of cadre positions through proper training. In fact, this assumption does not exist. In practice, we find that many people cannot be trained at all because of their basic quality problems.

In the history of talents in China, although celebrities have different understandings of the relationship between ability and political integrity, it is obvious that people with both ability and political integrity are still the first choice for rulers to appoint officials. The theory of having both ability and political integrity should be very popular.

We often hear such teachings. For any career, talents with both ability and political integrity are the pillars, and those with virtue and no talent can use them. Don't use talented people without virtue. As for those who have neither, of course, they are rubbish. However, I often suspect that the reason for the slow development of China's career is that there are too many people who have both ability and political integrity, virtue and no talent. Virtue refers to moral character, or a positive evaluation recognized by the personnel department of some other organizations. Interestingly, these are often not easy to be specifically evaluated. The leader said that there is virtue. So this virtue has become a little girl who can dress up at will. Which corrupt official was not recognized as having both ability and political integrity when he was selected by the personnel department?

In fact, having both ability and political integrity, there is nothing wrong with putting virtue before talent. But this virtue itself has become a derivative of hypocrisy or scepter, thus crowding out talents. This is the tragedy that talents are often frustrated in reality. Who doesn't understand, the so-called virtue, is HuiLaiShi, understand the leader's mind, guards are often not enough, spiritual slaves do well, is very virtue.

The most terrible example is that people have no talent in determining whether they have the authority of "virtue". Faced with recognized talents, they are embarrassed to use "talents" as a handle for veto, so they have to praise "virtue". China's 5,000-year history is nothing more than a record that a good horse has been recognized as a bad horse by people with ulterior motives.

In modern times, the evaluation criteria of scholarships tend to be scientific, easy to quantify, and it is more difficult to ask for leave. Even if the leaders got the doctor's degree in the Party School, they often said wrong words and layman's words on the rostrum, which constituted an embarrassing joke. The eyes of the masses are very discerning. Of course, many hipsters who "have both ability and political integrity" and "have virtue but no talent" have long been seen through.

Wu Qi, a famous politician and strategist in the Warring States period, was ambitious and determined to become a famous vassal. However, according to general moral standards, Wu Qi is also a person with bad conduct. First, his dead mother was not buried. Then, in order to gain the trust of Lumugong, he actually "killed his wife to win". For such a controversial figure, he was highly valued by the king of Chu, Moran, and was ordered to preside over the political reform. The Wuqi political reform achieved great results, which made Chu quickly become strong. Guard Wu Qizhe is an official in Lu. When the Qi people attacked Lu, the Lu people took it for granted that they would be generals, so they married their daughters. However, the Lu people were suspicious of this, so they killed their wives in order to be generals, which greatly broke the division of Qi. Or Lv Hou said, "I attended the first thing. My mother didn't attend the funeral when she died. I attended." Now he killed his wife to become your general. Up, cruel and thin pedestrians. And in the name of destroying the enemy, in the name of Lu, the ministers must figure Lu. "Afraid of offending. When I heard about the saint of Wei Wenhou, I went back to him. When asked about Zhu Li Ke, Li Ke said, "If you are lustful and lustful, Sima Yi can survive. So he decided to attack the state of Qin and pull out five cities. He started as a general, sharing food and clothing with the lowest foot soldiers, lying without a seat, riding or riding, winning food with kisses and sharing labor with the foot soldiers. If a pawn is sick and gangrenous, he is sucking. Mother cried when she heard this. The humanitarian said, "The son is a pawn, and the general sucks his gangrene. Why are you crying? " Mom said, "No, it isn't. A few years ago, Wu Gong sucked his father, and his father didn't fight back, so he was killed by an enemy. Wu Gong sucked his son again today, I don't know where he died and cried. " (3) Another example is Chen Ping, a hero in the early Han Dynasty. He is also a very resourceful person, but no one is perfect. Chen Ping's moral character is not pleasing: when he stayed at home, he stole his wife; Wei can't allow it, and the pawn will return to Chu; If you miss Chu, you will die in Han. People with more gold will get good, and people with less gold will get bad. (4) Liu Bang, who slandered everyone, was unmoved. He trusted Chen Ping and said, "You should be generous, worship as a lieutenant, protect the army and protect all the generals. The generals dare not say anything. "Chen Ping didn't live up to Liu Bang's expectations and made many surprises to save Liu Bang from danger.

Of course, the so-called valuing talents over morality does not mean that there are no requirements for the virtues of the candidates. For those who violate the general moral norms, the rulers will naturally not abandon them out of the urgent needs of the times. Cao Cao is famous for his "meritocracy" in employing people, and has an obvious tendency to value talents over morality. But Yang Xiu, Kong Rong and others were also killed by Cao Cao. Everything has a scale.

At the beginning of Emperor Taizong's accession to the throne, Feng Deyi was appointed as a sage, but he did nothing for a long time. Instead, he said, "I don't care, but I don't have a wizard's ear today." The master said, "A gentleman takes man as a tool, and each takes his own advantage. Are people who have ruled since ancient times borrowed from different generations? People who suffer from self-ignorance can falsely accuse them for a lifetime! " In Tang Taizong's view, Feng Deyi didn't choose people because he didn't know how to choose people. He was not the best talent in the world. Tang Taizong selected a large number of talents in an eclectic way, which laid a talent foundation for his imperial career and chastity. Wei Zhengshan's remonstrance, Fang Shan's counsel, Du Ruhui's determination, Dai's strict enforcement of the law, and Emperor Taizong's respective strengths have brought their talents into full play. In fact, Tang Taizong's view just shows that the lack of talents is more because the leaders have not found talents than no talents. There are always swift horses, but Bole doesn't. In modern times, many leading cadres and enterprise personnel departments often cry out for lack of talents while leaving them unused.

As the saying goes, "the ruler is short, the inch is long", and leaders should not only be good at giving play to their own strengths, but also tolerate their own shortcomings. As the ancients said, there is no fish in clear water, and there is no disciple in people's view. If a leader sees the shortcomings of his subordinates too clearly, he will inevitably pay more attention to his own work and cover up many advantages of his subordinates. In this way, the enthusiasm of subordinates is bound to be hit, which is very unfavorable to the development of the organization. In the process of employing people, leaders must never forget that employing people is for career development, not for pleasing to the eye. Therefore, it is a principle that must be followed to make use of people's strengths and tolerate people's weaknesses.

Reasonable talent matching can make individual talents release the maximum energy under effective management, thus producing a good organizational effect. The efficiency of an organization certainly determines the quality of talents, but it also depends on the rational allocation of the overall structure of talents. Scientific talent allocation and management can make talents develop their strengths and avoid their weaknesses, and produce strength beyond personal ability. Moreover, the progress of team learning is much faster than that of individual learning, and huge benefits can be obtained by optimizing the combined talent structure.