Which is better for nurses to work in blood stations, epidemic prevention stations or hospitals? Please talk about the specific advantages and disadvantages.

Those two friends hit the nail on the head. First of all, are you a nurse in the establishment? If not, the choice is meaningless. All the same, low salary, no future. If so, I suggest you go to a hospital or an epidemic prevention station. If the hospital is top three, then choose the hospital. Because the hospital is a public institution in balance allocation, it has the right to generate income independently. Only a large-scale and powerful hospital can guarantee good benefits and high income, and at the same time, you can enjoy the welfare benefits brought by some national financial allocations, which is beyond the reach of enterprises. If it is a hospital below Grade III B, I suggest you give up and choose an epidemic prevention station instead. Don't underestimate this epidemic prevention station, because the temple is full of evil spirits ... well, it seems that this metaphor is not appropriate-

-! That's what it means anyway. The epidemic prevention station is the most basic health administrative institution, which can direct hospitals at the same level in this area. Districts and counties are called epidemic prevention stations, and provinces and cities are called the first-level CDC. Enjoy full financial allocation, relaxed and stable, and have an iron rice bowl, but the total income is definitely better than that of the top three hospitals. Some blood stations belong to the Red Cross (civil organizations only) or subordinate institutions of civil affairs departments. From this point of view, they are certainly not as good as the other two. Needless to say, if the hospital epidemic prevention station can't go, the blood station will settle. It is too difficult for nurses to find a job now. Finally, I will emphasize the establishment again! Compile! Compile! Very important!