Now young teachers in rural schools always want to be transferred to the city. Will they regret it when they go to town?

I have several colleagues, all young teachers transferred from rural schools to cities. When chatting with me, they all said that they regretted transferring to a school in the city for the following reasons:

First of all, the schools in the city are too busy. At present, the number of students in rural schools is decreasing, especially in rural primary schools. Some schools have only a few students in each grade, and there are more than a dozen older ones. Teachers in rural schools have more classes, but the number of students is small, so it is convenient to manage, teach, coach and correct homework. Unlike schools in the city, there are more than 50 students in one class, two classes or even several classes, and the amount of correcting homework is too large.

There are few activities in rural schools and the work is relatively simple. There are too many school activities in this city. Teachers should participate in and organize school activities. For example, the activities of attending lectures and evaluating classes are also carried out in rural schools, but they are not frequent. Schools in cities are different. There are many classes and teachers, so the activities of attending and evaluating classes must be carried out decently.

In addition, urban schools are generally a banner of local education, and the number of inspections is far more than that of rural schools. During the inspection, teachers should assign tasks, improve materials, organize files and meet the inspection.

Second, the income of schools in cities is low. In recent years, the national policy has tilted towards rural education. Rural teachers have township subsidies and living allowances. Counting these two items, it will cost hundreds or even thousands of dollars. If rural teachers transfer to cities, these two subsidies will be abolished and their wages will naturally be low.

Third, it is difficult to promote school titles in cities. That's also true. As mentioned earlier, in recent years, the national policy has tilted towards rural education, and the promotion of teachers' professional titles is no exception. There are many favorable conditions for teachers in rural schools, and it is relatively easy to promote their professional titles. In particular, there are places for middle and senior professional titles in urban areas, but they are not limited by places in rural schools. You can comment as much as you want. Therefore, schools in cities may not be able to evaluate senior titles at the age of 50, while schools in rural areas may be senior titles at the age of 40. When the professional title goes up, the salary will naturally be high. Obviously, teachers in cities are very disadvantaged in this regard.

However, I feel that when these colleagues say they regret, they are not really sorry. If you really regret it, it is not easy to move from the city to the countryside. As long as you open your mouth, it will be realized immediately.

They are still very young. It is the wish of many young rural teachers to move to the city. In any case, the working environment and living environment in cities are better than those in rural schools. And work and life are much more convenient. There are places for shopping, eating and entertainment. Unlike the countryside, there is no place to go. Every day, it is really miserable. Also, if you work in a school in the city, you can go home after work, look after the house and take care of the children. Unlike rural teachers, the typical "mountain poor households" can only go home on weekends and can't take care of their children.

In a word, entering the city has advantages, and for young teachers, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. You can't have it both ways. I don't think it's necessary to say regret.

I don't know what you think about this. Welcome to discuss and leave messages.