Compare, is the former better or the latter better?

Besides, our unit is barely a second-tier city and a national second-tier enterprise, and its industry prospects are not good.

First, the framework of the company:

Our unit is a group state-owned enterprise with about 400 people. The group headquarters belongs to the management organization, with more than 20 people, and there are 6 subsidiaries below, ranging from 100 to dozens of people.

Second, wages and benefits.

The group boss's annual salary is about 300,000. The vice president is about 200 thousand. The annual salary of the bosses of each subsidiary is about 6.5438+0.5 million. The middle-level employees in a subsidiary like me are about 65,438+million a year, and the average employees are slightly different according to their length of service, education and professional titles.

Third, welfare.

State-owned enterprises, in strict accordance with state regulations, will provide five insurances and one gold, two weekends, overtime pay, year-end bonus (this has been included in the salary mentioned above), heating and cooling fees, thousands of dollars, Mid-Autumn Festival, Spring Festival and other important festivals will have some benefits, mainly in kind, and the prices are not expensive.

Say an expensive one first. Two years ago, the unit was allocated a house, but it was not allocated. This is lower than the market price. Internal development just caught up with the sharp rise in house prices. In two years, the price has increased by at least three times compared with when I just bought it. Are these much better than high wages?

Although our wages are not very high, state-owned enterprises can't survive and starve to death. Most of them want stability and enjoyment, and the turnover rate is very poor. Apart from retirement and transfer, almost no one resigned.

How much salary can I get a month?