Who should be responsible for the loss of three bears playing with fire extinguishers in the garage?

After watching the relevant video of this news, we can see that these children are still young and underage. They play in the underground garage and then pick up fire extinguishers as toys. They sprayed the dry powder of fire extinguishers on more than a dozen cars. The dry powder fire extinguisher sprayed on the car will cause great losses to the car, which will not only corrode the car, but also affect the normal running of the car after the powder enters the engine. I think the loss of the owner should be borne by the parents of the child.

1. Parents should be responsible for their actions when their children are underage. Parents are the first guardians of their children. Parents should be responsible for their actions when their children are underage. According to the relevant laws of our country, if a minor causes damage to others, the guardian shall bear civil liability.

As can be seen from the video, these children who spray other people's cars with fire extinguishers are still minors, and guardians should be responsible for the mistakes of minors. Parents, as guardians of children, should be responsible for this matter and should compensate the owner for the loss.

Second, parents do not supervise their children, and parents are responsible for what children do. Parents should take good care of their children and don't let them run amok. In case the child does something wrong, parents should bear the corresponding responsibilities. This is a matter of course, a requirement of the law, and a responsibility that the guardian must bear.

The parents in this news incident didn't supervise their children well, which led to their behavior in the underground garage. If parents discipline their children at ordinary times, children will know that such behavior cannot be done. In the final analysis, this matter lies in the fact that the guardian did not do a good job of supervision, which led to the occurrence of the incident, so the guardian should bear the corresponding responsibilities.

What do you think of this matter? Who do you think should be responsible for the loss of the owner? Welcome to leave a message below!