Tell me about the man who smashed his car.

According to the damage, there is no need to bear responsibility or secondary responsibility.

In this case, the main fault lies in the other party, and the other party agrees that you smashed the car, which constitutes the victim's fault+the victim's consent. According to the theory of tort law, the victim's consent and the victim's fault are exempt reasons, which can reduce or exempt the liability.

But you are also at fault. You are at fault for two reasons: first, the expression of the other party's consent is not his inner meaning, which is called the reservation of true meaning in civil law, and you know its true meaning, so it will not constitute the victim's consent; Secondly, if you have the conditions, you can ask him to move the car in other ways, such as finding a parking attendant or a traffic policeman.

In practice, there are different understandings of this and they often compromise. The owner who violates the rules bears the primary responsibility, and you bear the secondary liability for compensation.